- Joined
- Oct 31, 2020
And at the end of the day, that's the grand issue, isn't it? Microshit had the right idea, getting in early and pioneering it all. I abhor them and their shit OS, but it has good backwards-compatibility, in fact, it's windows' best feature and they know it. All the legacy software for obscure uses that "just works" matters only to enterprise users, where everything moves a lot slower. Here's the funny thing, though, and correct me if I'm wrong: Depending on how the software was written, and how many external, windows-based libraries were used, if you had the source, you could recompile for linux and have it up and running within a day in the existing workflow. So the only reason software devs end up not compiling for linux is a, real or percieved, lack of demand, which in effect ends up creating a negative feedback loop and a gross collusion with microshit: No one uses linux! -> We won't compile for linux. Also, reverse-engineering isn't (usually) an option because it takes too much time and is too difficult for most, even developers.where the fuck are my renderers for my medical images and research?
The solution?
I mean, I guess it'd be to shill linux at every opportunity and to use it in your own computing/your company's use (if possible). Maybe also to support FOSS projects monetarily as much as you reasonably can. This would try to break the cycle.
Or you can be a chad and modify/compile that complete windows xp source code leak... now there's an idea.