Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%
  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%

  • Total voters
    559
Metapedia is a pretty tight ship and there were some complex issues and unfairness in my banning, not least me exposing Atlantid/Oliver Smith. That's becoming more clear. One thing for sure is that a fucking moron like you would never edit there, let alone sysop.
I wouldn't pretend to, mate. Your 'thede' to use nrx parlance (tribe) chucked you out because you were fucking too autistic for racial realism.

You know you're a lolcow. You keep on coming back for more abuse. You're our fucktoy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FataBataRang
No, it was after studying Boasian anthropology and the modern racial behavior genetics debate.

But "lol mike rhymes with kike" is more your mental level so go with that. Have a nice day.

Look, Mikey... everyone knows that Racism, nationalism, colonialism, etc. were for Boas not so much political-economic phenomenon as they were the result of culture and tradition. And it created a contradiction for Boas, 'cause even though culture defined the object of anthropological study, it was also an obstacle to the cosmopolitan form of knowledge anthropologists hoped to produce.
 
Metapedia is a pretty tight ship and there were some complex issues and unfairness in my banning, not least me exposing Atlantid/Oliver Smith. That's becoming more clear. One thing for sure is that a fucking moron like you would never edit there, let alone sysop.

Excuses, excuses...
 
Look, Mikey... everyone knows that Racism, nationalism, colonialism, etc. were for Boas not so much political-economic phenomenon as they were the result of culture and tradition. And it created a contradiction for Boas, 'cause even though culture defined the object of anthropological study, it was also an obstacle to the cosmopolitan form of knowledge anthropologists hoped to produce.

This is a meaningless word salad. The fundamental issue of Boasian pseudoscience was ignoring genetics and simultaneously creating a false picture of the idyllic "noble savage" to attack Western morality, using fraudulent studies involving cherry picked data and outright fabrication. Culture wasn't simultaneously an object and an obstacle as you write. Darwinian genetic theories are as "cosmopolitan" as Boasian cultural theories. The only difference is that Boasian theories are based on fraudulent data.

I wouldn't pretend to, mate. Your 'thede' to use nrx parlance (tribe) chucked you out because you were fucking too autistic for racial realism.

You know you're a lolcow. You keep on coming back for more abuse. You're our fucktoy.

Garbage. It was for conflict, and I turned out to be correct. You are an insecure loser who calls people names on the internet. You fantasise about "dominating" me, when all you're doing is calling me names anonymously from your mom's basement. You are a classic, classic loser.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is a meaningless word salad. The fundamental issue of Boasian pseudoscience was ignoring genetics and simultaneously creating a false picture of the idyllic "noble savage" to attack Western morality, using fraudulent studies involving cherry picked data and outright fabrication. Culture wasn't simultaneously an object and an obstacle as you write. Darwinian genetic theories are as "cosmopolitan" as Boasian cultural theories. The only difference is that Boasian theories are based on fraudulent data.
Bullshit. It's promoting forms of inequality in which anthropologists and other experts know best what is in other people’s best interests, but also as legitimating certain forms of neo-racism.
 
Boas saying only anthropologists could cultivate a ‘purely analytic’ approach to the study of particular languages and cultures. It enabled them to circumvent the natural tendency to project one’s own categories onto others.

Keep up, Mikey, this is supposed to be your thing.
 
Bullshit. It's promoting forms of inequality in which anthropologists and other experts know best what is in other people’s best interests, but also as legitimating certain forms of neo-racism.

Assuming by "it" you mean Darwinian genetics, yes inequality and racism are inherent in the theory. Because races are not equal. You are simply begging the question by appealing to your fraudulent Boasian anthropologists as "authorities" for your fantasy "equality" belief.

Boas saying only anthropologists could cultivate a ‘purely analytic’ approach to the study of particular languages and cultures. It enabled them to circumvent the natural tendency to project one’s own categories onto others.

Keep up, Mikey, this is supposed to be your thing.

Boas would of course claim to be an objective scientist while engaging in fraudulent cherry picking and fabrication. Can you give an example of a projected category Boas circumvented?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Deviant
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot and JSGOTI
It's all relative. There's no benchmark other than your own perception. No one is god, no one is the benchmark standard unless you hold yourself to be the ultimate authority. In which case you're a nutjob.
 
It's all relative. There's no benchmark other than your own perception. No one is god, no one is the benchmark standard unless you hold yourself to be the ultimate authority. In which case you're a nutjob.

I didn't ask for a benchmark standard. You said the races were "equal" and this seemed very obviously false. I mean it's just trivially a stupid thing to say, based on emotion rather than logic. Do races have the same immune response and altitude tolerance? IQ? Skin color? Presumably it's "all relative" and we should forget scientific measurement and sit there staring into space. Is the thrust of a jet engine "all relative" too? Is the ability to read an arbitrary benchmark? How about the ability to do quantum physics?

Common courtesy.

Exactly. You are motivated by social acceptance, not truth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Deviant
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot and JSGOTI
I didn't ask for a benchmark standard. You said the races were "equal" and this seemed very obviously false. I mean it's just trivially a stupid thing to say, based on emotion rather than logic. Do races have the same immune response and altitude tolerance? IQ? Skin color? Presumably it's "all relative" and we should forget scientific measurement and sit there staring into space. Is the thrust of a jet engine "all relative" too? Is the ability to read an arbitrary benchmark? How about the ability to do quantum physics?
Being of a particular race doesn't prevent people from being anything, in a perfect vacuum. You know, outside of shitty diatribes like yours, racism in general, and cultural upbringing.
 
Being of a particular race doesn't prevent people from being anything, in a perfect vacuum. You know, outside of shitty diatribes like yours, racism in general, and cultural upbringing.

You are just parroting "feel good" platitudes and your fantasy position is contradicted by the data.
 
  • Deviant
  • Dumb
Reactions: Begemot and JSGOTI
Back