Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Obviously you morons are just being obtuse. But I find it funny you spill so much ink on nonsense.

You're calling us obtuse? You, the sexual harasser, the man who issues death threats over bans, the Holocaust denying Neo-Nazi who refuses evidence when it's presented before him, are calling us obtuse?

"Do you accept a fact" is a prelude to demonstrating a fact.

That makes it a rhetorical question, your aim was to prove a point with the question, regardless of how I answered.

But then you know that and you're just being an asshole, on your forum full of assholes.

You're one to talk about being an asshole on a forum full of assholes

*cough*Stormfront*cough*

I think it really goes go show just how clear the crimes of Jewish anti Whites are when people cannot discuss the issue with even a modicum of integrity.

You have no integrity because you ignored all the evidence provided by @Vitriol & remained willfully ignorant of the facts presented to you that the Holocaust actually happened. When asked to provide evidence for your case, you provided a rhetorical question and refused to simply summarize your retarded conspiracy theory.

 

[Mikemikev]

How dare we demand sources and reasons as well as the initial assertion. Hell, I even gave you a freebie to play with for this apologia and you reply with sobbing since you know you have nothing.

Said the man who provides generic graphs and misuses words on purpose because he knows he has no case.

I asked a simple yes or no question regarding whether a fact was accepted and I got bullshit in response. There can be no debate with such trash.

What's really funny is how many months you losers have spent on this thread, all because of a lying ED article written by people who were butthurt at losing to me.

 

[Adamska]

You have no integrity because you ignored all the evidence provided by @Vitriol & remained willfully ignorant of the facts presented to you that the Holocaust actually happened. When asked to provide evidence for your case, you provided a rhetorical question and refused to simply summarize your retarded conspiracy theory.

Fun fact: a summary of a viewpoint is commonly written in scientific and research driven papers. Why? So people will know what the fuck it's about before going into it. His lack of understanding even this shows his ignorance on many things, including how to present a case.

And again: stop being dishonest with your word choice. Facts are indisputable; you have yet to demonstrate or try to demonstrate the whole kikespiracy you have and why its proven beyond a doubt.

 

[chimpburgers]

I asked a simple yes or no question regarding whether a fact was accepted and I got bullshit in response. There can be no debate with such trash.

What's really funny is how many months you losers have spent on this thread, all because of a lying ED article written by people who were butthurt at losing to me.

Thread was made three months ago and most of the new posts in here are from this month. You were admittedly good at staying under the radar until some of that sperginess of yours show through with your squabble with Atlantid. You know, Atlantid is now whining about me to Vordrak. Did ya hear?

 

[Luminous Being]

I asked a simple yes or no question regarding whether a fact was accepted and I got bullshit in response. There can be no debate with such trash.

What's really funny is how many months you losers have spent on this thread, all because of a lying ED article written by people who were butthurt at losing to me.

If you assert something to be a fact without backing it up, and ask people that seemingly disagree with you on everything, you would be safe in assuming that they DO NOT believe your claim.

Your question was meaningless from the beginning.

 

[Mikemikev]

You're one to talk about being an asshole on a forum full of assholes

*cough*Stormfront*cough*

The people on Stormfront are of far higher quality than the sociopathic garbage here, intellectually and morally.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I asked a simple yes or no question regarding whether a fact was accepted and I got bullshit in response. There can be no debate with such trash.

No, when I asked you to summarize your retarded conspiracy theory, you gave me the bullshit response of asking a rhetorical question. I don't have to give a yes or no to that bullshit question because that's not what I asked you to do.

What's really funny is how many months you losers have spent on this thread, all because of a lying ED article written by people who were butthurt at losing to me.

Said the faggot who created literal hundreds of alts to vandalize Wikipedia.

 

[Luminous Being]

The people on Stormfront are of far higher quality than the sociopathic garbage here, intellectually and morally.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

The people on Stormfront are of far higher quality than the sociopathic garbage here, intellectually and morally.

Because they're your asspatters.

 

[Mikemikev]

No, when I asked you to summarize your retarded conspiracy theory, you gave me the bullshit response of asking a rhetorical question. I don't have to give a yes or no to that bullshit question because that's not what I asked you to do.

Said the faggot who created literal hundreds of alts to vandalize Wikipedia.

You will call all questions rhetorical to avoid them. You are a mentally defective person.

Wikipedia is a website of some importance, unlike this one. My edits there were sincere. You are a slanderer.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

You will call all questions rhetorical to avoid them.

You will continue this argument to avoid summarizing your conspiracy theory.

You are a mentally defective person.

Said the conspiracy theorist.

Wikipedia is a website of some importance, unlike this one.

Which is exactly why you're not allowed there.

 

[Mikemikev]

Fun fact: a summary of a viewpoint is commonly written in scientific and research driven papers. Why? So people will know what the fuck it's about before going into it. His lack of understanding even this shows his ignorance on many things, including how to present a case.

And again: stop being dishonest with your word choice. Facts are indisputable; you have yet to demonstrate or try to demonstrate the whole kikespiracy you have and why its proven beyond a doubt.

When I ask whether a fact is accepted I am told the question is rhetorical. So it is not possible to go beyond that point. So we are done.

 

[Adamska]

You will call all questions rhetorical to avoid them. You are a mentally defective person.

Wikipedia is a website of some importance, unlike this one. My edits there were sincere. You are a slanderer.

Write an abstract on the kikespiracy. List your details first. This is not hard unless you have none of these things.

And again you're retarded with words: first the term is libel due to @MarvinTheParanoidAndroid writing about you; slander is spoken dummy. Secondly, the statements have to be false, and these sure ain't false statements considering our documentation of your faggotry.

Also facts are indisputable. You haven't even started to display why the kikespiracy is that.

 

[Alberto Balsalm]

Wikipedia is a website of some importance, unlike this one. My edits there were sincere. You are a slanderer.

The White House is more important than the local McDonalds, but if I tried to spraypaint a dick hundreds of times on either one, it would be equally retarded.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

When I ask whether a fact is accepted

Right there, with this sentence, you have just proven that it was rhetorical. "Do you accept this fact?" is the definitive rhetorical question.

I am told the question is rhetorical.

Because it is.

So it is not possible to go beyond that point.

Sure it is. All you have to do is summarize your faggoty conspiracy theory, which is what I asked for in the first place.

So we are done.

lol No we're not. You'll be right back here in say, thirty minutes. Tops.

 

[Luminous Being]

When I ask whether a fact is accepted I am told the question is rhetorical. So it is not possible to go beyond that point. So we are done.

Why do you start an argument by asking if the person you are talking to accepts your claim? You are arguing because they obviously DO NOT agree with your statement.

If you ask someone "Do you think the Jews are behind X?" and they answer "Show me proof of that." then they have indirectly answered "No!". Every normal human being would be able to infer the answer from the demand of proof.

 

[Mikemikev]

Thread was made three months ago and most of the new posts in here are from this month. You were admittedly good at staying under the radar until some of that sperginess of yours show through with your squabble with Atlantid. You know, Atlantid is now whining about me to Vordrak. Did ya hear?

The irony is that the morons on this forum are the spergiest of all.

I don't understand why all of you people are here typing this nonsense. It isn't funny at all. You find typing this funny?

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

You are a slanderer.

No I'm not. All the things I called you are verifiable in the OP with screen shots of your forum activity and testimony of other users you've encountered.

 

[Mikemikev]

Why do you start an argument by asking if the person you are talking to accepts your claim? You are arguing because they obviously DO NOT agree with your statement.

If you ask someone "Do you think the Jews are behind X?" and they answer "Show me proof of that." then they have indirectly answered "No!". Every normal human being would be able to infer the answer from the demand of proof.

But I wasn't answered "show me proof of that", which I would have done. I was told the question was rhetorical.

 

[chimpburgers]

I don't understand why all of you people are here typing this nonsense. It isn't funny at all. You find typing this funny?

I included your most recent line into random.txt if that makes you feel better sweetie.