Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[Pointless Pedant]

Wow you know so much. Wanna try that on a neutral board? Thought not.

There aren't a lot of boards who are neutral in an argument between exceptional neo Nazis and people who make fun of them.

 

[Mikemikev]

There aren't a lot of boards who are neutral in an argument between exceptional neo Nazis and people who make fun of them.

But you've assumed all neo Nazis are retar.ded when I'm actually much smarter than you.

 

[YankeeTrader]

But you've assumed all neo Nazis are retar.ded when I'm actually much smarter than you.

x ∞

 

[FataBataRang]

But you've assumed all neo Nazis are retar.ded when I'm actually much smarter than you.

YOU, smarter than @Pointless Pedant? Holy shit that's fucking hilarious, shorty. I guess that little joke was your birthday present for me. Thanks, "champ".

 

[AnOminous]

But you've assumed all neo Nazis are retar.ded when I'm actually much smarter than you.

 

[MistressCaridad]

As I was sitting here catching up on this thread I realized who Mikey reminds me of- it's Onision. Both are spergy, crazy eyed manchildren who never leave their houses and argue obsessively on the internet using "FACTS" they pulled out of their asses... when unable to provide citations of said "FACTS" they both chimp out, resort to grade school name calling ("lol ur fat and ugly") and then smugly proclaim themselves the winner. Oh yeah, add to that the attraction to pubescent girls (I think Mikey likes girls?? Yes? No??). About the only difference is Gurg isn't into all the neo Nazi stuff, as far as I know.

 

[FataBataRang]

That's actually a really neat song. Cool! This day just keeps getting better and better.

 

[unclestryker]

(I think Mikey likes girls?? Yes? No??).

Yeah I think Mikey likes girls, but one condition they have to be under sixteen years old.

 

[Cato]

argue obsessively on the internet using "FACTS" they pulled out of their asses... when unable to provide citations of said "FACTS"

The thing is, in any debate with @Mikemikev, the burden of proof is always, always, always on the other person.

Oh, and if his opponent provides said proof, Mike will respond with a nonsequitor or ad hominem that he'll pretend is a devastating refutation, and call his opponent a "liar" and refuse to respond to them further.

 

[Mikemikev]

YOU, smarter than @Pointless Pedant? Holy shit that's fucking hilarious, shorty. I guess that little joke was your birthday present for me. Thanks, "champ".

Today is your birthday?

The thing is, in any debate with @Mikemikev, the burden of proof is always, always, always on the other person.

Yeah right. Because you would have no chance in a fair debate.

 

[Loxiozzz]

Still can't read I see.

 

[MistressCaridad]

if his opponent provides said proof, Mike will respond with a nonsequitor or ad hominem that he'll pretend is a devastating refutation, and call his opponent a "liar" and refuse to respond to them further.

Yeah, I've noticed that. All those damn fat ugly basement dwelling Jewish victim blaming liars just can't match up to Mikey's superior intellect and advanced ideologies, amirite?

 

[Cato]

Yeah right. Because you would have no chance in a fair debate.

So if I understand what you've written correctly; you're such a master-debater that you'd destroy us in fair debates, therefore it is appropriate that the burden of proof would be shifted to us?

That's not how handicapping works...usually the handicap is supposed to work against the stronger party.

 

[Mikemikev]

Yeah, I've noticed that. All those damn fat ugly basement dwelling Jewish victim blaming liars just can't match up to Mikey's superior intellect and advanced ideologies, amirite?

Yes!

So if I understand what you've written correctly; you're such a master-debater that you'd destroy us in fair debates, therefore it is appropriate that the burden of proof would be shifted to us?

That's not how handicapping works...usually the handicap is supposed to work against the stronger party.

A debater with honor wouldn't resort to "us". Would you like to debate me?

 

[sbm1990]

But you've assumed all neo Nazis are retar.ded when I'm actually much smarter than you.

Lol this midget clown can't even say retard the right way. lol ur retarded.

 

[MistressCaridad]

you're such a master-debater

Thank you for making my inner seventh grader cackle out loud.

 

[Cato]

A debater with honor wouldn't resort to "us". Would you like to debate me?

I was using plural form in the post that you had responded to, which I, in turn, quoted from you. I inferred your use of "you" to be referring to all of your opponents here generally, not me specifically...because that's how English grammar works. Reading comprehension and logic aren't your strong suits (I mean, I'm not sure if you have any strong suits, but whatever).

I've tried "debating" you, and your response made no sense whatsoever (to recap; I pointed out that individual variations in IQ were more far significant than variations between groups, and you responded by ranting about your perception that black people are racist). We even had a second go at it, where I explicitly pointed out that your response the previous time was a non sequitur, and yet you repeated the same response again. I have no desire to repeat that. You know that old cliche about the definition of insanity?

 

[Mikemikev]

I was using plural form in the post that you had responded to, which I, in turn, quoted from you. I inferred your use of "you" to be referring to all of your opponents here generally, not me specifically...because that's how English grammar works. Reading comprehension and logic aren't your strong suits (I mean, I'm not sure if you have any strong suits, but whatever).

I've tried "debating" you, and your response made no sense whatsoever (to recap; I pointed out that individual variations in IQ were more far significant than variations between groups, and you responded by ranting about your perception that black people are racist). We even had a second go at it, where I explicitly pointed out that your response the previous time was a non sequitur, and yet you repeated the same response again. I have no desire to repeat that. You know that old cliche about the definition of insanity?

No I mean a real audio debate. Could you handle that?

 

[Cato]

No I mean a real audio debate. Could you handle that?

It's actually tempting just to hear your voice spouting all of this, but I think I'd need to seriously reflect on my life if I found myself devoting precious free time to chatting about phrenology with a batshit insane neo-Nazi over skype. It's fun pointing and laughing at you here but I just feel that what you're suggesting would cross a line and make me a cow too.

Besides, like I said, regardless of the format, I already gave you more than one chance to have an intelligent discussion and you weren't interested. You can't legitimately say I didn't try. I've moved on from devoting any effort to attempting that. I'm sure you will take this as a victory in your own little mind, but I'm not really bothered by that.

 

[WeeGee]

It's actually tempting just to hear your voice spouting all of this, but I think I'd need to seriously reflect on my life if I found myself devoting previous free time to chatting about phrenology with a batshit insane neo-Nazi over skype. It's fun pointing and laughing at you here but I just feel that what you're suggesting would cross a line and make me a cow too.

Besides, like I said, regardless of the format, I already gave you more than one chance to have an intelligent discussion and you weren't interested. You can't legitimately say I didn't try. I've moved on from devoting any effort to attempting that. I'm sure you will take this as a victory in your own little mind, but I'm not really bothered by that.

It's not worth playing chess with a pigeon anyway, he'd just tell you all your points are wrong regardless.