- Joined
- Apr 29, 2016
The goy is back! And he has a friend!
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You couldn't even defend or show any evidence towards your kikespiracy and cried about people not accepting your bullshit face value. In your position, your role would have been to present the evidence you have to show and explain why your point is the case, which you never goddamned did.
The tryhard wiener put more effort into it, and his was mostly A-> B causation fallacy stuff, so going back to that and actually going through with it'd be a grand start.
You should have fucked off after your threadban. I find you very tedious, repetitive and boring now. You got anything else to say?But you say that because you're liar. You'll always respond with "lol u failed u r stupid", whatever I do, because you're a dishonest sociopathic bastard with no principles. Ironically it's you that needs provide evidence for the holocaust. Needless to say you won't be able to.
You should have fucked off after your threadban. I find you very tedious, repetitive and boring now. You got anything else to say?
But you say that because you're a liar. You'll always respond with "lol u failed u r stupid", whatever I do, because you're a dishonest sociopathic bastard with no principles. Ironically it's you that needs provide evidence for the holocaust. Needless to say you won't be able to.
I'm busy with real cows like @Thomas Jay Wasserberg atm. I'm sorry you're jealous that I give more attention to crazies that really deserve it.I am I supposed to entertain you, you stupid arsehole?
I'm busy with real cows like @Thomas Jay Wasserberg atm. I'm sorry you're jealous that I give more attention to crazies that really deserve it.
Yes, that's all you're good for.Am I supposed to entertain you, you stupid arsehole?
But you say that because you're a liar. You'll always respond with "lol u failed u r stupid", whatever I do, because you're a dishonest sociopathic bastard with no principles. ...
Ironic.
Nope, when the default position for the audience is that "Holocaust happened", it's up to you to provide the burden of proof to shift the conclusion to your idea. You're the one laying charges, so ergo you need to do it yourself.But you say that because you're a liar. You'll always respond with "lol u failed u r stupid", whatever I do, because you're a dishonest sociopathic bastard with no principles. Ironically it's you that needs provide evidence for the holocaust. Needless to say you won't be able to.
Nope, when the default position for the audience is that "Holocaust happened", it's up to you to provide the burden of proof to shift the conclusion to your idea. You're the one laying charges, so ergo you need to do it yourself.
But again, I know that you are well aware that you have no case.
We already provided our evidence in this thread weeks ago. You're the only one who's continued to assert his claim without referring to any evidence.I understand that the default position for the audience is full ret@rd, but in philosophical systems outside the insane, something is not postulated to exist without evidence. You are admitting now that you believe something based on zero evidence?
There is more than zero evidence for the Holocaust. The only reason you don't go with what is, in fact, rational in this situation is that you also seem to believe that A) Jews are evil and/or control everything, and B) you believe that the Nazis, who were responsible for the Holocaust, weren't such bad people. (They, as any rational person knows, were such bad people).I understand that the default position for the audience is full ret@rd, but in philosophical systems outside the insane, something is not postulated to exist without evidence. You are admitting now that you believe something based on zero evidence?
I understand that the default position for the audience is full ret@rd, but in philosophical systems outside the insane, something is not postulated to exist without evidence. You are admitting now that you believe something based on zero evidence?
We already provided our evidence in this thread weeks ago. You're the only one who's continued to assert his claim without referring to any evidence.
The best debate I had was with Vitriol and all he had was an asserted number from a Jewish source. It was extremely lame, although not as bad as the attempt to discuss behavior genetics of race and intelligence. Of course after this pathetic effort your board members will be all like "lol we wun the debate u r autism". Morons.
There is more than zero evidence for the Holocaust. The only reason you don't go with what is, in fact, rational in this situation is that you also seem to believe that A) Jews are evil and/or control everything, and B) you believe that the Nazis, who were responsible for the Holocaust, weren't such bad people. (They, as any rational person knows, were such bad people).