- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
Incorrect, sir. I come out with this based on the assumption that you are a sudsy, less-alcoholic version of my good friend and former gay lover Marijan Siklic, about whom I should tell you racked up a higher score than yours when he discovered his thread. This assumption gives me an idea of what I might dictate unto you in this veritable battle of wits that would surely have us both banned from Wikipedia, though I've the decency to stop at three bans. So, answer me this, mate, is your tactic when arguing with good folk on the internet always to resort to petty you-know-nothings in a vain attempt to defeat your opponent? Bully for you if it is, but my good man, if I have no idea what I'm going to do, then by all intents and purposes, you've no idea what I'm going to do. Strange, isn't it? Also, you should really consider not using the word "literally" in an improper place like that; it could metaphorically be the literal bane of your hyperbolic accusations.
This is gibberish which avoids my request for you to back up your claims. You are talking shit with literally zero backup.
Last edited by a moderator: