Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%
  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%

  • Total voters
    559
Why would any sane person debate this 2bit tin hat fraud?

The Nazis meticulously filmed, photo'd and documented their actions. Arguing against their own records is like believeing 9/11 was an inside job or fluorine in the water causes the gay.

Jebson was an insane racist who believed ones environment has no effect on ones iq. Most modern studies dispute this and find a correlation between poverty and iq. A higher proportion of blacks in poverty then explains the iq gap. This is why amongst wealthy blacks the iq gap vanishes abd why it seems to have shrunk since its initial discovery. There doesn't seem to be much point directing you to sources given you have clearly made up your mind but for those interested the wiki article is OK for a general outline.

Is this the manlet who kept getting kicked off Wikipedia before someone grassed him up to his parents?
 
I have a feeling if Mike ever met Henry Flescher in the flesh, he'd call him an attention whore who got the tattoos to try and prove that the Holocaust was real, when it was really him doing the killing because.. Judaism, I guess.

You're scum, Mike.
 
This is fun. So many idiotic moles to whack. Where can I view these records?
The nuremburg trial went through them in detail but I believe many are still on display in the Hague and you should be able to order copies from the peace palace or the US national archives.

The trial transcript can be ordered here: http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/php/docs_swi.php?DI=1&text=doc_anal

Edit: looks like the above site has stopped supplying transcripts. The national archive should still.

The video evidence presented here:https://www.ushmm.org/online/film/display/detail.php?file_num=2170
 
I'm waiting for you to drop Kevin MacDonald videos as a so-called "credible" source for your ideas. How about some David Duke, Don Black or gasp, the infamous Ernst Zundel?

One of my retarded and laughable opponents told me he had never read an adoption study, so I referred him to a paper which references several. Do you have some kind of point you would like to make?
 
The nuremburg trial went through them in detail but I believe many are still on display in the Hague and you should be able to arder copies from the peace palace or the US national archives.

The trial transcript can be ordered here: http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/php/docs_swi.php?DI=1&text=doc_anal

The video evidence presented here:https://www.ushmm.org/online/film/display/detail.php?file_num=2170

You mean your so called "video evidence" is torture extracted testimony?

Ever read the Minnesota twin studies paper before?

Of course.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why would any sane person debate this 2bit tin hat fraud?

The Nazis meticulously filmed, photo'd and documented their actions. Arguing against their own records is like believeing 9/11 was an inside job or fluorine in the water causes the gay.

I guess you retract this one.

The video is of the trial viewing the nazi videos. The archives include the orders issued for the destruction of the Jews. You can see these in the Hague. So no.

Cool! I presume you've been to the Hague to see this evidence no one else can? Could they photo it and put it on the internet? Would presenting evidence be like another Holocaust?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess you retract this one.
Not at all- you can view the videos at the peace palace or the link above.

Cool! I presume you've been to the Hague to see this evidence no one else can?
Its open to the public, they have an exhibition.

And yes, I have seen the footage.
 
Not at all- you can view the videos at the peace palace or the link above.

Its open to the public, they have an exhibition.

And yes, I have seen the footage.

You said there was video of actions. You must retract that if you cannot reference any. Your references are so vague as to be absurd. "It's in the Hague". You are a joke.

Don't tell me you also believe that those Holocaust pictures of those shrunken heads are fake too right? How do you debunk this?

Why would you believe they were real? Have you ever heard of atrocity propaganda?
 
You said there was video of actions. You must retract that if you cannot reference any. Your references are so vague as to be absurd. "It's in the Hague". You are a joke.



Why would you believe they were real? Have you ever heard of atrocity propaganda?
I'm sorry I didn't realise you were a child- I specified twice now that I am referring to the peace palace in the hague. If you don't know what that is perhaps you should never have left sussex polytec.
Why would you believe they were real? Have you ever heard of atrocity propaganda?
So I've offered proof it was real- the thousands of documents at nuremberg along with the nazi footage all of which can be accessed at the peace palace in the hague or via the national archives in the US. The burden of proof is now on you to prove they are fake. Otherwise job done, I win.
 
Back