Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%
  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%

  • Total voters
    559
I counted six times so far that he's said he's done. I love his pathological need to have the last word. My suggestion is to make sure you don't fall into a repeat argument, like his Holocaust denial. He's already tried arguing that around the early pages and has not made any points since then.
 
I counted six times so far that he's said he's done. I love his pathological need to have the last word. My suggestion is to make sure you don't fall into a repeat argument, like his Holocaust denial. He's already tried arguing that around the early pages and has not made any points since then.

He hasn't made any points at all, but has convinced me to become Jewish.

Shalom.
 
After reading several pages of watching Mike flog the same spiel over and over again, he has yet again confirmed he can't really argue his case without first expecting the people he tries to convince to accept several things as self-evident fact first.

If that doesn't happen, he tard rages and insults people.

The sad part is that one of his arguments is critically flawed from the get go, the one about how Jewish propaganda causes immigration of non whites which lead to white genocide.

There is no logical connection to be drawn between any of the three topics unless you accept as "fact" from the get go Jews are evil overlords who control the media and that immigration is a tool for reducing the white population. Not accepting either premise as fact from the start means he has no argument he can defend.
 
Aut's already back, they were active a few hours ago.

Will be interesting to hear their thoughts on this guy though.
Did you see the blog post Aut had about the terms and conditions of debate? He explains what his problem is with Mikemikev. A lot of it is rooted in how he made such a fool out of himself on Metapedia, a site that Aut really loves.
 
Since his answer to whether social class and upbringing affects performance in adulthood intelligence metrics was a simple 'Fuck off' I'm going to be forced to conclude that given his extrapolation from the racial discrepancies in such results to the conclusion that blacks are inherently intellectually inferior, I'm forced to point out that his own apparent reasoning leads to the conclusion that Jews are in fact superior beings.

IQADD.bmp
>whole-scale IQ data
>not using broken-down functional sub-sectional data which proves Jewish verbose proclivities and East Asian performance bias
Mikemikev may be a moron, but that was simply lazy.

I've returned. Unthreadban him, @Alan Pardew?
 
That feeling when you pop away for a few hours and a thread gets 100 replies. Goddamn it.
So you spend your life on the internet typing bullshit? Why?
Holy shit, can you PLEASE not point big-ass projectors at mirrors? They have very luminous arc lights in them, you know. All that light is not a pleasant thing in a small room.
Edit: grammar
 
I can also tell that he knows he's full of shit too, since unlike normal conspiracy theorists, he couldn't bother to link anything together and give at least a few sources and claims, thus creating a narrative.

I also like how he assumes that the thread will stop being interesting without him, even though the whole 'mocking his debate style' thing is only fun a few pages at a time.

I'm just waiting for the alts now.

No, I just have a lot of experience debating disingenuous trolls so you throw something simple out, something yes or no, and if you get back sophistic bullshit you don't waste your time.

Like:

"Were Jews overrepresented in the New Labour immigration team?"

"That's a rhetorical question"

Why debate such nonsense.

great now @Autphag and @Mikemikev can be dumb and boring to each other

Whereas you're a really exciting person worth looking at.

After reading several pages of watching Mike flog the same spiel over and over again, he has yet again confirmed he can't really argue his case without first expecting the people he tries to convince to accept several things as self-evident fact first.

If that doesn't happen, he tard rages and insults people.

The sad part is that one of his arguments is critically flawed from the get go, the one about how Jewish propaganda causes immigration of non whites which lead to white genocide.

There is no logical connection to be drawn between any of the three topics unless you accept as "fact" from the get go Jews are evil overlords who control the media and that immigration is a tool for reducing the white population. Not accepting either premise as fact from the start means he has no argument he can defend.

Not at all. I simply asked whether something was accepted as fact and got nonsense for my troubles. There is no point debating trolls.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Answer this simple question for me @Mikemikev:
Could you show me, what was your body of contributions to the Metapedia corpus? It can't have been more than an oozing corepussle which had long been popped of its lacking substance if you'd even been ejected from something usually as open to dissonant consensus as there.

No I wouldn't bother doing something like that.

i don't have a lolcow thread, sooooo you're right, no reason to laugh at me, dullard

Who are you? What is your position on White genocide?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back