In this place the consensus would say most people here would be accepting of me, at the very least.
You know absolutely nothing about my background or knowledge base, frankly, you're being rude like a typical BAMN activist.
Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly
- Thread starter chimpburgers
- Start date
In this place the consensus would say most people here would be accepting of me, at the very least.
You know absolutely nothing about my background or knowledge base, frankly, you're being rude like a typical BAMN activist.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
Yeah that's why you post here, all of your e-friends will automatically your dumbass opinion over the "cow", no matter how patently fucking stupid you are. You're an insecure loser. So were you just pretending to have no understanding of even the word heritability? Were you just pretending when you called me a Nazi then refused to even look at what so called Nazis think? I think we all know you weren't. So hide behind your "powerlevel" faggot. You're an utter fool. Have fun with that as you go through life.
Explain how he was discredited? Are we to believe that you are unable to refute Nazism?
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
@Mikemikev - To your credit, one thing you're actually often right about is that argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy and being a designated "cow" puts you at a disadvantage where public opinion here is concerned but that doesn't make you wrong. (It's your shitty arguments, or lack of any arguments, and chimping out that accomplishes that. And you're wrong to flip that fallacy around and extrapolate from the existence of a bandwagon against you to that somehow automatically making you right...but these aren't the points I wanted to make, I just felt the need to strongly and carefully qualify what I'm actually giving you credit for.)
With that said, @chekovia was responding to your assertion that "nobody cares what [he] thinks." So this is actually a case where other people's opinion of him is clearly and directly relevant, and you're the one who brought it up.
Who is the "stupid" and "foolish" one again?
With that said, @chekovia was responding to your assertion that "nobody cares what [he] thinks." So this is actually a case where other people's opinion of him is clearly and directly relevant, and you're the one who brought it up.
Who is the "stupid" and "foolish" one again?
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
His uni has disassociated itself from his works (http://www.daily49er.com/news/2008/...isassociates-itself-from-professor-macdonald/) and he was notably the only supporter of David Irving when the latter was found guilty of Holocaust denial (http://web.csulb.edu/~d49er/archives/2004/spring/news/volLIVno119-civil.shtml); he's also apparently cited the Talmud incorrectly when writing his kooky theories (https://jhate.wordpress.com/2011/03/12/kevin-macdonald-is-hilarious/).
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
The truth isn't a popularity contest so the vote of some cat lady professors who undoubtedly didn't even bother to look at his work is irrelevant. You dismissed it without reading right? In fact you're doing that now. It's something I would never do and suggests very low academic standards.
He supported David Irving? Whether or not Irving was right, which he was, that's not an argument. The truth isn't ruled in court and "associciating with someone who was wrong about something" doesn't invalidate anything you say.
Can you summarize the error of quoting? Just we know you understand what you're talking about and aren't just googling and copy pasting links regarding things you know nothing about.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
I would, but you just ignore any posts, or elements of posts, which irrefutably show you to be wrong or stupid. The fact that you didn't quote or address me pointing out that you brought up how others perceive @chekovia and then mocked him for addressing how he's perceived as a direct response to you is a great example of this.
LOL
(Normally I wouldn't share PM's publicly, but I think I can ethically make an exception in this case.)
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
No posts show me to be wrong. You just assert it. The posts here are "u r wrong u r stupid". Which is the essence of your posts too. I've no idea what your second sentence even means. Why would I quote you when pointing out the self evident fact that the trolls here automatically agree with each other?
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
This is in reference to your post on my profile.
So now you're going to pretend a response to your power levelling e-buddy applies to you, because your incapable of explaining how an alleged misinterpretation of a quote in a blog post refutes a book length analysis of Jewish monopoly in academia in politics?
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
Tu quoque, Mikey?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
It's a parody of you!
Lol what a fucking ignoramus. Go back to refuting Chris-chan's latest Facebook post.
Hint, when trolling someone you're supposed to make them look stupid.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
Yes, race does matter, but not as much as you think.
Let's say Jews do act as a cultural and political bloc and have done so as an adaptive process, so do lots of other middleman minorities. Their intermarriage rates in the U.S have been affected by the very Liberalism they created. Their birthrates, aside from hasidim, are the same as white Liberal birthrates: below replacement. Nobody escapes a dysgenic culture, Mike.
That applies to you as well, kid, you're a ranting degenerate. The problem here is you're enraged continually at everybody here while still halfheartedly trying to get acolytes for Stormfront. We've all seen your internet history, you're a strange little gnome that spergs out in public, that's your thing...I guess. I's pretty sad, actually.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
You can choose whether you want to discuss issues or engage in playground name calling. My guess is you finish with the latter because you don't do so well on the former. Which is it to be?
That's not a choice I need to make, frankly. I can do both.
Every time people have tried to corner you on race you run away into insults and denials. You seem to believe that race is a zero sum game. People are affected by their surroundings, Mike, pretending that the consequences of slavery and Jim Crow racism haven't created dysgenic black communities in the U.S does you no favours.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
Of course you can do both. And you do it because nobody is going to address you rationally when you end by spewing mindless abuse. And then of course you accuse me of doing exactly what you are doing. Feel free to repost that without the insults and I'll respond to it.
So the format of your posts is:
1) Dumbass ignoramus point
2) Mindless personal abuse so the stupidity is not refuted
Like if I wrote to a physics professor
"I think you're wrong force equals mass times acceleration. Because my mom pushes a shopping trolley and the acceleration is the same if she is tired.
And you are always tired because you are a weak stupid faggot and you are one foot tall and you have autism you are angry and you fuck animals."
and then claimed to be correct about dynamic physics when he didn't respond.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2016
is our favourite jewslim getting better
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016