- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
I developed my worldview independently and don't speak for my parents. That it's normal for males to be attracted to postpubescent females is a published psychology finding.
Can you tell us whether you think racism and the normality of attraction near the age of consent are both false, and explain why?
Surprisingly civil of you, so I'll roll with this.
-I already stated that I'll actually accept the existence of IQ variations between racial groups, but that this actually isn't important because the variation between individuals is much, much more pronounced than the variation between groups, to the point where it only makes sense to evaluate people as individuals. This is my worldview beyond discussions about IQ though; I am an individualist and not a collectivist so racism is fundamentally incompatible with my basic way of thinking. This enters into a much broader philosophical argument, so I'm just leave it at that point about IQ. I raised this before and you responded with a non-sequitur about how "blacks" are racist and therefore this somehow justifies you being racist (which didn't actually address my argument at all).
-I'll also actually grant that, from a purely biological standpoint, you're correct that attraction to post-pubescent females is "natural" (that's the term I'd prefer to use instead of "normal"). What I take issue with is that you have repeatedly conflated this with it being ethically and/or socially acceptable, which is an appeal to nature fallacy.
What do your parents think of you being a white nationalist, if they don't share your views?