Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%
  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%

  • Total voters
    559
Spare us the pretentious nitpicking.

For someone who likes to pretend to be educated and proud of it, your contempt for even attempting to understand basic legal principles and terms (while throwing them around as threats) is extremely ignorant and moronic.

Since I'm sure you didn't understand what @Poor Choices was getting at: libel is written, slander is spoken. I had actually internally debated adding that one to my FYI post about defamation.
 
I don't know what world you live in where you think they cannot be charged with harassment and slander.

Most of the world, including much of the EU (practically speaking), does not allow for criminal prosecutions of libel. Harassment simply isn't what you think it is.

FYI to sound more impotently threatening in the future use the term libel instead of slander.

He's been told this at least dozens of times, he's too dense to understand that the legal world depends on technical definitions and not his revenge fantasies. I had assumed his shitposting was forcibly confined to his own thread though.
 
For someone who likes to pretend to be educated and proud of it, your contempt for even attempting to understand basic legal principles and terms (while throwing them around as threats) is extremely ignorant and moronic.

Since I'm sure you didn't understand what @Poor Choices was getting at: libel is written, slander is spoken. I had actually internally debated adding that one to my FYI post about defamation.

I'm completely aware of the difference. I tend use the term slander OTI to weed out the nitpicking ignoramuses.

Most of the world, including much of the EU (practically speaking), does not allow for criminal prosecutions of libel. Harassment simply isn't what you think it is.

Good for you! Go ahead with your prosecution of Donny Long.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good for you! Go ahead with your prosecution of Donny Long.

He's not going to be criminally prosecuted for libel. He's going to be civilly sued for libel.

Edit
: So, funny story negating my previous sentence. While US citizens are protected from libel prosecutions from other countries, there are a few states that still allow prosecution if the victim resides in that state. If I were going to libel anyone, I would avoid doing it to anyone- especially a female lawyer (see below)- in those states. Guess what one of those states is? In fact, guess which state is the one that has brought the most libel cases? Yep, Virginia, where Sandford is based. The statute there is archaic and reads, in part:
Any person who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning any female of chaste character, any words derogatory of such female’s character for virtue and chastity, or imputing to such female acts not virtuous and chaste, or who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning another person, any words which from their usual construction and common acceptation are construed as insults and tend to violence and breach of the peace or shall use grossly insulting language to any female of good character or reputation, shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.

Since it's a class 3 misdemeanor it doesn't carry a harsh punishment; $500 maximum, no jail. Much more worthwhile to launch a civil action.

But either way there's a good chance he'll be criminally prosecuted for various other offenses like failing to obey a peace order, contempt of court, etc. when he continues to think he is above the system.

He might also catch a harassment charge if he's actually been contacting these people at their workplaces.
 
Last edited:
He's not going to be criminally prosecuted for libel. He's going to be civilly sued for libel.

Edit
: So, funny story negating my previous sentence. While US citizens are protected from libel prosecutions from other countries, there are a few states that still allow prosecution if the victim resides in that state. If I were going to libel anyone, I would avoid doing it to anyone- especially a female lawyer (see below)- in those states. Guess what one of those states is? In fact, guess which state is the one that has brought the most libel cases? Yep, Virginia, where Sandford is based. The statute there is archaic and reads, in part:


Since it's a class 3 misdemeanor it doesn't carry a harsh punishment; $500 maximum, no jail. Much more worthwhile to launch a civil action.

But either way there's a good chance he'll be criminally prosecuted for various other offenses like failing to obey a peace order, contempt of court, etc. when he continues to think he is above the system.

He might also catch a harassment charge if he's actually been contacting these people at their workplaces.

The crucial point you're missing is that relevant individuals here will be identified.

Just answer the question you turd. It's not that hard. A Stormfag would answer this no problem.

And if we had nothing on you you wouldn't be so bitchy about "slander". Make up your mind.

I'm not bitchy. I just find your impotent name calling amusing.

And no I won't answer your questions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, look! Special needs kid Mike thinks the holocaust wasn't real...
iu

Well- Looks like the nazis were even in on the hoax!
 
Why do you change the subject when you're unable to back up your moronic gibberish?

No-one changed the subject, you mentally-handicapped monkey abortion.
I demanded that you explain why I should take your holohoax claims seriously.

If you lack the reasoning to answer, then kindly go and fap to Himmler's nipples.
 
No-one changed the subject, you mentally-handicapped monkey abortion.
I demanded that you explain why I should take your holohoax claims seriously.

If you lack the reasoning to answer, then kindly go and fap to Himmler's nipples.

You posted a picture of a concentration camp claiming it proved "the holocaust" like some meaningless internet fool.
 
You posted a picture of a concentration camp claiming it proved "the holocaust" like some meaningless internet fool.

Wrong as usual, shitbird.
That is not even close to what I said. Go back and read the post text, please.

No wonder the fascist bully boys kicked your ass out of all their forums.
You are so tragically spastic in the mind that you can't even process basic English.

 
Back