Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Why do you start posts with "so" and then make shit up based on nothing? The word "so" implies some kind of logical sequence based on facts, not making shit up from nothing.

If you notice the "?" symbol at the end of the sentence, that means my statement was in the form of an inquiry. In effect, I was attempting to ascertain if my characterization of you was accurate based upon my personal experiences with other people with similar personality types and personal affectations. As such, I would not be "making shit up" as I had at no point insisted my characterization of you was factual. Rather, I specifically sought clarification on what I did not understand. However, it is indeed accurate to say that there is "some kind of logical sequence" as you're not especially unique and I felt strongly that I could draw a parallel between yourself and the aforementioned previous associations.

 

[Florence]

I've debated this extensively and looked at many sources.

The voices in your head aren't debating partners, Mike. And I doubt you could provide us with any peer-reviewed sources.

 

[Frank Rizzo]

What is it about lolcows like Mike and TJ Church who look like Dick Tracy villains, and almost always have this "I am much more intelligent then you" complex?

You remember how well that worked for Teej....

 

[Curt Sibling]

If you notice the "?" symbol at the end of the sentence, that means my statement was in the form of an inquiry. In effect, I was attempting to ascertain if my characterization of you was accurate based upon my personal experiences with other people with similar personality types and personal affectations. As such, I would not be "making shit up" as I had at no point insisted my characterization of you was factual. Rather, I specifically sought clarification on what I did not understand. However, it is indeed accurate to say that there is "some kind of logical sequence" as you're not especially unique and I felt strongly that I could draw a parallel between yourself and the aforementioned previous associations.

I'm sure the midget will answer this intelligent post with "Huh?" or "What?"

 

[FataBataRang]

If you notice the "?" symbol at the end of the sentence, that means my statement was in the form of an inquiry. In effect, I was attempting to ascertain if my characterization of you was accurate based upon my personal experiences with other people with similar personality types and personal affectations. As such, I would not be "making shit up" as I had at no point insisted my characterization of you was factual. Rather, I specifically sought clarification on what I did not understand. However, it is indeed accurate to say that there is "some kind of logical sequence" as you're not especially unique and I felt strongly that I could draw a parallel between yourself and the aforementioned previous associations.

Don't write so much. It hurts his little neo-nazi brain.

 

[unclestryker]

peer-reviewed sources.

Oh they are peer reviewed, just from 20s and 30s.

 

[CatParty]

I'm attracted to 15 year olds.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

What is it about lolcows like Mike and TJ Church who look like Dick Tracy villains, and almost always have this "I am much more intelligent then you" complex?

You remember how well that worked for Teej....

It's all they have. And it works well for them, since they're literally too stupid to understand when they've been outsmarted.

I'm sure the midget will answer this intelligent post with "Huh?" or "What?"

Hey, he asked. It was only proper for me to respond to in question. If he doesn't understand, that's not my problem.

 

[Mikemikev]

QUOTE="ChurchOfGodBear, post: 2270214, member: 84"]If you notice the "?" symbol at the end of the sentence, that means my statement was in the form of an inquiry. In effect, I was attempting to ascertain if my characterization of you was accurate based upon my personal experiences with other people with similar personality types and personal affectations. As such, I would not be "making shit up" as I had at no point insisted my characterization of you was factual. Rather, I specifically sought clarification on what I did not understand. However, it is indeed accurate to say that there is "some kind of logical sequence" as you're not especially unique and I felt strongly that I could draw a parallel between yourself and the aforementioned previous associations.[/QUOTE]

So (following the data that is your post), in other less pretentious words, the premise of your logic was the crap written by trolls on Kiwi Farms? That was how you gauged my personality type?

 

[Curt Sibling]

@Mikemikev selects a supple young victim for tonight's "bratwurst blast party"...

 

[Frank Rizzo]

It's all they have. And it works well for them, since they're literally too stupid to understand when they've been outsmarted.

It was just endlessly amusing to me when Teej would bust out the "Pshhh, you're all just angry that I'm superior to you in every way" posts, then, we'd see screen shots of him getting pwned on wrestling message boards, and reality would set in...

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

So (following the data that is your post), in other less pretentious words, the premise of your logic was the crap written by trolls on Kiwi Farms? That was how you gauged my personality type?

Not really. I've actually read very little of this thread. What I have read is the past 30 or so pages, mostly of your own posts. The content of those posts does indicate a strong (but superficial) alignment with Nazi rhetoric, and a fairly weak ability to defend your perspective. So I'd say that most of what I think about you, I base on you.

 

[Mikemikev]

Not really. I've actually read very little of this thread. What I have read is the past 30 or so pages, mostly of your own posts. The content of those posts does indicate a strong (but superficial) alignment with Nazi rhetoric, and a fairly weak ability to defend your perspective. So I'd say that most of what I think about you, I base on you.

But you understand this thread is mostly populated by childish contrarian trolls? And mostly consists of me mocking them while refusing to waste my time debating them? How on Earth could you gauge my debating ability from that? Would you like a debate?

 

[FataBataRang]

But you understand this thread is mostly populated by childish contrarian trolls? And mostly consists of me mocking them while refusing to waste my time debating them? How on Earth could you gauge my debating ability from that? Would you like a debate?

Yes, please. Show us how you handle a "debate".

 

[Frank Rizzo]

But you understand this thread is mostly populated by childish contrarian trolls? And mostly consists of me mocking them while refusing to waste my time debating them? How on Earth could you gauge my debating ability from that? Would you like a debate?

I kind of have the suspicion that, if this were true, this thread wouldn't be 474 pages. You'd have left a long time ago.

 

[Mikemikev]

Not really. I've actually read very little of this thread. What I have read is the past 30 or so pages, mostly of your own posts. The content of those posts does indicate a strong (but superficial) alignment with Nazi rhetoric, and a fairly weak ability to defend your perspective. So I'd say that most of what I think about you, I base on you.

Check this for a better idea.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/evidence-for-the-holocaust.317262/
The analysis of the original German Eichmann interview is interesting, as is the Bialystok rail gauge.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

But you understand this thread is mostly populated by childish contrarian trolls? And mostly consists of me mocking them while refusing to waste my time debating them? How on Earth could you gauge my debating ability from that? Would you like a debate?

It's really not relevant who else populates this thread, you're the subject so I was focusing on you.

If you would care to debate a topic of your choice, that would be fine. You can do so here or via PM, whichever is easier.

 

[FemalePresident]

A day in the life of @Mikemikev :

Wakes up at 5 a.m.; first thing he does is check his thread on KiwiFarms and argue with someone. Then his mother serves him breakfast: Coffee and pancakes. He rejects bacon once again!
Then Mike spends the rest of the morning arguing in his thread, saying things like "get a life kikes, I have a job".

Lunch time. Mike eats some junk food while making sockpuppets on Wikipedia and RationalWiki. After a few hours, he goes to Stormfront where he is ignored and ridiculed by Neo-Nazis. Mike desperately wants to be part of them, but they reject him constantly.
Then Mike decides to check his thread on KiwiFarms again. He manages to add five more pages by acting as autistic as always. He says "bye kikes, I have an important meeting", and goes to some forum to harass minors and ask for sex.

He has junk food for dinner while checking his thread again. Spends a few hours yelling at people on the internet, and around midnight he goes to sleep. And this keeps going on everyday.

 

[Mikemikev]

It's really not relevant who else populates this thread, you're the subject so I was focusing on you.

If you would care to debate a topic of your choice, that would be fine. You can do so here or via PM, whichever is easier.

I wouldn't debate here because it's full of assholes. How about a neutral debate forum? Will respond after dinner.

 

[FataBataRang]

I wouldn't debate here because it's full of assholes. How about a neutral debate forum? Will respond after dinner.