Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[Mikemikev]

Oddly enough, yes.



Also, this is hilarious:

Once again you falsely represent the law.

Your wish is my command, Mike:

That's not a credible threat.

 

[sbm1990]

*locked away

Yeah, and if you get caught downloading porn of underaged girls, that's what will happen to you.

 

[Florence]

Once again you falsely represent the law.

"A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if—

(a)he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred
(b)having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby."

 

[Mikemikev]

Yeah, and if you get caught downloading porn of underaged girls, that's what will happen to you.

You too! But we're dealing with what actually happened, including defamation carrying a prison sentence.

 

[Curt Sibling]

Why would I be worried? You haven't referenced a single thing I could be prosecuted for.

I think threatening someone's kid with murder and declaring an intention for online harrassment might land you in hot water.

I am sure people here have saved all the evidence.

It would be best if you play nice, boyo.

you're trash that should be licked away.

What an illiterate mongoloid.

 

[Cato]

That's not a credible threat.

As opposed to your doxxing threats, your threats to get the UK authorities on our asses, your threats to humiliate us in debates, etc.

 

[Mikemikev]

"A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if—

(a)he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred
(b)having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby."

I don't intend to stir up hatred. I criticise groups appropriately with a view towards fixing their behavior. Try again!

As opposed to your doxxing threats, your threats to get the UK authorities on our asses, your threats to humiliate us in debates, etc.

It's not illegal to make those threats. Try again!

 

[Cato]

I don't intend to stir up hatred. I criticise groups appropriately with a view towards fixing their behavior. Try again!

LOL, "fixing their behavior" = "genocide and slavery," right?

Also, "behavior" instead of "behaviour?" What are you, an American?

 

[Curt Sibling]

I don't intend to stir up hatred. I criticise groups appropriately with a view towards fixing their behavior. Try again!

Denial is not just a river in Egypt.

A judge would probably disagree as he passes sentence.
You'd end up in some mental ward.

 

[Mikemikev]

I think threatening someone's kid with murder and declaring an intention for online harrassment might land you in hot water.

I am sure people here have saved all the evidence.

It would be best if you play nice, boyo.


What an illiterate mongoloid.

My Word. You're counter accusing me of "online harassment"? And your criminal defamation wouldn't excuse that as provoked?

 

[Florence]

I don't intend to stir up hatred. I criticise groups appropriately with a view towards fixing their behavior. Try again!

There's an element of cleverness. But the dishonesty and ethnocentrism are the primary factors. The average kike is less clever than the average White. The kikes who monopolise academia by cheating and nepotism are less clever than the cleverer Whites.

kike orchestrated White genocide.

 

[sbm1990]

My Word. You're counter accusing me of "online harassment"? And your criminal defamation wouldn't excuse that as provoked?

I bet you were planning on murdering Naomi had she have been Catparty.

 

[Mikemikev]

View attachment 223090

I don't see your point.

 

[Florence]

I don't see your point.

The point is that you're not criticizing, you're stating what you believe to be true.

 

[Begemot]

My Word. You're counter accusing me of "online harassment"? And your criminal defamation wouldn't excuse that as provoked?

After you 'lick' me away, I hope you realise you're complicit in your continual need to come here and bray and pout. You choose to be here.

Cato has a point, though. Why do you spell behaviour as behavior? Perhaps you're using spellcheck and it's Americanising your spelling?

 

[Curt Sibling]

My Word. You're counter accusing me of "online harassment"? And your criminal defamation wouldn't excuse that as provoked?

Says the guy who made death threats against a kid.

 

[Mikemikev]

After you 'lick' me away, I hope you realise you're complicit in your continual need to come here and bray and pout. You choose to be here.

Cato has a point, though. Why do you spell behaviour as behavior? Perhaps you're using spellcheck and it's Americanising your spelling?

Lol what? You think that if someone chooses to go somewhere that makes it ok to defame them?

Says the guy who made death threats against a kid.

Liar!

 

[Begemot]

Liar!

Liar!

 

[sbm1990]

Liar!

But these are threats that you have clearly made in this thread. Don't bullshit!

 

[Poor Choices]

You're a liar. Your behavior carries prison time in England.

Stop A-Logging the UK I'm sure they're not that bad.