Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[ChurchOfGodBear]

That's all I wanted to know.

So again, you are not actually interested in a debate, is that the conclusion I should draw?

 

[MistressCaridad]

I remember last time you set up all kinds of weird criteria to weasel out of it.

Says the guy who, like a tard, posted IP phishing links and set up all kinds of weird criteria to weasel out of actually debating.

No debate was actually set up, you just posted links to phishing sites and claimed you set something up. You refused to debate in a forum of my choice because it didn't match your grade school format.

EDIT: quoting @ChurchOfGodBear ’s post as citation

Mike, I’ve tried to engage you in thoughtful conversation before and upon my asking for deeper analysis you chimped out, called me a bitch and wouldn’t say anything more beyond your little parroted points. You’re not going to actually debate.

 

[Pedophile Michael Coombs]

So again, you are not actually interested in a debate, is that the conclusion I should draw?

I told you I just wondered whether you were ashamed of showing your face. Why would I want to talk to you?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I told you I just wondered whether you were ashamed of showing your face. Why would I want to talk to you?

Well, for starters, that's what a "debate" actually is: lots of talking.

 

[Pedophile Michael Coombs]

Well, for starters, that's what a "debate" actually is: lots of talking.

It usually also involves people who aren't ashamed to show their face.

 

[GethN7]

It usually also involves people who aren't ashamed to show their face.

Question, Micheal: What is the point of showing faces if we've seen yours and you still argue in bad faith either way?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

It usually also involves people who aren't ashamed to show their face.

Again, I am not the subject of the debate, so it's an irrelevant point. This is remarkably like your odd need to have a time limit on the debate: it's a criteria you're imposing that shows you really don't understand the concept of a debate at all.

 

[Pedophile Michael Coombs]

Again, I am not the subject of the debate, so it's an irrelevant point. This is remarkably like your odd need to have a time limit on the debate: it's a criteria you're imposing that shows you really don't understand the concept of a debate at all.

I didn't think I would be the "subject of the debate". I mean I understand that's how Null set up his abuse forum. You seem confused between how a sadistic abuse forum operates and how normal people operate. Normal people also have the common courtesy to show their face. Psychotic internet trolls not so much.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I didn't think I would be the "subject of the debate". I mean I understand that's how Null set up his abuse forum. You seem confused between how a sadistic abuse forum operates and how normal people operate.

As the person who has called for the debate (multiple times, I might add) you are free to decide what the subject would be. As I recall, you had great difficulty even doing that.

 

[MistressCaridad]

Again, I am not the subject of the debate, so it's an irrelevant point. This is remarkably like your odd need to have a time limit on the debate: it's a criteria you're imposing that shows you really don't understand the concept of a debate at all.

He’s banking on people being all NO I DON’T WANT TO SHOW MY FACE TO U and when someone calls his bluff he’s just going to piss his pants and hide again like a little bitch

He’s just like Danny, he can’t form an original thought or opinion. Unlike good old Danny, however, he doesn’t have the excuse of mixing alcohol, prescription drugs and Cletus’s bathtub meth to account for his limited mental capacity.

 

[Pedophile Michael Coombs]

As the person who has called for the debate (multiple times, I might add) you are free to decide what the subject would be. As I recall, you had great difficulty even doing that.

Well now you're contradicting yourself and not making any sense. As I told you I was only interested in whether you were ashamed of showing your face. And that question has been answered. Why would I waste my time talking to you?

 

[GethN7]

I didn't think I would be the "subject of the debate". I mean I understand that's how Null set up his abuse forum. You seem confused between how a sadistic abuse forum operates and how normal people operate. Normal people also have the common courtesy to show their face. Psychotic internet trolls not so much.

Let's cut the crap, shall we Micheal?

You want to see a picture of someone you are debating so you can have some form of dox on them. This has nothing to do with the probity of the other side, you simply want something to use to soil their reputation with later.

That is why you are not getting the real life photo of anyone who has not already put it out there, no one is stupid enough to give someone with your motives that information.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

He’s banking on people being all NO I DON’T WANT TO SHOW MY FACE TO U and when someone calls his bluff he’s just going to piss his pants and hide again like a little bitch

He’s just like Danny, he can’t form an original thought or opinion. Unlike good old Danny, however, he doesn’t have the excuse of mixing alcohol, prescription drugs and Cletus’s bathtub meth to account for his limited mental capacity.

Yep, Danny and Mike were such good friends.

I don't mind taking it slow with Mike. I know he's just going to wimp out each time.

Well now you're contradicting yourself and not making any sense. As I told you I was only interested in whether you were ashamed of showing your face. And that question has been answered. Why would I waste my time talking to you?

Case in point: Mike saying he doesn't want to talk to me, after literally asking for a debate. He thinks he's proving something, I guess. No one but him gives a shit what I look like, but it's his way out.

Interestingly, all of Mike's earlier debate forums were text-based, so his need for a face is very recent.

 

[Pedophile Michael Coombs]

Let's cut the crap, shall we Micheal?

You want to see a picture of someone you are debating so you can have some form of dox on them. This has nothing to do with the probity of the other side, you simply want something to use to soil their reputation with later.

That is why you are not getting the real life photo of anyone who has not already put it out there, no one is stupid enough to give someone with your motives that information.

Oh God it's the robot sperg. No I was just curious whether he had the nuts to show his face. That's all. You think this asshole is even worth my time doxing?

 

[GethN7]

Oh God it's the robot sperg. No I was just curious whether he had the nuts to show his face. That's all.

Micheal, let's be clear on something. You have more than once decided to avoid a debate with anything except on terms in your lopsided favor, and even when people have met you halfway, you ran from honoring your end.

Trust begins when both sides show it to the other side, and given your track record, it's not unreasonable to assume you will show none.

If you don't like hearing that, I'm sorry, but truth is often uncomfortable, and I hope you will consider it for future reference.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Oh God it's the robot sperg. No I was just curious whether he had the nuts to show his face. That's all. You think this asshole is even worth my time doxing?

A very odd thing to be curious about. Is this how you spend your day?

 

[MistressCaridad]

A very odd thing to be curious about. Is this how you spend your day?

I’m wondering about this myself. All of us are well out of the age range to suit his fantasies... so what does he want?

Okay, though, Mikey, I’ll post a picture for you to look at.

Spoiler: Can I get a hell yeah

 

[byuu]

That's all. You think this asshole is even worth my time doxing?

What are you doing with your time that's so valuable anyway?

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I’m wondering about this myself. All of us are well out of the age range to suit his fantasies... so what does he want?

Okay, though, Mikey, I’ll post a picture for you to look at.

Spoiler: Can I get a hell yeah

View attachment 765822

My guess is that Mike is wanting to feel smart, so he's acting like he has this brilliant plan to fool/embarrass/dox/whatever us. So he comes up with this comical plan, thinking he's always three steps ahead of us.

In reality, he's like a little kid who thinks he can stump people with a riddle everyone else heard decades ago. He doesn't realize we're all just humoring him.

 

[ProgKing of the North]

Here's my face, Mike! Can we debate, now?

Spoiler