He also bemoans how easily he made his enemies at the 1:50 mark.
"if somebody does wrong, and you pull them up on it, as likely as not, they will thereafter be waiting to get revenge...
if you tell a friend some home truths they don't want to hear, as likely as not, they will thereafter be waiting to get revenge...
if you tell someone in a Telegram group that their destructive behavior is damaging community morale, as likely as not, they will thereafter be waiting to get revenge"
BUT WAIT, he spends the second half of the video telling people that they must not pull up people who are doing wrong, or tell them home truths they don't want to hear, or tell them off for destructive behaviour! Because to do that is a sign of a problem within yourself you refuse to acknowledge, it's "unhealthy," a sign of "malice", "insecurity" and "self-delusion." Don't be the moral authority for the group, because:
"If someone is doing something illegal or immoral, it will either be dealt with by the law, or the person will pay in some other way."
Colin Weinstein, 2020
So who made him the moral authority who could reprimand others their behavior, but who seems himself as above the critique? Why, he did, himself. Because he sees himself as superior to everyone else. Beyond good and evil. And in true diabolical style, he told everyone that in 2014 (and thanks to PO, the internet historian for the ages, we have evidence of these streams.)
"A liar best knows the value of truth."
Colin Robertson, 2014, arguing why you need to have liars, homosexuals and other degenerates in "the movement."
Yes, liars indeed value truth. They value it greatly, because they know that honest people are easy marks. A high-trust society that values truth is easy pickings for the narcissist who knows how to create a convincing persona. But for those of us who have seen the act before, they have a harder time, because we won't get fooled again, and see the tricks for what they are.
