Culture Millennials destroyed the rules of written English – and created something better - It's 2018, it's time to type like a teenage Tumblr girl online.

https://archive.fo/NxCUx

The spelling and grammar rules do not apply on the Millennial Internet™.

That's because millennials have created a new rulebook for a variant of written English unique to social media. A rulebook which states that deliberately misspelled words and misused grammar can convey tone, nuance, humour, and even annoyance.

Dr Lauren Fonteyn, English Linguistics lecturer at University of Manchester, told Mashable "something exciting" is happening with the way that millennials write, and it goes far, far beyond our proclivity to use acronyms and "like."

Fonteyn says millennials are "breaking the constraints" of written English to "be as expressive as you can be in spoken language." This new variant of written English strives to convey what body language, and tone and volume of voice can achieve in spoken English.

Fonteyn says that on a superficial level, we can see millennials stripping anything unnecessary from their writing, like the removal of abbreviation markers in "dont," "cant," "im" and in acronyms like tf, ur, bc, idk, and lol. In a world where most of our conversations take place online, millennials are using a number of written devices to convey things that could typically only be communicated by cadence, volume, or even body language.

One such device is "atypical capitalisation," according to Fonteyn, a break from a rule prescribed by standard spelling, which states that capitalisation is "reserved for proper nouns, people, countries, brands, the first person pronoun, and the first word in a new sentence."

"What we see in millennial spelling is different, but not unruly," says Fonteyn. "Capitals are not necessarily used for people (we know who ed sheeran is, it’s Ed Sheeran), or initial words of a text or tweet."

upload_2018-4-4_23-33-9.png

Dr Ruth Page, senior lecturer in Applied Linguistics at Birmingham University, says that frequently the "personal pronoun ('I') is in the lower case ('i')" which is sometimes used to "play down the person's sense of self."

While we're abandoning capitals for things that typically always required them, we're using them to add emphasis or humour to written sentences. "Capitals ARE used, however, to make words stand out," says Fonteyn. "By capitalising something that is not typically capitalised, you can add subtle emphasis, or irony or mockery." Full capitals are used to denote strong emphasis, or "volume of laughter in lol vs. LOL," says Fonteyn.

upload_2018-4-4_23-33-32.png


Millennials' use—or rather, misuse—of punctuation is where things really start to get creative. Page says research shows how "non-standard use of punctuation can reflect ‘tone of voice’ or what linguists would call ‘paralinguistic’ meaning." She says that an example of this is using a period (a.k.a. a full stop) at the end of a sentence to "indicate that you are cross."

According to Fonteyn, the absence of a full stop at the end of a sentence is "neutral," but the addition of one adds the "sense of being pissed off," or that you're "done talking."

A two-dot ellipsis (..), in millennial English means "continue," or "please elaborate." And, a three-dot ellipsis denotes an "awkward or annoyed silence," or "are you serious?"

Using the comma-ellipsis to write ‘ok,,’ or ‘you sure,,,’ can convey "insecurity or uneasiness," according to Fonteyn. While a three-dot ellipsis might be employed to convey intense annoyance, the comma-ellipsis indicates a "different type of intensity," of annoyance or unsureness.

An utter absence of punctuation is most often used as a way of expressing sheer unadulterated excitement. "A complete lack of punctuation iconically mimics the way someone speaks when they are crazy excited about something," says Fonteyn. "In that case, you are adding excitement by taking away commas and full stops, which indicate pauses."

upload_2018-4-4_23-33-54.png


Attempting to bush the bounds of what written language can do in order to better express ourselves and our feelings is the chief use for these devices.

But, Dr Peredur Webb-Davies, senior lecturer in Welsh Linguistics at Bangor University, says it also has something to do with feeling part of a community. Webb-Davies says that internet users can "project an identity for themselves which is represented by the way they type their language." Crucially, "users who write in similar ways using a ‘code’ that might be mostly only intelligible to those in the know, can do this to feel part of a wider community."

For millennials who conduct so many of their conversations online, this creativity with written English allows us to express things that we would have previously only been conveyed through volume, cadence, tone, or body language. But, Fonteyn thinks it "goes beyond that as well," with things like the trademark symbol.

"When TM is added to a phrase, it ADDS something you can’t do in a regular conversation," says Fonteyn. "I don’t think this originates in speech, because I don’t think anyone actually says "the point TM."

upload_2018-4-4_23-34-10.png


"This emphatic method might actually originate in digital language: they’re not just indicating prosody from spoken language but they are adding a visual joke to it, TM in Hyperscript," Fonteyn adds.

What we're witnessing is the nascent beginnings of informal written English becoming even more expressive than spoken English.

Perhaps we should add "IRL conversations" to The Official List of Things Millennials Destroyed. LOL.
 
I'm more just side -eying the article's attempts to put some sort of psychological profile onto Tumblrspeak what with "a millennial will use a lowercase 'i' to convey a feeling of lesser sense of self!" when the actual reason for it is more likely along the lines of "aw fuck autocorrect didn't catch that, fuck it everyone will get the jist of it. "
 
It depends on the Slang and even then Accent plays a bigger part, my native accent is Scouse a Dialect of English that is considered it's own language for example "I was talking to our Kid" does not mean a child, it means close personal friend mostly (they can be related to you but it isn't always the case, often far from it) for example in the case of KF of "Our Kid"[....]

Is that the same reason why Scottish people type in their accents?
eyCPTql.png

26bff06e99609f8f181a81892909557a.png
 
Almost, and No at the same time.

For example I can translate that into scouse easily "Seen a a bird shouten att he kkidderto stick is kecks on, an purple akki is gona stelle ye cokk if youz dont" (gives Grammarly a heart attack if i try full pronouciation) however as I said there is kinds of English that we can understand the vernacular in even in text as it's mostly written how it is written.

For example, there is also pan lingual vernacular that applies to universal hobbies, for Example, say tonight I when fishing and I caught a Dab (Limanda limanda) a common fish in the UK and called my friend Jeff is Scotland and I said "Hey our kid I caught a massive Fatty" he'd understand that it was most likely a Dab and understand that I pronounce Flatty as Fatty and then if he asked "Eye ho bigg?" I would reply with "2 bag of sweet" and I'll get a reply back.

Because we all work from a certain basic background we are able to work out things.


Put simply were a nation that can go into any county in the UK, walk into a chippy and say
"Alright mate, split, baby's yed and a can a pop please"
And come out with a different order every time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ravenor
"Millennials destroyed the rules of written English – and created something better"

Has the meaning of "better" changed too?
From the writer of the article's perspective (remember, this is Mashable we're talking about), this actually is better. Millenials, and gen z to an even greater extent, believe that everything new is good and everything old is bad. These grammar and spelling rules are from centuries ago? They must be bad. These new tumblr-speak rules are from only a few years ago? They must be good. You see them lean on this argument a lot, especially when it comes to altering things like the first and second ammendments, that they "were from a different time and need to be updated for the modern era."
 
This entire article, but especially the writer, is not so much brain as earwax. 'Tis a mountain of mad flesh, a lump of foul deformity. I am heavily enjoying my Shakespeare Insults Coffee Mug and we will be keeping the current rules of English so I can continue to call people roast-meat for worms.
 
From the writer of the article's perspective (remember, this is Mashable we're talking about), this actually is better. Millenials, and gen z to an even greater extent, believe that everything new is good and everything old is bad. These grammar and spelling rules are from centuries ago? They must be bad. These new tumblr-speak rules are from only a few years ago? They must be good. You see them lean on this argument a lot, especially when it comes to altering things like the first and second ammendments, that they "were from a different time and need to be updated for the modern era."
As much as I agree, I feel like that attitude is more of a young person thing than a generational thing, at least from personal experience.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Trilby
As much as I agree, I feel like that attitude is more of a young person thing than a generational thing, at least from personal experience.
I half agree, half disagree. On the one hand, you're right that this attitude is more often associated with young people. On the other hand, the older millenials are in their mid-30's now, aren't they? You'd think they'd grow up by now.
:powerlevel:I could be categorized as either a millenial or gen z depending on where you draw the line. Personally, I hate the degeneration of the english language that's gone on at the hands of my peers. A lot of them can barely spell. Then again, I post here, so I'm probably an outlier/terminally :autistic:.
 
Yes, the two periods isn't so cut and dried as they say. I know people who use it and many other things for rather particular purposes and I don't think I've ever seen anyone try to define that one.

The main problem I have with this whole thing is that none of this shit is really new, even if it wasn't all in the same context/medium. Might even have to point to e e cmmngs for an example of some of these. Granted, the internet gives it a better opportunity to spread and be studied. But I don't know why muh millennials want to think they're going around revolutionizing everything. They're like, ooh, we're breaking free of the chains of standard grammar, and I'm like, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLgJ3joF0h0

The one that stood out to me was the Emphasis Capitals -- Didn't A. A. Milne do it? Of course, capitalizing important things is plenty old. I remember Milne achieving much the same tone with it that they use it for today.

Spamming punctuation for effect is at least as old as the typewriter.

I get they're doing some new stuff with it, it just seems like they think they're pioneers in pushing this envelope but it's already in shreds.

That said, the Angry Period they mentioned is a pretty interesting little topic:

https://newrepublic.com/article/115726/period-our-simplest-punctuation-mark-has-become-sign-anger

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...sing-periods-period-2/?utm_term=.b062f790ee24

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/10/...s-called-millennials-arent-using-it.html?_r=0
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ineedahero
Wayup.
(Hello)

Wor t'hell this article about?
(What's this article about?)

Sayms like a rayt boncha crap t'may.
(Seems like nonsense to excuse lazy typing)

Annyroad, yew lot wonna brew?
(Anyway, anyone fancy a cup of tea?)

Its rather obvious this is some nonsence written by someone that's never really encountered the concept of proper local dialects and accents before (so basically an american that likely freaks out whenever they go to Minnesota or Pittsburgh where soda is called pop). There's very little different between "millenial" english or normal ones except it's incredibly stupid and if you're dumb enough to use it you're getting turned down flat for essays and job applications. Some can write in accents and not do too badly. Scottish Twitter is a good example of this.

If I wrote fully in Pillockshire dialect you'd actually need to go consult a Pillockshire Dialect Dictionary (Two such books have been published in the past, no, really).

Now back in t'dee (the day) Rural East Pillockshire had a big n fancy National Coal Board facility established where rayt fancy blokes come from over water. (Lots of new people moved in from outside the county, as Pillockshire has many rivers surrounding it, previously said rivers were the county border and so anyone outside said county is considered from over said water).

They were given (with a very firm tongue pushed into the cheek) a "translation sheet" which translated common vernacular phrases, ones which I understand perfectly well, into normal english.

Now, thankfully I speak generally in received pronunciation english most of the time, but some elements of local dialect can't be escaped from. (Days are Dee's, busses are Buzzes etc.)

I've also become an accent whore over the years due to being exposed to so many different accents, dialects etc.

So, say, I went and spent a weekend or so up in @Ravenor 's patch and pretty much exclusively spoke with him or his friends. Probably by the end of the weekend I'd have a slight scouser accent as if I'd been living in Wirral most of my life.

A few years back I worked in Stoke On Trent for a looooooong time and basically spoke like a Stokie. Which is a horrible fusion of Brummie and Scouser and sets most people's teeth on edge hearing said accent.

Basically what my rambling post is saying. This millenial english shit is yet more crap written by some confused fuck born in the 70s who's desperately trying to be "hip wid dem kids, yo." when the reality is it's just autocorrect and lazy fucking typing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: totse and Ravenor
I still think an "Academie Anglaise" might be a useful regulatory body for English language. All we have now is the annual pronouncements of the Oxford Dictionary and Merriam-Webster Dictionary, and I guess maybe the style guidelines from MLA or whatever that thing is called. Of course the speculative regulatory body need not be as authoritative and draconian as the Academie Francaise or the French language police in Quebec (i forget what it's called) where they can slap you with fines for misusing the language in certain situations.
 
I fucking despise the words for generations and anyone who uses them is automatically worse than the retards who use tumblrspeak. Literally no one that doesn't frequently use tumblr or Twitter types like that. It's not a generational thing, it's just the consequences of giving retards internet access. And teenagers being teenagers and copying the style so that they can be one of the cool kids.
I think it's retarded and annoying, too, especially the overuse of question marks, but this "REEEEEEE MILLENNIALS" thing needs to fucking stop.
 
I fucking despise the words for generations and anyone who uses them is automatically worse than the exceptional individuals who use tumblrspeak. Literally no one that doesn't frequently use tumblr or Twitter types like that. It's not a generational thing, it's just the consequences of giving exceptional individuals internet access. And teenagers being teenagers and copying the style so that they can be one of the cool kids.
I think it's exceptional and annoying, too, especially the overuse of question marks, but this "REEEEEEE MILLENNIALS" thing needs to fucking stop.
Typical millennial.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Trilby
i stopped reading at the word millennials
any news story with that word is either left-wing UGU WE SO GOOD DOWN WITH CAPITALISM or some shit
or right-wing UGU ME BABYBOOMER SO GOOD KIDS DEZEDAYS DONT BUY CAVIAR
 
Back