- Joined
- Jun 10, 2021
It won't stop them from filing, but any judge who knows how to read will see that and kick that case right into the bin, they can keep suing and suing but that doesn't mean they won't keep losing.
Miriam Yaniv vs Strata (again) June 2021 - Sequel to the 2019 lolsuit. Written by Jonathan.
- Thread starter JY's Tampon
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2019
Again, this is the kind of thing you do when you are too stupid to realize that not only are you not, in fact, the smartest dude in every room but are, in fact, pretty damned dumb and flailing, actually,
$35,000 is the maximum in BC small claims.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
To be publicly branded, by a court, as a lying racist con artist would be enough for anyone to disappear and take stock but here he is still trying for those $$$.
---
Just read this article about a 27 year old self-made billionaire... "In just two years, Johnny Boufarhat has turned his online conference-hosting platform, Hopin, into a company valued at over £4bn." https://www.bbc.com/news/business-57517669 and immediately thought of jonny and his IT storage problems.
Not only has Boufarhat 500+ employees but he has no office and he flits between rental properties.
So it begs the question why does jonathan gill yaniv need extra storage space in another flat which is so small the lodger has to sleep on a sofa? I know he's lying through his backside but I'm so hoping someone asks what he has in storage, for his defunct IT business, that his own strata storage facility,and that of his mother, can't accomodate? <shrugs>
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2021
I'm confused. Here in the States you can go to jail if you try to present yourself as a lolyer when you're not. I know paralegal students are warned explicitly about this during their classes; they can walk clients through paperwork but they have to be careful not to do anything that could be interpreted as "giving legal advice" otherwise they could get into serious trouble.
I know in Canada paralegals can actually do things like write wills and appear in courts or something, at least I think it's Canada. In any case, some places do things differently wrt people who aren't lolyers, and of course anyone can represent themselves.
Small claims court is, of course, designed so people don't need lawyers and all that (lol fivever, you always need a lawyer), but I'm pretty sure that down here I couldn't represent someone else in small claims without getting in serious trouble. But here it just looks like the Strata complained but is there any real penalty for this?
I know in Canada paralegals can actually do things like write wills and appear in courts or something, at least I think it's Canada. In any case, some places do things differently wrt people who aren't lolyers, and of course anyone can represent themselves.
Small claims court is, of course, designed so people don't need lawyers and all that (lol fivever, you always need a lawyer), but I'm pretty sure that down here I couldn't represent someone else in small claims without getting in serious trouble. But here it just looks like the Strata complained but is there any real penalty for this?
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2021
What is even weirder is how didn't they even ask for any documentation, or any credentials (like Canadian Bar Association Membership), I don't really see this person being any persuasive to begin with so how the fuck did they even let them file the damn suit?
Also, straight from the Canadian Bar Association (https://www.cba-alberta.org/Publica...-Fall-2015-Issue/Unauthorized-Practice-of-Law):
Complaints of Unauthorized Practice are reviewed and investigated by the Law Society. When a report is received, and it is clear that Unauthorized Practice has taken place within the meaning of section 106(1) of the Act and that an exception does not apply, the first step is to seek voluntary compliance by the subject of the complaint. If voluntary compliance is not forthcoming, the Act contemplates two additional remedies: the first is for the Law Society to apply for an injunction in the Court of Queen’s Bench;17 the second is to prosecute the non-lawyer in the Provincial Court.18 Prosecutions are conducted by the Ministry of Justice and Attorney General (the “Ministry”) or by designated counsel of the Law Society as agents of the Crown pursuant to Agency Agreements with the Ministry. The Act contemplates penalties of escalating fines or imprisonment for a term of up to six months for Unauthorized Practice.
So yeah, it's also illegal in Canada.
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2021
If filing suits works anything similar up there as it does down here then they wouldn't ask for credentials at the court house. The way it works here is anyone can file anything with the courts. The clerks don't check anything beyond making sure the heading is largely correct. They stamp it with their machines to indicate time/date it was filed, give it a case number, and take your money if it's the initial pleading in the lolsuit. If not, that part is skipped.
They don't even check to make sure the papers are signed. It's not the clerks job to make sure the paperwork is correct. In fancy court that's the job of the lawyer who really relies on his paralegal. In theory the lawyer reads what his paralegal writes up, but in practice a lot of lawyers just sign their name and send the paralegal to the court house (or put the stuff in the mail). If the lawyer fucks it up he's the one who gets yelled at by the judge, not the clerk.
Here the lawyers do put the bar license number in their signature portion of the pleading. I don't know if that's unique to my state or if every state does that.
I can't imagine Canada differs too much at the court house clerk level. Especially not for small claims.
They don't even check to make sure the papers are signed. It's not the clerks job to make sure the paperwork is correct. In fancy court that's the job of the lawyer who really relies on his paralegal. In theory the lawyer reads what his paralegal writes up, but in practice a lot of lawyers just sign their name and send the paralegal to the court house (or put the stuff in the mail). If the lawyer fucks it up he's the one who gets yelled at by the judge, not the clerk.
Here the lawyers do put the bar license number in their signature portion of the pleading. I don't know if that's unique to my state or if every state does that.
I can't imagine Canada differs too much at the court house clerk level. Especially not for small claims.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
One of the more common exceptions to this sort of thing is generally an adult child acting in aid of an elderly parent or relative in matters before small local judicial bodies such as small claims court that would not typically require the services of an attorney to ressolve. Local fenceline squabbles with the neighbors and such. But the key element is generally the son or daughter is acting to help peacefully and clearly ressolve the matter. Judges like that. Yaniv is the other thing. Yaniv complicates simple and stupid things.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
"In related news, the strata that Miriam sued with legal advocate Jessica Yaniv Simpson, and then re-filed against jointly, has filed an amended reply to them. It basically says all the same things and adds Jon’s name." https://meowmix.org/miriam-yaniv-and-ilana-altman-legal-update/
jonny needs to jiggle his copy and paste crap more carefully in the future.
jonny needs to jiggle his copy and paste crap more carefully in the future.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
In reading this I'm wondering How the Fuck is Yaniv even a party to this? Even under his own twisted logic. It's clear his claims of renting office space at Mom's are a scam because he suddenly grew concerned about "unlicensed practice of law". But as regards his mothers apartment Johnny has no relationship with the Strata. The Strata has no obligations to him. He is literally a non entity in this dispute. Yet it is he and he alone that is the only moving party in his simultaneous suit before the BCHRT.
A question for @LangleyResident are there Strata Rules governing operating a business from your Strata Apartment? I'm pretty sure almost any strata or condo rules severely limit the types of business that can be conducted from the property. And subletting your unit as office space would almost certainly be on the do not do list. I can't wait to see the fines Miriam gets hammered with the moment the Judge tosses this case. (which will be at the first hearing).
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2021
Jon's case against his own strata isn't dismissed. Yet. It's really unclear. There was a hearing on Friday but nothing came from it.
Todays hearing was about the joint application by Jon and mommy dearest against miriams strata.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
Judge LGBTQ Cohen says no. Another "neo-Nazi", mother threatening to exhume bodies yet?
Bye, bye $30,236.00.
Credit where credit is due eh.
Bye, bye $30,236.00.
Credit where credit is due eh.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
I wonder if the Strata can assess a fine against Miriam and her unit equal to the costs of representation in a meritless action that the community as a whole was forced to lay out for? I mean that is normal with HOA's is it not? At a certain point they will hire somebody to clean up your shit, than dump the bill on you, and you have no way of fighting it.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
miriam included. The irony of her having to $ contribute to lawyer's fees that fought her claim. Too delicious for words.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
I have to wonder if Johnny or Mommy Dearest have noted how accomodating the Strata lawyer has been in directing them to the BCHRT? Like it is real obvious he knows that dance, has done in 100 times and he has no question of the outcome. Or rather he knows its a bullshit body and any decision of it can and Will be escalated to the higher (real) court where he will curbstomp the grifters and get fees asigned. You can almost see him salivating.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
Expert Analysis: Miriam Yaniv vs. Her Strata | MeowMix
MeowMix's legal expert friend has weighed in on Miriam Yaniv's lawsuit against her strata - the one where Jessica Yaniv Simpson is acting as her "public
meowmix.org
miriam has already lost $236.00 (filing/service fees), it seems the sky's the limit with these hillbillies.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2021
Didn't the HRT tell Yaniv to lay off until he'd cleared his outstanding judgements? I assumed that's why he wasn't going to the HRT.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2019
Maybe Judge Cohen reads this thread.
Maybe Judge Cohen is a member here.
Maybe Judge Cohen is Langley Resident.
Maybe Judge Cohen is a member here.
Maybe Judge Cohen is Langley Resident.