Culture MIT's Drop in Black Students Shows Fallout From Top Court Ruling - The enrollment numbers give an early indication of how US colleges are grappling with a Supreme Court decision that banned race as a factor in admissions.

1724272488580.png

The share of Black students in the incoming class at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology plummeted after the Supreme Court effectively banned considering race as a factor in undergraduate admissions last year.

The university said Wednesday the class of 2028 is 5% Black, down from an average of 13% in recent years. The share of Hispanic students in the class is 11%, down from 15%, MIT said.

Meanwhile, Asian Americans will make up 47% of MIT's incoming class, up from 41%. Students for Fair Admissions, the group that brought the Supreme Court case against Harvard and the University of North Carolina that led to the ruling against affirmative action, had argued that the schools penalized Asian Americans during the admissions process.

MIT’s numbers indicate how last year's Supreme Court ruling is posing a challenge for universities to meet their diversity goals. Considering race in admissions has long been controversial. Schools have argued that it helps them build diverse student bodies, while detractors contend the policies unfairly discriminated against Asian and White students. A Pew Research Center survey published last June showed half of adults say race and ethnicity should not be a factor in admissions decisions at selective colleges, while one-third approved.

In recent years, around 25% of enrolling undergraduate students at MIT have identified as Black, Hispanic, and/or Native American and Pacific Islander. For the incoming class of 2028, that number is about 16%. The percentage of White students was little changed at 37%.

The Supreme Court’s decision sent shockwaves through the world of higher education, forcing administrators to plot new strategies to meet diversity goals. Stu Schmill, MIT’s dean of admissions, said in a blog post that the school had expanded recruitment efforts and financial aid initiatives in a bid to “improve access to students from all backgrounds.”

“If MIT cannot find a way to continue to draw on the full range of human talent and experience in the future, it may threaten the qualitative strength of the MIT education, both by a relative reduction in the educational benefits of diversity and by making our community less attractive to the best students from all backgrounds,” Schmill said.

Corporate Backlash​

While the court’s decision applied to college admissions, the backlash against affirmative action has spread to corporate America, with a series of lawsuits and employment complaints putting diversity, equity and inclusion policies under the microscope too.

Over the past year or so, business leaders across corporate America have become increasingly cautious about promoting their DEI initiatives publicly, some striking references to terms such as “anti-racist,” “unconscious bias” and “mandatory allyship” from regulatory filings.

The changes were made as conservative groups mounted legal attacks and prominent businesspeople from Bill Ackman to Elon Musk added to an intensifying backlash against DEI policies. Even so, US companies say they remain committed to workforce diversity, and a majority of Americans continue to support DEI programs, with a Washington Post-Ipsos poll in April finding 61% of adults think DEI programs in the workplace are “a good thing.”

It’s also clear that MIT thinks it has work to do as it tries to meet diversity goals.

“Now that the class of 2028 has enrolled, the impact is clear, and it is concerning,” Sally Kornbluth, the school’s president, said in a statement.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...n-black-student-enrollment-for-incoming-class (Archive)
 
It’s kind of weird that it went down

black people are 13% of the population. So like 45 million of them. Even if only .1% were MIT material, that’s still plenty of them.
or are blacks in such a bad state not even 1 out of 1000 are MIT material and without the scales tipping the attendance drops.

The data doesn't show anything. In principle the racial composition of the admitted students could be exactly the same as before, but without the incentive to make up a racial background to get admitted.
 
It looks like a substantial number of students stopped pretending to be mixed race for easier admission.

Asian admission went up 6% while all other minority admissions dropped by 14% total. White admission dropped by 1%.
Absolutely this. People used to pretend to identify as some sort of mixed race in order to advance their chances of admission, and now that it doesn't matter anymore, they've stopped.
 
"The return to meritocracy in higher education admissions disadvantages blacks".

I'm surprised that they even reported the results instead of just crying about loss of their racist admission standards and dropping the story.
 
oof dropped by more than half, being black at a prestigious university must fuel the most insane kind of imposter syndrome
It did during the affirmative action days, but as I'm looking to go back to school my feelings of imposter syndrome have decreased. During affirmation action I got vibes that less things were expected of me. Now that I know FOR SURE that I earned my spot not because of the color of my skin but because of my skills it feels like I deserve to be at a prestigious university. We'll see how the professors treat me though.
 
It’s kind of weird that it went down

black people are 13% of the population. So like 45 million of them. Even if only .1% were MIT material, that’s still plenty of them.
or are blacks in such a bad state not even 1 out of 1000 are MIT material and without the scales tipping the attendance drops.
Talented, intelligent blacks are spread out among prestigious colleges, and enough black Americans are not nearly college tier (never mind Ivy League) that you're never getting a 13 percent prevalence at a prestigious school without extremely hardcore affirmative action. For MIT to get to that percentage, there had to be an anvil on that scale.
 
Oh no, we might have smarter engineers.
Suggest the number that means the most is the percentage of students admitted who actually get the bachelor's degree within four years. To me, that's the school's success rate.
I was thinking the same thing. Every university with some combination of affirmative action or programs to admit underprivileged minorities inevitably has a good number of those students wash out. Whether they couldn't handle college level education, didn't make academics a priority, or ignored the advice of their counselors tasked with seeing them succeed, they flunk out.

I'm not sure if the graduation rate metric measures progress over 4, 5, or 6 years, but I'd argue schools will see more success if the students they admit of any background earn their degrees within that time period or - if nothing else - leave/transfer while in good academic standing. Quality, not quantity, should be emphasized; too many universities, however, care more about the latter.
 
“If MIT cannot find a way to continue to draw on the full range of human talent and experience in the future, it may threaten the qualitative strength of the MIT education, both by a relative reduction in the educational benefits of diversity and by making our community less attractive to the best students from all backgrounds,” Schmill said.
1FD3CD3B-74CC-46DD-8E89-08FB72F3C0A3.jpeg
Every single time.
 
At the Defense Language Institute, now many years ago, we had no control over the makeup of the student body. Students came at the orders of their respective services. The better a prospective student did on the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB), the more difficult the language they were assigned to learn.

The most difficult languages taught at DLI are Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, and Korean. Pashto was added many years after I left. First served as an associate dean of an Arabic-language school. Had graduated from the Korean course twenty years before that. Saw very few minority students in the school. Then became associate dean of a school teaching the Romance languages (Spanish/French/Portuguese), German, Czech, and Polish. The latter two languages had just a few students each. Saw many minority students studying Spanish; this was considered an easy language. Last school I was associate dean of before retiring taught Russian and Persian-Farsi. Again, not many minority students.

At that time attrition was a big thing with the command at DLI. Weak students got a tremendous amount of help, not just during the course, but even before the course started, while they were waiting for a class to start. Even at that, there was still attrition. Having actually done the linguist job in the field while enlisted, then later commanding linguists as an officer, believed less help needed to be provided. If someone needed their hand held a lot to get through the course, that didn't augur well for success in the field. Didn't say anything since nothing would change. When I went through the Korean course fifty years ago now, 41 of us started. 23 of us graduated. Some were recycled into other classes, some were sent to other units to do other jobs, and perhaps a few got out of the service altogether.

That's why I key on graduation stats vice entrance stats.
 
oof dropped by more than half, being black at a prestigious university must fuel the most insane kind of imposter syndrome
That's why they cope and call everything that ISN'T a HBCU a "PWI" or Pretty White institution.

Meanwhile in the real world Asians and Latinos are probably outnumbering whites at a good % of Universities.

Too bad dumbasses like Godfrey the asshurt black nationalist comedian can't see that and continue it bitch and moan about the Whypipo in university and a lack of Black brothers and sistas
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vecr
> Asians climb up
> "iT'S bEnEfFiTtInG wHiTeY!1!"

Niggers, you aren't even the worst off. Coconut niggers went extinct. :story:
 
Back