Moleman demands we all go away ... again

[José Mourinho]

They have created sick bastardizations of me and my work and then claimed theirs to be the originals and that I stole from them. That is false incrimination.

They have also blackmailed me, "demanding" that I confront them on their turf and threatening to hack me, spread lies to others who know me, etc.

Come to think of it, elaborate about these LIES they're spreading.

And perhaps you should post in the brony and furry threads. Like that we can get some respect and understanding of you and we might remove this thread if we want to, like you wanted.

 

[c-no]

They have created sick bastardizations of me and my work and then claimed theirs to be the originals and that I stole from them. That is false incrimination.

They have also blackmailed me, "demanding" that I confront them on their turf and threatening to hack me, spread lies to others who know me, etc.

Do you have proof that they stole from you? Their "rip-offs" from what I see seem to be more in line as pardoy.

For the record folks, try to keep it somewhat civil in here.

I'm not being uncivil am I? If so then I will refrain and let others post to Moleman9000.

 

[x.eight.six.systems]

Willow, Enig, etc. HAVE done such things and worse.

Because the only example that I've got record of is the 2 occasions where Space Pirate called your land-line.

 

[Dork Of Ages]

Incorrect; Willow Giovanna, Enig, Whin and some others ARE cyberbullying me.

Have you ever wondered why do they cyberbully you?

 

[Moleman9000]

Have you ever wondered why do they cyberbully you?

Because they are cruel and hateful people who care nothing about the feelings and rights of others.

 

[Dork Of Ages]

Because they are cruel and hateful people who care nothing about the feelings and rights of others.

Or, maybe, if you decide to tune in to reality, they "cyberbully" you because you make yourself a target to be cyberbullied?

And also, there are many examples of you that can be considered hateful and cruel.

 

[Moleman9000]

Do you have proof that they stole from you? Their "rip-offs" from what I see seem to be more in line as pardoy.

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Molem...ginal-Setting-Canon-and-Lore-Internet-1088799

 

[c-no]

Because they are cruel and hateful people who care nothing about the feelings and rights of others.

I may as well ask this, do you ever think that the reason why this thread exist is due to your behavior? Your behavior can be one of the reasons why we have this thread about you.

 

[Varis]

Because they are cruel and hateful people who care nothing about the feelings and rights of others.

Why aren't they bullying anyone else then?

 

[UnwiseKhan]

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Molem...ginal-Setting-Canon-and-Lore-Internet-1088799

That seems to support the theory that you stole from them. It's not really helping your case.

 

[Moleman9000]

Or, maybe, if you decide to tune in to reality, they "cyberbully" you because you make yourself a target to be cyberbullied?

And also, there are many examples of you that can be considered hateful and cruel.

I don't go after specific people across multiple sites over long periods of time.

 

[c-no]

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Molem...ginal-Setting-Canon-and-Lore-Internet-1088799

How can you be sure this is the work of Enig and Willow? Don't you think this could be the work of a ween?

I don't go after specific people across multiple sites over long periods of time.

You make yourself a target within the internet through your behavior, through your actions. If you didn't want such things, you could either of stayed off the internet until the heat died away or just simply ignore those you see as "cyber-bullies".

 

[Moleman9000]

That seems to support the theory that you stole from them. It's not really helping your case.

It's their lies.

 

[Seattle Trip to Neverfree]

They have created sick bastardizations of me and my work and then claimed theirs to be the originals and that I stole from them. That is false incrimination.

You have every right to air out your real life drama on the internet and stir up shit wherever you go online, but if you are publicly mocked for putting your information ON A PUBLIC FORUM WHERE EVERYONE CAN SEE AND COMMENT ON IT, then you have no right to bitch about being made fun of, or "cyberbullied" as you put it.

This isn't rocket science, Gave. This is common sense.

 

[Dork Of Ages]

I don't go after specific people across multiple sites over long periods of time.

Aren't you basically doing that by posting here?
It's sure a good way to get "cyberbullied"

And you seem to have forgotten that there are many words and actions that you have said and made that can be considered bullying.

 

[José Mourinho]

Moleman, elaborate why you're worried about you getting parodied/plagarised considering that you haven't made your Nava-verse as a full-blown franchise yet.

And plus, you haven't updated it for more than 4 months.

 

[UnwiseKhan]

It's their lies.

Unless you have proof that they're lying, saying these kinds of things could get you into legal trouble. Once you have proof, go to town, but until then it's probably not a good idea.

 

[x.eight.six.systems]

They have created sick bastardizations of me and my work and then claimed theirs to be the originals and that I stole from them. That is false incrimination.

They have also blackmailed me, "demanding" that I confront them on their turf and threatening to hack me, spread lies to others who know me, etc.

These sick bastardizations sic. are defined as criticism and comment and are protected under.
17 U.S. Code § 107 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

 

[Moleman9000]

And plus, you haven't updated it for more than 4 months.[/QUOTE]

Unless you have proof that they're lying, saying these kinds of things could get you into legal trouble. Once you have proof, go to town, but until then it's probably not a good idea.

It's blatantly obvious.

These sick bastardizations sic. are defined as criticism and comment and are protected under.
17 U.S. Code § 107 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

It's not fair use, though. It's blatantly unfair and is accompanied by active vandalism, blackmail, slander and hateful sentiment.

 

[José Mourinho]

http://navaverse.wikia.com/wiki/The_Pungbler_Games

Considering you consistently talk about you getting parodied/vandalised/stolen/plagarised etc., how about this page? Is it considered under parody or stealing of The Hunger Games?

The title and cover design are a blatantly obvious parody of The Hunger Games. The book itself was made up out of boredom, simply as a joke.