Science More Marriages End When Wives Get Sick Than When Husbands Do

Key points​

  • Research published in February investigated the vow to stand by a marriage in times of sickness.
  • Marriages are about seven times more likely to end when the wife becomes ill than when the husband does.
  • Most marriages do not end in divorce after a spouse becomes ill, even when the wife is the patient.
People who love being single and want to stay single, such as the single at heart, are often taunted with the question, “But who will be there for you in later life? What if you get sick?” The assumption seems to be that married people have nothing to worry about. After all, they made the vow to be there for each other “in sickness and in health.”

Research just published in February (2025) in the Journal of Marriage and Family shows that the vow to stand by a marriage in times of sickness is not so sturdy when it is the wife in a heterosexual couple who becomes ill.
The Italian social scientists Daniele Vignoli, Giammarco Alderotti, and Cecilia Tomassini, in an 18-year study, tracked more than 25,000 heterosexual couples, ages 50 and older, from 27 European nations. The participants were surveyed repeatedly and asked each time about their health, depression, whether they had limitations on what they could do in everyday life without help, and whether they were still together. The findings were reported in “Partners’ health and silver splits in Europe: A gendered pattern?

Vignoli and his colleagues looked separately at the couples who were between the ages of 50 and 64 and the couples in which at least one partner was 65 and older. Their results were stronger for the younger couples.

Couples between the ages of 50 and 64​

For the 50- to 64-year-olds, when the wife was in poor health but the husband wasn’t, their marriage was more likely to end than when both were in good health. When the husband was in poor health but the wife wasn’t, they were no more likely to split than when both were in good health.

The same pattern emerged for everyday limitations. When the wife was severely limited in her ability to perform the tasks of everyday life but her husband wasn’t, the couple was more likely to divorce than when neither experienced severe limitations. Again, if the situation reversed and it was the husband who had severe limitations, the marriage was no more likely to end than if neither partner had severe limitations.

When a wife was depressed but her husband wasn’t, the marriage was more likely to end than if neither partner was depressed. But a marriage was at least as likely to end when the husband was depressed and the wife wasn’t.

Couples in which at least one partner was 65 or older​

For the older couples, depression mattered more than physical health or activity limitations. For depression, the gendered pattern emerged: If the wife was depressed but the husband wasn’t, the marriage was more likely to end than if neither was depressed. But if the husband was depressed and the wife wasn’t, the couple was no more likely to divorce.

Why is a marriage more likely to end when a wife gets sick than when a husband does?​

The researchers did not test any explanations for their findings, and they discuss them only briefly. They suggest that it is typically the wife who has the role of the caregiver and that it is more stressful for the couple when the wife is ill than when the husband is. They also note that women are often more financially dependent and economically vulnerable; those challenges could pose barriers to the wives who might want to exit a marriage.

I'd add that men may be more likely to go into a marriage expecting to be cared for. When the tables are turned and they are the ones who need to do the intensive caring, some will leave rather than step up.

Other important considerations​

This was not the first study to show that a heterosexual marriage is more likely to end when a wife becomes seriously ill than when a husband does. In a study of married people diagnosed with a brain tumor or multiple sclerosis, the partner was more likely to be “abandoned” (in the authors’ words) when it was the wife who was ill. In those cases, 21 percent of the marriages ended. When it was the husband who became seriously ill, just 3 percent of the couples divorced.
That’s a big difference—marriages are about seven times more likely to end when the wife becomes seriously ill than when the husband does. But those numbers also show that most marriages do not end in divorce after a spouse becomes ill. Even when the wife is the patient, only about 1 in 5 marriages end in the next couple of years.
 
Maybe someone with more experience in reading these things than me can have a look but the numbers look infinitesimal to me.,
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Town Drunk
CTRL + F, Length of relationship, 0 results. If they couldn't be bothered to collect such information imagine what other information they didn't bother collecting. A theme amongst these studies is that if the relationship is new (1-2y and under) regardless on who gets the cancer the relationship is over but if they've been in a relationship for longer then they stay together.
 
CTRL + F, Length of relationship, 0 results. If they couldn't be bothered to collect such information
They did, "union duration" is a control variable, see table 1 of descriptive statistics. In the age 50-64 group of the sample, 80% fall in the 20 year union and longer, that figure rises to 88% for the older group.
 
Sure, but why do married men tend to die at an earlier age than married women?
because they want to, of course!
Married men live longer than unmarried dont they? The effect is attributed to ‘good nagging.’ Which is ‘honey I’ve told you a million times go get that dodgy mole looked at/you really need to go and see the doc about that cough..’
 
I think I have an idea as to why this is.

I saw a program on PBS that was all about a woman who had very bad cancer, or something very serious. It was a documentary about her and how her family members dropped almost everything in their lives to take care of her in the home.

The symptoms of the cancer were obviously very unbearable and extreme. She was seemingly suffering all the time.

When her husband was in the room with her without her kids, she gave him some of the worst verbal abuse I've ever heard in my entire life. It's like she hated him deeply for no reason at all. In

She would turn to the camera crew and tell them to look at how pathetic he looks. How fat he is. He's so awful. Blah blah blah. I think I actually blocked out most of what she said because I was so disturbed by it.

In fact, I've never seen that level of hate from anyone toward anything or anyone else. It was truly pure contempt. Absolutely nasty and disgusting.

I like to think that I'm a loyal person and that I would stick by my spouse no matter what. However, I know I couldn't if I was getting the level of treatment the husband got in this documentary.

If her behavior is at all indicative of some larger pattern of behavior from women who have advance or terminal illnesses, then I can fully see why this pattern exists.
 
If her behavior is at all indicative of some larger pattern of behavior from women who have advance or terminal illnesses, then I can fully see why this pattern exists.
That happens with any illness, men or women to be fair. People who are in incredible pain, or suffering from some fucked up brain shit, aren't going to be nice to you. They're going to lash out. I've been threatened with a knife, had my arms ripped and bleeding. I knew a woman who was called horrible, nasty things and punched in an eye that she just had surgery for.
These sort of things, you got to suck this sort of thing up, it's a part of the role of caretaking.
 
That happens with any illness, men or women to be fair. People who are in incredible pain, or suffering from some fucked up brain shit, aren't going to be nice to you. They're going to lash out. I've been threatened with a knife, had my arms ripped and bleeding. I knew a woman who was called horrible, nasty things and punched in an eye that she just had surgery for.
These sort of things, you got to suck this sort of thing up, it's a part of the role of caretaking.
Sure, I bet it's common and we all know men are awful too, and can be violent.

However, we've all heard, "Hell has no fury like a woman scorned." If it's a common psychological pattern for these women to subconsciously blame their husband and develop hate and contempt for him, then I could see why it's 3% when men are sick and 21% when women are sick.
 
If her behavior is at all indicative of some larger pattern of behavior from women who have advance or terminal illnesses, then I can fully see why this pattern exists.
Its not, you retard. Don't draw conclusions from a sample size of one.

Would you be okay with a woman making that kind of generalization after being treated badly by one man? Of course you wouldn't, so don't do the reverse, you're smarter than that.
 
Last edited:
Its not, you retard. Don't draw conclusions from a sample size of one.

Would you be okay with a woman making that kind of generalization after being treated badly by point, the one man? Of course you wouldn't, so don't do the reverse, you're smarter than that.
I would be totally fine with someone doing that.

You're being very sensitive.
 
Last edited:
hasn't this study been deboonked like a million times already

This appears to be a new one, but the old one? Yes, the men just died instead. If I remember correctly; if the woman was sick, ~6% ended in divorce; if the man was sick, ~1% divorce, ~6% deceased. I don't believe that there was any data on who initiated the divorce either, or why, it was just presented as the husband abandoning his wife. (I believe there were a few cases of "insurance fraud"). I swear, I've seen several trailers for films where the woman gets some terminal diagnosis and then drops everything, packs up, and runs off to "discover herself" or whatever. (this is one of the many reasons as to why I use an ad blocker)

Married men live longer than unmarried dont they?

You have to be careful with this sort of thing; I remember reading an article about a survey on "general happiness" where they had grouped "recently divorced" (significant risk of suicide in men) in with the "unmarried" and then decided that single men were miserable.
 
I think I have an idea as to why this is.

I saw a program on PBS that was all about a woman who had very bad cancer, or something very serious. It was a documentary about her and how her family members dropped almost everything in their lives to take care of her in the home.

The symptoms of the cancer were obviously very unbearable and extreme. She was seemingly suffering all the time.

When her husband was in the room with her without her kids, she gave him some of the worst verbal abuse I've ever heard in my entire life. It's like she hated him deeply for no reason at all. In

She would turn to the camera crew and tell them to look at how pathetic he looks. How fat he is. He's so awful. Blah blah blah. I think I actually blocked out most of what she said because I was so disturbed by it.

In fact, I've never seen that level of hate from anyone toward anything or anyone else. It was truly pure contempt. Absolutely nasty and disgusting.

I like to think that I'm a loyal person and that I would stick by my spouse no matter what. However, I know I couldn't if I was getting the level of treatment the husband got in this documentary.

If her behavior is at all indicative of some larger pattern of behavior from women who have advance or terminal illnesses, then I can fully see why this pattern exists.
Reminds me of this. Maybe shit like this is what influenced her views.
1742122357414.png
 
Link to the study.

Objective​


Building on the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management, this paper addresses the correlates of silver splits—voluntary union dissolutions after age 50—among mixed-gender couples in Europe focusing on the role of partners' health status.

Background​


Family diversity at older ages is growing in wealthy countries, with late union dissolutions increasingly occurring through separation and divorce rather than widowhood. Nonetheless, the correlates of silver splits in Europe, particularly regarding health within couples, remain underexplored.

Method​


We utilized data from the European Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement (SHARE), spanning Waves 1 (2004–2005) to 9 (2021–2022), and employed discrete-time event-history analysis to model the risk of silver splits, separately among couples aged 50–64 and 65+ (N = 31,915 and 48,361 couple-years, respectively). We inspected three health dimensions: self-rated health, Global Activity Limitations Index, depression.

Results​


We found a non-negligible and gendered association between health and union dissolution among couples aged 50–64. Couples in which the woman reported poor self-rated health or faced severe activity limitations, whereas the man maintained good health, exhibited a higher risk of silver splits compared to couples in good health. Conversely, the risk of silver splits did not change significantly when the man experienced poor self-rated health or activity limitations compared to couples in good health. Results among older couples suggested that the health/silver split link weakens with age.

Conclusion​


Gendered health-related selection effects appear among older European couples, as men struggle more than women with a partner's declining health, potentially jeopardizing the couple's stability.
 
Back