Science More Marriages End When Wives Get Sick Than When Husbands Do

Key points​

  • Research published in February investigated the vow to stand by a marriage in times of sickness.
  • Marriages are about seven times more likely to end when the wife becomes ill than when the husband does.
  • Most marriages do not end in divorce after a spouse becomes ill, even when the wife is the patient.
People who love being single and want to stay single, such as the single at heart, are often taunted with the question, “But who will be there for you in later life? What if you get sick?” The assumption seems to be that married people have nothing to worry about. After all, they made the vow to be there for each other “in sickness and in health.”

Research just published in February (2025) in the Journal of Marriage and Family shows that the vow to stand by a marriage in times of sickness is not so sturdy when it is the wife in a heterosexual couple who becomes ill.
The Italian social scientists Daniele Vignoli, Giammarco Alderotti, and Cecilia Tomassini, in an 18-year study, tracked more than 25,000 heterosexual couples, ages 50 and older, from 27 European nations. The participants were surveyed repeatedly and asked each time about their health, depression, whether they had limitations on what they could do in everyday life without help, and whether they were still together. The findings were reported in “Partners’ health and silver splits in Europe: A gendered pattern?

Vignoli and his colleagues looked separately at the couples who were between the ages of 50 and 64 and the couples in which at least one partner was 65 and older. Their results were stronger for the younger couples.

Couples between the ages of 50 and 64​

For the 50- to 64-year-olds, when the wife was in poor health but the husband wasn’t, their marriage was more likely to end than when both were in good health. When the husband was in poor health but the wife wasn’t, they were no more likely to split than when both were in good health.

The same pattern emerged for everyday limitations. When the wife was severely limited in her ability to perform the tasks of everyday life but her husband wasn’t, the couple was more likely to divorce than when neither experienced severe limitations. Again, if the situation reversed and it was the husband who had severe limitations, the marriage was no more likely to end than if neither partner had severe limitations.

When a wife was depressed but her husband wasn’t, the marriage was more likely to end than if neither partner was depressed. But a marriage was at least as likely to end when the husband was depressed and the wife wasn’t.

Couples in which at least one partner was 65 or older​

For the older couples, depression mattered more than physical health or activity limitations. For depression, the gendered pattern emerged: If the wife was depressed but the husband wasn’t, the marriage was more likely to end than if neither was depressed. But if the husband was depressed and the wife wasn’t, the couple was no more likely to divorce.

Why is a marriage more likely to end when a wife gets sick than when a husband does?​

The researchers did not test any explanations for their findings, and they discuss them only briefly. They suggest that it is typically the wife who has the role of the caregiver and that it is more stressful for the couple when the wife is ill than when the husband is. They also note that women are often more financially dependent and economically vulnerable; those challenges could pose barriers to the wives who might want to exit a marriage.

I'd add that men may be more likely to go into a marriage expecting to be cared for. When the tables are turned and they are the ones who need to do the intensive caring, some will leave rather than step up.

Other important considerations​

This was not the first study to show that a heterosexual marriage is more likely to end when a wife becomes seriously ill than when a husband does. In a study of married people diagnosed with a brain tumor or multiple sclerosis, the partner was more likely to be “abandoned” (in the authors’ words) when it was the wife who was ill. In those cases, 21 percent of the marriages ended. When it was the husband who became seriously ill, just 3 percent of the couples divorced.
That’s a big difference—marriages are about seven times more likely to end when the wife becomes seriously ill than when the husband does. But those numbers also show that most marriages do not end in divorce after a spouse becomes ill. Even when the wife is the patient, only about 1 in 5 marriages end in the next couple of years.
 
I don't care if I die in horrible pain as a result, I am not letting another man finger my prostate.

And be gay? Hell no. I don't put the shopping down until it's in the house, I don't slow down unless the traffic light is red - not amber - and I don't get fingered. Why? Because I'm straight.
I don't like fucking (eta-having sex with, not a descriptor of said) robots, but I let them shove a speculum up my hoo-ha. Cancer is a shitty way to die. (ETA- You do not want to go out because you didn't get your ass checked, and suddenly it's in your blood, or lungs. You have people who love you, and can't deal with your final stage in pain screaming bastard attitude. Because, they love you. You should love yourself enough to stop cancer when it's a little bitch.)
 
Last edited:
It’s the same thing I suppose . A decent marriage = CARE of each other. Making healthier habits, a bit if a reminder about that doctors appointment, noticing a dodgy mole on your back you can’t see yourself.
Respectfully, I don't think it is the same thing. I'm not talking about having someone else to keep you functioning well. I'm talking about the deleterious effect on the psyche of being unwanted. Now that can lead to second order effects like unhealthy habits, like I mentioned in my post. But you're talking about the support of a partner. I'm talking about not having a real purpose in life - something which I think affects many men who are unmarried at a very deep level.

I keep getting told this, that women have these massive supper circles and I feel deficient in this aspect.
Well you have an excess in other areas, I'm certain!

But I think you know the effect I mean even if it doesn't match up with your experiences as much. You've seen female bonding and how it works. You are probably, as the psychologists would term it, low on Agreeableness. A miserable term imo, which I would simply call having Strength of Character or Objectivity. In any case, did you ever see that video of the woman who disguised herself as a man and talked extensively about how difficult and lonely she found it? That's the sort of contrast I'm talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syntaxion
Married men live longer than unmarried dont they? The effect is attributed to ‘good nagging.’ Which is ‘honey I’ve told you a million times go get that dodgy mole looked at/you really need to go and see the doc about that cough..’
And I've told you a million times what's a doctor going to do about a cough? My throat's just dry. Will you just get off my back about the cough already?
 
You are probably, as the psychologists would term it, low on Agreeableness.
Guilty as charged. Low as it gets. Never mind. Also supper circles? I mean support
I'm talking about the deleterious effect on the psyche of being unwanted.
Yes, I think I get what you mean. I suppose I’m saying that simply having someone there and a family is at least a partial purpose? But yeah I get the point about loneliness. It’s said to be worse for your health than obesity, smoking and all that stuff.
Lack of social connection, purpose in life is perhaps the deeper issue, and one way of combating it can be marriage?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Overly Serious
I've always been curious about the validity of the data here because the conclusion that men leave sick partners more is so widespread online but my personal experience is mostly (not entirely) with sick wives and caregiver husbands

I also notice that this pattern doesn't trigger the kind of fawning awe with nurses that extremely involved fathers does with teachers which leads me to believe it's not that really that unusual
 
It makes very little sense to leave a spouse if you're reasonably confident they will die in fairly short order, say three years or so. You will be their sole heir when they kick the bucket, but if you divorce the assets will be separated. You'll get more for sticking it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria
It makes very little sense to leave a spouse if you're reasonably confident they will die in fairly short order, say three years or so. You will be their sole heir when they kick the bucket, but if you divorce the assets will be separated. You'll get more for sticking it out.
I am unsure if this is a bit of musing independent of the story; or if you're suggesting that women are more more economically canny than men! :)
 
And I've told you a million times what's a doctor going to do about a cough? My throat's just dry. Will you just get off my back about the cough already?
*Dies of lung cancer three weeks later*
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Grub
I've always been curious about the validity of the data here because the conclusion that men leave sick partners more is so widespread online but my personal experience is mostly (not entirely) with sick wives and caregiver husbands
My personal experience is that almost all men left their sick partners. Not to power level but it happened with my cousin, dude was pretty much engaged to a new sidepiece when she died and we're all certain he was cheating on the side while she was dying in hospital. Of all the men I knew in such situations, only one stayed and he was an immediate family member.
 
And I've told you a million times what's a doctor going to do about a cough? My throat's just dry. Will you just get off my back about the cough already?
Oh mate, you’re going to spend the last six months of your life listening to, ‘if you’d only gone to the doctor when i told you, Brian, you’d not be in this situation!’
 
Oh mate, you’re going to spend the last six months of your life listening to, ‘if you’d only gone to the doctor when i told you, Brian, you’d not be in this situation!’
Fine I'll go to the bloody doctor's. I'm telling you it's just a waste of time just like every other time.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Otterly
I am unsure if this is a bit of musing independent of the story; or if you're suggesting that women are more more economically canny than men! :)
The thought that occurs to me is that you would have to be absolutely desperate to avoid any care giving responsibility to actually crack ahead with a legal divorce. It puts you in a much shittier position than being the widow or widower. Certainly in the UK it not only fucks up your ability to wind up the estate, it fucks up the amount of the estate you're entitled to (lol none) and if you have dependent kids who are inheriting, it makes all that much more difficult. It's just one of these things that's on paper so stupid to do, you would have be absolutely desperate to get away from the sick spouse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria
Then why'd my doctor fist me just now?
Maybe he's just into that?

I'm just basing that off a friend telling me that he finally worked up the courage to get a prostate check, and it was a blood test, not a finger. It could be completely incorrect, or perhaps he had some condition that required a blood test.... I'm closing in on 50 though, so I'm sure I'll learn soon enough.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Chunky Salsa
Back