More Yaniv autism

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
1 - The evidence harvesting of 2019 gathered up material Yaniv had spent years scattering around. Only month-to-month accretions since then. The biggest dump so far this year was the Babylon Telus summaries, which came to us via Jon's obsessed stalker who's willing to waste money into the BC court system.

2 - We can't screenshot what's not there in the first place. Yaniv's become more covert. The DMs that have reached us have come from MM bloggers befriending several girls who have had contact with Yaniv, including two - Katie and MandaPanda - who provided very in-depth information that's never been disputed.

3 - KF tradition says we must not engage. MM and jjyaniv.ca are free to do so. The Crows of Twitter are as well and shake shit loose now and again.

4 - We have few kiwis on the ground in BC - and at the moment, you're busy running off one of the best: WGKitty. Thanks a bunch.

5 - Release 1 scared off some good terven talent with day jobs and other women drifted off to more cloistered platforms to avoid incel stank like this:
View attachment 1282481
View attachment 1282482View attachment 1282483

Just what evidentiary miracle were you performing for us there? I've always wondered.
Holy shit the simping is real. If you haven't figured out that journalists only go to school to get their morals beaten out of them and replaced with Cultural Marxism and Cancel Culture, maybe ya should do some research.

Hey, Anna, the reason noone gives you any deets is because you've proven to be a sperg. We couldn't trust you to not take a victims identity and use it for clout on Twatter. Look at the paragraphs you spewed out here once it became apparent noone goes to you.

Keep sperging out on Twatter, though. I'm completely 100% positive that you will get juicy stories from your paragraphs calling us all liars, in other words. Oh, and don't forget, in Clown World victims get harrased and perpatrators get protected.

I guess thats a good chunk of why TPM is irrelevant. Noone cares when your site name is associated with lazy and entitled people. If you want to make sure you do nothing but work for 5th column "activists", keep locking your name into chimpouts while "working" for TPM. You'll end up like Yaniv where people will Google your name/social handles and say "Nope."
 
Last edited:
1 - The evidence harvesting of 2019 gathered up material Yaniv had spent years scattering around. Only month-to-month accretions since then. The biggest dump so far this year was the Babylon Telus summaries, which came to us via Jon's obsessed stalker who's willing to waste money into the BC court system.

2 - We can't screenshot what's not there in the first place. Yaniv's become more covert. The DMs that have reached us have come from MM bloggers befriending several girls who have had contact with Yaniv, including two - Katie and MandaPanda - who provided very in-depth information that's never been disputed.

3 - KF tradition says we must not engage. MM and jjyaniv.ca are free to do so. The Crows of Twitter are as well and shake shit loose now and again.

4 - We have few kiwis on the ground in BC - and at the moment, you're busy running off one of the best: WGKitty. Thanks a bunch.

5 - Release 1 scared off some good terven talent with day jobs and other women drifted off to more cloistered platforms to avoid incel stank like this:
View attachment 1282481
View attachment 1282482View attachment 1282483

Just what evidentiary miracle were you performing for us there? I've always wondered.

Sometimes this thread gets pretty dark and sad. This is fucking hilarious. Thank you.
 
1 - The evidence harvesting of 2019 gathered up material Yaniv had spent years scattering around. Only month-to-month accretions since then. The biggest dump so far this year was the Babylon Telus summaries, which came to us via Jon's obsessed stalker who's willing to waste money into the BC court system.

2 - We can't screenshot what's not there in the first place. Yaniv's become more covert. The DMs that have reached us have come from MM bloggers befriending several girls who have had contact with Yaniv, including two - Katie and MandaPanda - who provided very in-depth information that's never been disputed.

3 - KF tradition says we must not engage. MM and jjyaniv.ca are free to do so. The Crows of Twitter are as well and shake shit loose now and again.

4 - We have few kiwis on the ground in BC - and at the moment, you're busy running off one of the best: WGKitty. Thanks a bunch.

5 - Release 1 scared off some good terven talent with day jobs and other women drifted off to more cloistered platforms to avoid incel stank like this:
View attachment 1282481
View attachment 1282482View attachment 1282483

Just what evidentiary miracle were you performing for us there? I've always wondered.

Isn't this the same guy who made a bunch of incredibly cringe filled a-logging videos about Russell Greer last year?

Well, at least thirst for Anna's booty explains the sudden hypocritical desire for 'quality posts' and 'verified info' and blatant white knighting because he sure didn't give a fuck before.
 
A kid going to a trusted adult (as always advised), giving details, and said adult approaching the police with all the info...going through the proper channels is "duping" folks? Okee dokee. Seems because all the evidence isn't being shouted from the rooftops then it must be a lie.

"confirmable evidence and screenshots"? - the same "confirmable evidence and screenshots" posted here over the last year or two that yaniv has always denied and claimed as "fake" and continues to do so?; the same "confirmable evidence and screenshots" he puts down to being from haters and transphobes on KF, Reddit and Twitter et al do you mean? He denies everything, every time, everywhere...and yet this latest incident he deserves the benefit of the doubt, really?

Strange, I don't remember WGkitty ever having to provide full evidence in their past posts - no screenshots were requested for the police/ambo visits, the mayhem and misery he causes his neighbours and such like...it seems their word was good enough then yet somehow isn't now. Yeah this is a far more serious accusation, not really comparable, but do you really think someone would risk the wrath of a sue-threat-happy, physically aggressive unstable yaniv if things weren't 100% kosher. Would you?

All you're doing is making terrible arguments, explaining why they're terrible and then moving on as if they aren't terrible.

Correct, the evidence isn't being shared so we do not know if it exists or if any of this happened. Maybe cool for you, not cool for me.

Correct, he denies everything so you'd better present your evidence in a convincing manner so that he can't shoot holes in it. In this case, if you want to argue that JY is gross and weird then all the puzzle pieces are here - but as soon as you start making claims that you can't (or won't?) prove then JY gets his chance to wiggle out.

Correct, none of the shit about when he calls ambulances or farts in elevators matters, while this is an accusation of a molesting a child so it's a little different. You nailed it.

There is a difference between evidence that JY claims he's done something - which screenshots and archives alone are legitimate for - and evidence that JY has done something. If I tweet that I punched an elderly woman today, that's great evidence for me being someone who claims to punch elderly women, but it is not great evidence for me having punched an old woman. If you think otherwise, all I have to do is say "lmao i tricked u" like JY and it immediately discredits you.

This is the simple division between standards of what was happening before and what was happening now. If we want evidence of what JY has said and done on twitter then screenshots and archives of his twitter will obviously suffice. On the other hand, JY is a notorious liar and running with articles about how he molested a 15 year old because he (a liar) supposedly, told someone (the source), who told someone else via screenshots that don't actually say anything about a 15 year old being involved is completely off the rails.

Look: https://jymeowmix.wordpress.com/2020/05/06/jy-allegedly-meets-teen-in-parking-lot-kisses-her/

We got a picture of him kissing a woman, excellent

+

We got a picture of him sexting, great

+

JY Sent a fake suicide note? Okay.
=
Conclusion: He's meeting 15 year olds in parking lots - wait, what? How? There's no evidence of this. The article says evidence exists, but does not present it. I'm not asking for proof that she's a 15 year old, which would obviously be an absurd request. I'm talking about proof that it was claimed she was a 15 year old. That would be the screenshots of the people contacting MeowMix. That's a good first step. For bonus points, how about an explanation for how the source came to the conclusion that it's a 15 year old? The initial article says that JY "bragged" about it - so show us. The update says that it was in a video call, which I know that I personally don't record so it's understandable that that doesn't exist, but you gotta give us something. Screenshots that these people are actually in contact with JY would work for me, personally, but clearly opinions differ on that standard.

All of the connective tissue that would actually makes these screenshots work together to prove that a 15 year old is involved is completely ethereal. Where is the material of him claiming that a 15 year old is involved? Where is the material of someone claiming that he claimed that the girl is 15 years old? The content presented here just doesn't add up - it's like someone got halfway into the story and started filling in the pieces with sources and allegations that they didn't have proof of because they wanted a great story.

The worst thing is I don't even think MeowMix is lying (Though they might be wrong), I just know that anyone with a skeptical eye on the internet should be seeing some massive holes in what was presented here. It feels like a MysteryWoman all over again where multiple webs of autism are intersecting with various forms of disinformation flying back and forth (Intentional and otherwise), except the disinformation seems to be benefiting JY. And just like MysteryWoman, I see why this works on KF. We're all biased against JY and probably want more reasons to make fun of him, but outside of this thread it just looks like pulling stories out of thin air.
 
Last edited:
All you're doing is making terrible arguments, explaining why they're terrible and then moving on as if they aren't terrible.

Correct, the evidence isn't being shared so we do not know if it exists or if any of this happened. Maybe cool for you, not cool for me.

Correct, he denies everything so you'd better present your evidence in a convincing manner so that he can't shoot holes in it. In this case, if you want to argue that JY is gross and weird then all the puzzle pieces are here - but as soon as you start making claims that you can't (or won't?) prove then JY gets his chance to wiggle out.

Correct, none of the shit about when he calls ambulances or farts in elevators matters, while this is an accusation of a molesting a child so it's a little different. You nailed it.

There is a difference between evidence that JY claims he's done something - which screenshots and archives alone are legitimate for - and evidence that JY has done something. If I tweet that I punched an elderly woman today, that's great evidence for me being someone who claims to punch elderly women, but it is not great evidence for me having punched an old woman. If you think otherwise, all I have to do is say "lmao i tricked u" like JY and it immediately discredits you.

This is the simple division between standards of what was happening before and what was happening now. If we want evidence of what JY has said and done on twitter then screenshots and archives of his twitter will obviously suffice. On the other hand, JY is a notorious liar and running with articles about how he molested a 15 year old because he (a liar) supposedly, told someone (the source), who told someone else via screenshots that don't actually say anything about a 15 year old being involved is completely off the rails.

Look: https://jymeowmix.wordpress.com/2020/05/06/jy-allegedly-meets-teen-in-parking-lot-kisses-her/

We got a picture of him kissing a woman, excellent

+

We got a picture of him sexting, great

+

JY Sent a fake suicide note? Okay.
=
Conclusion: He's meeting 15 year olds in parking lots - wait, what? How? There's no evidence of this. The article says evidence exists, but does not present it. I'm not asking for proof that she's a 15 year old, which would obviously be an absurd request. I'm talking about proof that it was claimed she was a 15 year old. That would be the screenshots of the people contacting MeowMix. That's a good first step. For bonus points, how about an explanation for how the source came to the conclusion that it's a 15 year old? The initial article says that JY "bragged" about it - so show us. The update says that it was in a video call, which I know that I personally don't record so it's understandable that that doesn't exist, but you gotta give us something. Screenshots that these people are actually in contact with JY would work for me, personally, but clearly opinions differ on that standard.

All of the connective tissue that would actually makes these screenshots work together to prove that a 15 year old is involved is completely ethereal. Where is the material of him claiming that a 15 year old is involved? Where is the material of someone claiming that he claimed that the girl is 15 years old? The content presented here just doesn't add up - it's like someone got halfway into the story and started filling in the pieces with sources and allegations that they didn't have proof of because they wanted a great story.

The worst thing is I don't even think MeowMix is lying (Though they might be wrong), I just know that anyone with a skeptical eye on the internet should be seeing some massive holes in what was presented here. It feels like a MysteryWoman all over again where multiple webs of autism are intersecting with various forms of disinformation flying back and forth (Intentional and otherwise), except the disinformation seems to be benefiting JY. And just like MysteryWoman, I see why this works on KF. We're all biased against JY and probably want more reasons to make fun of him, but outside of this thread it just looks like pulling stories out of thin air.
Do you think you might be taking this too seriously? I'm just here to talk shit about Yanny, and I think most others are in the same boat. It seems odd to me that you're sperging out so badly. You're inventing problems that don't exist IMO.
 
All you're doing is making terrible arguments, explaining why they're terrible and then moving on as if they aren't terrible.

Correct, the evidence isn't being shared so we do not know if it exists or if any of this happened. Maybe cool for you, not cool for me.

Correct, he denies everything so you'd better present your evidence in a convincing manner so that he can't shoot holes in it. In this case, if you want to argue that JY is gross and weird then all the puzzle pieces are here - but as soon as you start making claims that you can't (or won't?) prove then JY gets his chance to wiggle out.

Correct, none of the shit about when he calls ambulances or farts in elevators matters, while this is an accusation of a molesting a child so it's a little different. You nailed it.

There is a difference between evidence that JY claims he's done something - which screenshots and archives alone are legitimate for - and evidence that JY has done something. If I tweet that I punched an elderly woman today, that's great evidence for me being someone who claims to punch elderly women, but it is not great evidence for me having punched an old woman. If you think otherwise, all I have to do is say "lmao i tricked u" like JY and it immediately discredits you.

This is the simple division between standards of what was happening before and what was happening now. If we want evidence of what JY has said and done on twitter then screenshots and archives of his twitter will obviously suffice. On the other hand, JY is a notorious liar and running with articles about how he molested a 15 year old because he (a liar) supposedly, told someone (the source), who told someone else via screenshots that don't actually say anything about a 15 year old being involved is completely off the rails.

Look: https://jymeowmix.wordpress.com/2020/05/06/jy-allegedly-meets-teen-in-parking-lot-kisses-her/

We got a picture of him kissing a woman, excellent

+

We got a picture of him sexting, great

+

JY Sent a fake suicide note? Okay.
=
Conclusion: He's meeting 15 year olds in parking lots - wait, what? How? There's no evidence of this. The article says evidence exists, but does not present it. I'm not asking for proof that she's a 15 year old, which would obviously be an absurd request. I'm talking about proof that it was claimed she was a 15 year old. That would be the screenshots of the people contacting MeowMix. That's a good first step. For bonus points, how about an explanation for how the source came to the conclusion that it's a 15 year old? The initial article says that JY "bragged" about it - so show us. The update says that it was in a video call, which I know that I personally don't record so it's understandable that that doesn't exist, but you gotta give us something. Screenshots that these people are actually in contact with JY would work for me, personally, but clearly opinions differ on that standard.

All of the connective tissue that would actually makes these screenshots work together to prove that a 15 year old is involved is completely ethereal. Where is the material of him claiming that a 15 year old is involved? Where is the material of someone claiming that he claimed that the girl is 15 years old? The content presented here just doesn't add up - it's like someone got halfway into the story and started filling in the pieces with sources and allegations that they didn't have proof of because they wanted a great story.

The worst thing is I don't even think MeowMix is lying (Though they might be wrong), I just know that anyone with a skeptical eye on the internet should be seeing some massive holes in what was presented here. It feels like a MysteryWoman all over again where multiple webs of autism are intersecting with various forms of disinformation flying back and forth (Intentional and otherwise), except the disinformation seems to be benefiting JY. And just like MysteryWoman, I see why this works on KF. We're all biased against JY and probably want more reasons to make fun of him, but outside of this thread it just looks like pulling stories out of thin air.
..

Yaniv video called them and said that they (JY) were meeting with a 15 year old girl (they recall that JY said 15) in a parking lot, and then JY said, “I’m with my friend and she’s way prettier than you”, or something similar to those words. JY then ran up to the friend and, according to the girls, the friend looked very uncomfortable and awkward. It’s worth noting that the three girls commented among themselves after that the “friend” looked younger than them (aged 16-19).

..

Finally, while bragging about meeting the 15 year old girl, Yaniv was on webcam, where he exposed themselves, again. We’ve censored the image.

..

This picture was sent via Snapchat to a couple other girls, to whom JY bragged about meeting the 15 year old. One of these girls lives in another province, far from JY. JY used her Snapchat location and offered to travel to her to perform oral sex on her.

..

It’s also interesting to note that immediately after LangleyResident, and later Meow Mix and others, posted this story, Yaniv lashed out at the three girls (there was one more than originally reported) and threatened to sue them and expose them if they didn’t shut up.

..
Lots of spots in there that state that JY is the one that claimed she was 15. Seems like maybe MM is trying to find who it was exactly. I wonder if that will show the profile of a real 15 year old. Will that stop you from attempting to normalize how JY acts or how others react to him? People who evoke disgust tend to get treated like they are disgusting, what a shocker.

Title has allegedly in it. I see much the same type of careful wording throughout. There was two girls who came forward, but Yaniv lashed out at three with lawsuit claims. That part really makes me think that maybe this is a real claim, perhaps from one of the girls friends.

I've no problem giving people the benefit of the doubt and second chances, but I learned a long time ago how to deal with people like Yaniv. The first time you get burned, give them just enough rope to hang themselves, and drop them completely if they try to burn you a second time. Fuck your third strike rule. Play fair the first time and you wouldnt be scorned by everyone else, fatty.
 
Do you think you might be taking this too seriously? I'm just here to talk shit about Yanny, and I think most others are in the same boat. It seems odd to me that you're sperging out so badly. You're inventing problems that don't exist IMO.

I was asked to explain why the story isn't believable. That is why. If it's not a problem for you, that's cool I guess but it's not really my kinda party.
 
I was asked to explain why the story isn't believable. That is why. If it's not a problem for you, that's cool I guess but it's not really my kinda party.
You also got put on blast for being a gross af incel about Anna in this thread while bemoaning how the thread has been ruined by others, but somehow none of your 5TB spergouts have addressed that. 🤔
 
Lots of spots in there that state that JY is the one that claimed she was 15. Seems like maybe MM is trying to find who it was exactly. I wonder if that will show the profile of a real 15 year old. Will that stop you from attempting to normalize how JY acts or how others react to him? People who evoke disgust tend to get treated like they are disgusting, what a shocker.

Title has allegedly in it. I see much the same type of careful wording throughout. There was two girls who came forward, but Yaniv lashed out at three with lawsuit claims. That part really makes me think that maybe this is a real claim, perhaps from one of the girls friends.

I've no problem giving people the benefit of the doubt and second chances, but I learned a long time ago how to deal with people like Yaniv. The first time you get burned, give them just enough rope to hang themselves, and drop them completely if they try to burn you a second time. Fuck your third strike rule. Play fair the first time and you wouldnt be scorned by everyone else, fatty.

I don't know what to say my man, I tried to lay out as clearly as possible that I'm not convinced by the idea that someone says that someone says that JY said something when we can't even see evidence of someone saying that JY said it. You just telling me again that MM said that someone said something to someone is not reasonable response to anything I wrote so I'm at a bit of a loss here. That was my whole argument.

You also got put on blast for being a gross af incel about Anna in this thread while bemoaning how the thread has been ruined by others, but somehow none of your 5TB spergouts have addressed that. 🤔

You gotta be outright retarded to think I'm gonna defend myself for copypasta that you don't recognize. Back to Facebook, dude.
 
I don't know what to say my man, I tried to lay out as clearly as possible that I'm not convinced by the idea that someone says that someone says that JY said something when we can't even see evidence of someone saying that JY said it. You just telling me again that MM said that someone said something to someone is not reasonable response to anything I wrote so I'm at a bit of a loss here. That was my whole argument.

You gotta be outright exceptional to think I'm gonna defend myself for copypasta that you don't recognize. Back to Facebook, dude.


Your work on Yaniv's attempt to build an online porn biz and field a porn queen sock to prowl girls was exemplary. So was your work on updating the OP, which led to the FAQ for this subthread.

For years on other threads you've done solid research on cows and written it up in starkly factual form. Reading your stuff was a key reason I signed up for my first account and returned when Null put the site back up.

I get why you'd find the current situation in this subforum lackluster. If you'd piss less and lead more, the situation would be likelier to improve.

What work, for instance, is likely to open up new veins to mine on Yaniv's life without lapsing into gayops? You're superb at that. Do it by DM if that's smarter. Exclude me if you're mad at me.

Kick us forward instead of stomping us down.
 
With regards to evidence of the girl being 15, we have none. Only the word of 2 of the 3 girls from the video chat who say Yaniv said she was 15. We didn't speak with the 3rd girl.
We've seen a full face picture of her. It's hard estimating age but I certainly don't see her being 24. Wgkitty can weigh in if they want. She looks like the right age that would be friends with my teenage son.
We don't have a name, profiles, socials, anything about the 15/24 year old girl. Nothing at all. For all I know she was a random that JY paid 20 bucks to pose for a picture.
Having said that.... The story and timeline don't feel unbelievable to me, and it certainly fits his pattern of behaviour, right up to the part where he claims it was a troll op.
We're still digging for more but I feel we've hit a wall with her.
 
I'm not asking for proof that she's a 15 year old, which would obviously be an absurd request. I'm talking about proof that it was claimed she was a 15 year old
Screenshot_20200510-200644_Twitter.jpg


There, are you happy now or are you going to move the bar because I've provided you with what you asked for?
 
Ladies please, let’s not forget Who the real enemy is here.
Yeah these threads have been so autistic lately that I've been focusing on other cows and threads.

But I will say I'm genuinely disappointed in Anna; I seriously thought she was better than what her meltdown showed. Way to take an issue that's affecting a good number of teenage girls and make it all about your adult ass.
 
Back