Morgan Eli Kohl / AlexReynard - Furry Rescue Rangerphile with Odd Rape Obsession

[GS 281]

I see in your profile that you're 34, Morgan. That makes you a little older than me, but not much. It also means both of us are old enough to clearly remember the days when the internet wasn't really available to the masses like it is today.

So, what things did you do, and where did you direct your spergitude to before you had the internet available to feed your desires and spray your ideas across?

He watched Tiny Toons, Duck Tales and fapped to C&DRR like a normal chubby teenager.

 

[AnOminous]

A character willingly offering themselves as food is a special brand of unsettling.

There was this.

 

[GS 281]

FurAffinity is back up and just reviewing his comment sections brings about the greatest of irony.
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2265437/
http://archive.is/UhRxS

From the time ED was down and he thought his page would be gone permanently.

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2265437/
http://archive.is/UhRxS

RAPE: A One-Act Play

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2165204/
http://archive.is/UhRxS

A big ass rant about how his drawn furry child porn not being allowed on FurAffinity is a personal attack

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2272587/
http://archive.is/pSqW2

His final message after being banhammered for 10 years because of said furry CP

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2485020/
http://archive.is/zgn3h

 

[David Chuggins]

RAPE: A One-Act Play

Because rape is a bond between a man and a woman?

 

[AnOminous]

FurAffinity is back up and just reviewing his comment sections

One of the funnier things every time ED goes down, which it does fairly often, is lolcows thinking their lolcowery has somehow been forever erased. They don't even realize that even if that happened, their continued cowing would just guarantee them becoming lolcows again anyway.

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

One of the funnier things every time ED goes down, which it does fairly often, is lolcows thinking their lolcowery has somehow been forever erased. They don't even realize that even if that happened, their continued cowing would just guarantee them becoming lolcows again anyway.

This. ED is just a shitty gossip encyclopedia. Just because Wikipedia goes down doesn't mean the actions of its subjects disappear.

 

[Piga Dgrifm]

Wikipedia isn't loading for me. Guess Hitler dindu nuffin after all.

 

[AnOminous]

What also confuses me about pages like this is, it's almost never anything new.

Autistic people don't understand things like this because lacking a theory of mind, they don't realize that not everyone already knows everything.

It was certainly new to people who weren't already familiar with your classic retardation, bizarre perversions, and freakish behavior.

Why is there lush, green Michigan grass growing but you have a snow shovel sitting outside the house?

That's an almost random thing to notice.

Not bitching, I love the autism of this site that someone will notice something like that. I'm pretty sure, though, that I almost always have a snow shovel on the front porch. That way it's there if I need it, whenever I need it, and I don't have to remember where it is.

I have a screenshot of you saying you live close enough to see my snow shovels. Is that second hand?

Living near a retard and knowing that the retard is retarded and saying that the retard is retarded isn't stalking.

The way he used "Reynard" in his name, I assume he was a fan of the classic tale.

Every literate furry is.

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

FurAffinity is back up and just reviewing his comment sections brings about the greatest of irony.
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2265437/
http://archive.is/UhRxS

From the time ED was down and he thought his page would be gone permanently.

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2265437/
http://archive.is/UhRxS
View attachment 76158

RAPE: A One-Act Play

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2165204/
http://archive.is/UhRxS
View attachment 76160

A big ass rant about how his drawn furry child porn not being allowed on FurAffinity is a personal attack

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2272587/
http://archive.is/pSqW2

His final message after being banhammered for 10 years because of said furry CP

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2485020/
http://archive.is/zgn3h
View attachment 76161

I don't know what to say about any of this.

 

[José Mourinho]

Hey @AlexReynard , stop reporting your dox here lol it's forever for here to stay:

 

[GS 281]

Hey @AlexReynard , stop reporting your dox here lol it's forever for here to stay:

 

[cumrobbery]

Sick station wagon

 

[BILLY MAYS]

@AlexReynard please post a 500 word essay on why your dox should be removed.

 

[Cthulu]

Sick station wagon

Foxy love wagon

 

[AlexReynard]

@AlexReynard how much more prevalent is women-on-men rape, compared to men-on-women rape in your opinion?

I have no idea. I've never argued that. My point has always been that we've never bothered to do unbiased research. Essentially, the people who wrote our first rape laws were living with the stereotype that men are always sexual aggressors and women are always sexually passive. So the language of the law made it clear that it was only a crime for a man to force a woman to have sex, not vice versa. Because people couldn't even conceive of the reverse happening. So this took a stereotype and legitimized it by building a law on top of it. Then in the 60s, we started paying more serious attention to the scope of rape. And while that was a good idea, researchers ended up reinforcing stereotypical views by only asking women about victimization and only asking men about perpetration. So the stereotype is now reinforced twice, by law and science. The idea is normalized that it's only rape when a man does it, further blinding people to asking whether the reverse ever happens.

Now cut to a few years ago. The CDC did a massive survey called the National Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Survey. Their results showed a vast difference between the numbers of female and male rape victims. Yet, when someone looked at their data, they realized that they actually had asked men about victimization by women, but they deliberately did not classify this as rape. They called it "forced to penetrate". And the numbers showed that, for the previous 12 months, 1,270,000 women reported having been raped, and 1,267,000 men reported being "forced to penetrate". 98% of women reported their attacker was male, 80% of men reported their attacker as female. So these numbers don't prove anything in and of themselves. But they absolutely suggest that, if we were actually doing research unblinded by stereotypes, our perception of rape would likely be a hell of a lot different than it is now.

So, what things did you do, and where did you direct your spergitude to before you had the internet available to feed your desires and spray your ideas across?

Read books, watched TV, played outside. I was a kid then.

 

[GS 281]

Now cut to a few years ago. The CDC did a massive survey called the National Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Survey. Their results showed a vast difference between the numbers of female and male rape victims. Yet, when someone looked at their data, they realized that they actually had asked men about victimization by women, but they deliberately did not classify this as rape. They called it "forced to penetrate". And the numbers showed that, for the previous 12 months, 1,270,000 women reported having been raped, and 1,267,000 men reported being "forced to penetrate". 98% of women reported their attacker was male, 80% of men reported their attacker as female. So these numbers don't prove anything in and of themselves. But they absolutely suggest that, if we were actually doing research unblinded by stereotypes, our perception of rape would likely be a hell of a lot different than it is now.

Nigga, you loveshy as hell.

 

[Jewelsmakerguy]

One of the funnier things every time ED goes down, which it does fairly often, is lolcows thinking their lolcowery has somehow been forever erased. They don't even realize that even if that happened, their continued cowing would just guarantee them becoming lolcows again anyway.

This is something I never got about lolcows.

Just because people can't find out about you (temporarily), doesn't mean they won't stop knowing about your moronic misdeeds. Those journal entries @AlexReynard wrote is evidence of that. The same with trying to edit/delete the ED page you may have (rightfully, in most cases) deserved. It's only going to make you look worse in the eyes of the people you're trying to prove too.

 

[gophergoober]

Fun fact, doxxing someone is not illegal if your records are out in public, all people have been doing is getting that one public document your in and pulling the string and unraveling information about you, the Kiwi farms resident legal expert has spoken.

Keep it up Sneasel I am loving this thread, your the real MVP.

 

[Bugaboo]

Does the fact that the Tiny Toons characters are children bother you when drawing weird porn?

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

I have no idea. I've never argued that. My point has always been that we've never bothered to do unbiased research. Essentially, the people who wrote our first rape laws were living with the stereotype that men are always sexual aggressors and women are always sexually passive. So the language of the law made it clear that it was only a crime for a man to force a woman to have sex, not vice versa. Because people couldn't even conceive of the reverse happening. So this took a stereotype and legitimized it by building a law on top of it. Then in the 60s, we started paying more serious attention to the scope of rape. And while that was a good idea, researchers ended up reinforcing stereotypical views by only asking women about victimization and only asking men about perpetration. So the stereotype is now reinforced twice, by law and science. The idea is normalized that it's only rape when a man does it, further blinding people to asking whether the reverse ever happens.

Now cut to a few years ago. The CDC did a massive survey called the National Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Survey. Their results showed a vast difference between the numbers of female and male rape victims. Yet, when someone looked at their data, they realized that they actually had asked men about victimization by women, but they deliberately did not classify this as rape. They called it "forced to penetrate". And the numbers showed that, for the previous 12 months, 1,270,000 women reported having been raped, and 1,267,000 men reported being "forced to penetrate". 98% of women reported their attacker was male, 80% of men reported their attacker as female. So these numbers don't prove anything in and of themselves. But they absolutely suggest that, if we were actually doing research unblinded by stereotypes, our perception of rape would likely be a hell of a lot different than it is now.

A link to the CDC's Study:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm

The study makes a distinction between "Sexual Violence" and "Intimate Partner Violence". The latter mostly involves emotional and physical abuse from romantic partners, and can be sexual in nature.

TL;DR of Morgan's argument: this distinction is disingenuous because it contributes to rape framed only as a "woman's problem". He believes this means we should reevaluate our understanding of rape, and presumably advocates for a more liberal interpretation of it to include men who don't feel like having sex being pressured by their girlfriends/wives.

What he doesn't grasp is even with a liberal interpretation, this study still suggests women are significantly more likely to be victimized by all forms of sexual and intimate violence.

Read books, watched TV, played outside. I was a kid then.

What kinds of books did you read?