Crime Motorist shoots dead two environmental protesters blocking a road - Driver caught in traffic gets out of his car and guns down demonstrators when they refuse to move in Panama

  • Shocking footage shows the man gunning down two environmental protesters in Chame, Panama
  • The pair were killed and one person was arrested in connection with the incident, officials said
  • ***WARNING: CONTAINS GRAPHIC IMAGES***
By CHRIS JEWERS
PUBLISHED: 09:46 EST, 8 November 2023 | UPDATED: 12:08 EST, 8 November 2023

This is the shocking moment a motorist shot dead two environmental demonstrators at near point blank range after becoming enraged over their road blockade in Panama.

Harrowing images captured the shooter, a frustrated elderly man, climbing out of his car to argue with the eco-protesters who had stopped traffic on the Pan-American Highway in the town of Chame.

He initially attempted to reason with the protesters, but moments later pulled a handgun from his pocket and began gesturing wildly as his frustration grew. Despite the imminent danger, the protesters stubbornly refused to curtail their demonstration and continued to argue back and forth with the disgruntled motorist, who became visibly more enraged with each passing moment.

For a time it looked as though the gunman was prepared to back down, but when one protester holding a flag stepped towards him, he snapped the pistol back up and fired at his target from mere feet away.

Terrified onlookers and other protesters helped move the victim to the side of the road and laid him down on the ground as the gunman calmly began dismantling a small barricade made of stones and tyres erected by the demonstrators.

Still undeterred, another protester wearing a black t-shirt and jeans tried to confront the gunman and was also shot. Footage shows how he recoiled from the shot, holding his upper chest in pain and with an expression of disbelief on his face.

He is shown hobbling away to the side of the road as other protesters run for cover, before slumping to the ground.

Horrified friends of the victims rushed to their aid, with bystanders seen applying pressure to the wounds in an attempt to stem the blood loss - but neither victim survived their injuries.

Police descended on the scene and promptly arrested the shooter, dragging him away in cuffs and bundling him into the back of a squad car.

77558147-12725473-This_is_the_sh.jpg
This is the shocking moment an irate motorist shot dead an environmental protester in Panama. He went on to shoot another man in the incident before being detained

Motorist shoots dead two environmental protestors blocking the road



77557515-12725473-Police_also_pu.jpg
Police also published a photo of the detainee - an older man with greying hair and glasses - seated with one hand cuffed to a pipe, either in a police station or van. He was earlier seen walking down the road towards the protesters
77563025-12725473-The_man_was_se.jpg
The man was seen pulling a gun from his pocket and waving it in front of the protesters in the middle of the road
77563021-12725473-The_man_is_see.jpg
The man is seen gesturing with the handgun in his right hand, as he argues with the protesters blocking the road
77557519-12725473-One_man_seen_i.jpg
One man, seen in a black t-shirt holding a flag, got into a heated argument with the man (lfet). The video cuts to the man holding the flag falling to the ground
77557513-12725473-This_is_the_sh.jpg
This is the shocking moment one of two environmental protesters blocking a road in Panama was shot dead by an irate driver
77557517-12725473-The_first_man.jpg
The first man to be shot is seen being treated on the ground
77558119-12725473-A_second_man_a.jpg
A second man also confronted the gunmen. This photo was taken moments before he was also shot by the angry motorist in Chame, Panama

The tragic incident came amid the latest round of protests in a three-week long demonstration against a controversial government mining contract in the country, officials said.

Several avenues in the capital were blocked Tuesday by small groups of protesters, while the Pan-American Highway was obstructed in several spots, hindering transport of food, fuel and medicine.

The deaths followed local reports that a demonstrator was run over and killed on November 1 by a foreigner attempting to cross a roadblock during a protest in the west of the country.

The contract, given final approval October 20, allows the local subsidiary of Canadian mining company First Quantum Minerals to continue operating an open-pit copper mine in a richly biodiverse jungle west of the capital.

The contract is for the next 20 years - with the possibility of extending for a further 20 years if the mine remains productive.

Since protests began, the government nearly passed legislation that would have revoked the contract, but it backtracked in a late-evening debate at the National Assembly on November 2.

77560885-12725473-The_man_is_see.jpg
The man is seen standing in the middle of the road after being seen to have shot two people in the middle of the protest
77558139-12725473-A_man_is_seen.jpg
A man is seen holding a gun after walking up to a teachers' blockade on the Pan-American Highway in Chame
77559911-12725473-The_man_still.jpg
The man, still holding the handgun, is seen attempting to clear the blockade in the road
77558131-12725473-A_man_is_arres.jpg
A man is arrested after shooting two protesters with a gun in the middle of a teachers' blockade on the Pan-American Highway in Chame, Panama
77560819-12725473-The_angry_moto.jpg
The angry motorist is seen being put into the back of a police van after the shooting incident on Tuesday
77558137-12725473-People_react_a.jpg
People react after witnessing a man shoot two protesters with a gun in the middle of a teachers' blockade on the Pan-American Highway
77560801-12725473-A_woman_partic.jpg
A woman participates in a vigil for two two men killed in the shooting incident during Tuesday's protest

In an effort to calm tempers, congress last week passed a law that imposes a moratorium on new metal mining contracts and left it up to the Supreme Court to decide on whether to allow the contract with First Quantum Minerals.

Environmentalists have welcomed this decision by lawmakers, saying indeed it is the court that should rule on whether the contract violates the constitution.

But a powerful construction union called Suntracs, teachers unions and other organizations want the contract to be annulled through a law passed by Congress.

As a result, they are continuing their protests.

Source (Archive)
 
The report is totally false. There was never a climate protest or a Just Stop Oil protest. Environmental issues are not the same as climate concerns. This was an anti-gov, anti-corruption protest, their homeland's natural resources are at the risk of being sold for pennies against their will to foreign corporations.
The examples I mentioned previously were protests against the government as well. And, to add more info, they were leftist protests against a leftist government they voted for.

It's tragic these people had to die, but it's also tragic that we think they have the right to keep hundreds kidnapped because their cause could be correct.

Down here, we have absolute right to protest, but you have to first inform the police about it so they will help with traffic so no one gets hurt. I think it was a Chilean policeman who said something like "you can protest against the government and even against us but don't burn things down or hurt others". Once a year, we hold a major pro-life rally and the police sends traffic to other streets. Protests against Fujimori -that used to be massive- were also informed to the police so they can send cars to alternate roads.

This is ok:
img-2023-11-10-21-57-26.png

This is not:
img-2023-11-10-21-58-50.png
 
It's tragic these people had to die, but it's also tragic that we think they have the right to keep hundreds kidnapped because their cause is correct

Down here, we have absolute right to protest, but you have to first inform the police about it
Having your protests first having to be okayed by the government you're protesting against is quite possibly the most retarded cope I've ever heard
 
These nigger-brain subhumans have never stood for anything and never plan to stand for anything, they will deep-throat corporate interests until the day they die
Unless you really believe all your simping will bring them back to life and clog up the road again no amount of your tryhard bullshit has any point, so chill a bit or something. Or don't and blow a gasket. Chimpouts are funny.
 
Having your protests first having to be okayed by the government you're protesting against is quite possibly the most retarded cope I've ever heard
We have that here, too. New York is pretty good about not having protests cause more than the literal minor inconvenience you're claiming shutting down entire thoroughfares to all traffic cause. Because yes you don't just let a bunch of retards completely shut down everything. Protest is one thing, depriving other people of their rights because you're a spiteful little piece of shit is a crime.
 
Having your protests first having to be okayed by the government you're protesting against is quite possibly the most retarded cope I've ever heard
I didn't say ask for permission: I said inform the police. It's not the same.

This one wasn't informed beforehand, it was spontaneous due to a current success.

img-2023-11-10-22-10-44.png

And yet, the police still went there and helped with the traffic and protestors cooperated because random people were not the enemy to fight: it was the government.
 
And yet, the police still went there and helped with the traffic and protestors cooperated because random people were not the enemy to fight: it was the government.
Police are your enemy, especially if you're protesting the government and government corruption, because police are the government, they are the force that supports government law
 
Heres a protest in the nations capital in front of their legislative building. Which protest do you think got more attention? The one in front of the capital or the one on a highway in the middle of the countryside? The only reason anybody is talking about these highway protest is because of the boomer.
That is an excellent point.
How many of us knew about this mining contract with Canada before this boomer shot those guys? How many people coming across these articles in mainstream news knew about it? How many people just learned about this shit, only because a fed-up old man killed two guys for blocking traffic?

He just did more for their cause than they did.
Sucks they didn't protest somewhere more effective, where they could be noticed without dying for the news cycle.
 
Thinking that it's not ok* to shoot protesters (because there are several other ways to deal with people blocking the road that don't involve murder)
doesn't automatically mean you think its ok to block ambulances or that you agree with the way they're protesting.

*not okay, but understandable because he at least did try to reason with them first. It's just unfortunate it lead to this.

Is A&N against the idea of protests in general? Because protests are meant to be disruptive. I know not all protests are the same because as earlier posts mentioned, you could do it directly at the place you're protesting against and not in some important road or thoroughfare, but even then, there's always going to be some risk of blocking, say, ambulances, from getting to their destination.
I think this specific tactic- i.e. blocking large or critical roadways- has become both so prevalent and so hated that it's in a special class, now. That's why you see some US states passing laws making it very hard to sue or prosecute people who run down "protesters" on a highway. Not to mention, it's very easy to create such a blockage compared to the massive effect it has.

Someone walking around city hall with signs and shouting slogans may be somewhat disruptive, but it's not the same. For one thing, people doing that are trying to get a message out so people will hopefully agree with them; people blocking roads like this are trying to intimidate and force people into agreeing with them. It's not "I'm right and I insist that you hear me say it." It's "either we get what we want, or you can't live a normal life."

As to your first sentence: Can we figure out a point at which there are enough dead kids and governmental inaction that it becomes acceptable, or even right, to compel the people blocking infrastructure to relent- even if at the point of a gun? What if they were blocking off an emergency room? Just to make the argument more direct. That would be very disruptive, as well.
 
I'm baffled by how many soy boys who fall to their knees by a traffic jam. Most countries don't allow entrance to public building in order to protest and, if they do it outside they will end up causing a traffic jam anyways. Still, and even if you were right the way he brandishes the weapon and kills two people who didn't pose any threat to him is indefensible. I'm sure this 77 yo american was late for work.


They spent two weeks blocking roads, honking and disturbing the general peace. It's a clear double standard that you have.
We live in a society where their is a concept of ordered liberty. As such, a person's rights has limits when they interfer with another person's rights. The balancing test thus requires a compromise.

In the trucker case, it's true that they blocked the streets immediately in front of the Canadian legislature. But viewed in context the seat of government is considered the quintessential public forum and should get significant leeway in such a balancing test. In addition, the protest site could for most people be detoured.

This protest was a little different. The site was some random highway. The people targeted were random individuals, not politicians. The highway, once you are on it has no easy detour.
A&Hers are literally basement dwelling incels who are such shitty people that they got banned from /pol/, so they decided to come here because they were told it's "based". They get their talking points from /pol/ tards, Fox News and Newsmax. They act like they're elderly bible thumpers despite usually being a lot younger than that. That's why they get super assblasted when someone doesn't love Republicans with all their being like they do.
How do you feel about religious extremists blocking access to abortion clinics?

Personally, I abhor abortion but those fucks should be arrested.
 
Police are your enemy, especially if you're protesting the government and government corruption, because police are the government, they are the force that supports government law
I feel like people here are confused... a protest isn't a armed uprising. I know it gets confusing with blm but normally protesters are not a riot.
 
If you're being held hostage shouldn't you be allowed to use lethal force?
Yes, but this is a semantic trap for retards. They don't want to accept that blocking traffic for hours is being held hostage because it doesn't involve dragging people and locking them inside some closed area.

If you're driving and a group makes you stop, you don't know their intentions. It could be simple protestors, but it could also be a trap to rob you. Your life could be in danger, you don't know more than what you see. Of course you are justified to use force, even lethal force, to escape.
 
Most countries don't allow entrance to public building in order to protest
Oh no! The corrupt government doesn't allow protesting in front of their building... pack it up boys, I guess we have to block major roads instead, which the corrupt government thankfully allows.

They spent two weeks blocking roads, honking and disturbing the general peace. It's a clear double standard that you have.
Yes, if you disregard all the ways that these two protests are different, they are totally the same and I have been owned.
 
If you're driving and a group makes you stop, you don't know their intentions. It could be simple protestors, but it could also be a trap to rob you. Your life could be in danger, you don't know more than what you see. Of course you are justified to use force, even lethal force, to escape.
There are situations like that, but this wasn't it. I'm not sure how much you're arguing about the general principle versus this shooting, but let's not pretend that this guy thought that he and the hundreds of vehicles also stuck were getting robbed there. Nor were they in danger of imminent, direct harm (in an earlier comment I argued that there are very real, but less direct, harms) the way people think of being literally held hostage. That's why he got out of his car and walked towards the people. He knew exactly what this was, from having to deal with it regularly, and he was fucking done with it.
 
Back