RU ‘Mr. Carlson is not correct’: Kremlin fact-checks Tucker on ‘interview’ claim harder than Fox News ever did

Link (Archive)

‘Mr. Carlson is not correct’: Kremlin fact-checks Tucker on ‘interview’ claim harder than Fox News ever did​

The Kremlin on Wednesday issued a fact-check to comments made by journalist Tucker Carlson ahead of the release of his interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Carlson the day prior published a video to X confirming the interview after the former Fox News host was spotted in Russia earlier this week.

In his remarks, Carlson outlined his reasoning for meeting Putin before questioning why he was the only Western journalist to attempt such an interview amid the country’s conflict with Ukraine.

“Not a single Western journalist has bothered to interview the president of the other country involved in this conflict, Vladimir Putin,” Carlson said. Most Americans have no idea why Putin invaded Ukraine, or what his goals are now. They’ve never heard his voice. That’s wrong.”

Yet shortly after releasing the video, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told Russian media outlets that Carlson’s allegations were incorrect.

“Mr. Carlson is not correct. In fact, there’s no way he could know this,” Peskov said. “We receive numerous requests for interviews with the president, but mostly, as far as countries in the collective West are concerned, these are from major network media: traditional TV channels and large newspapers that don’t even attempt to appear impartial in their coverage.”

Peskov added that Putin has “no desire to communicate with this kind of media” but agreed to Carlson’s request given that he “stands in clear contrast to the position of the traditional Anglo-Saxon media.”

Carlson’s interview, which has not yet been released, has stirred pushback from critics who fear the journalist will not only fail to push back on Putin but will instead amplify Kremlin propaganda.

And the Kremlin isn’t the only one to issue a fact-check on Carlson’s claims. Numerous journalists also noted on X that they had repeatedly attempted to interview Putin to no avail.

“Interesting to hear @TuckerCarlson claim that ‘no western journalist has bothered to interview’ Putin since the invasion of Ukraine,” BBC journalist Steve Rosenberg wrote. “We’ve lodged several requests with the Kremlin in the last 18 months. Always a ‘no’ for us.”
BFEEC2E0-1705-42BA-858D-C58C5FB17ACA.jpeg
Christiane Amanpour, CNN’s Chief International Anchor, likewise noted that Putin had been declining interview requests for several years.

“Does Tucker really think we journalists haven’t been trying to interview President Putin every day since his full scale invasion of Ukraine? It’s absurd — we’ll continue to ask for an interview, just as we have for years now.
FCB3F897-7B5C-4F94-93DA-FE78A1EC4096.jpeg
Russian journalist Yevgenia Albats, an expert on the KGB, described Carlson’s statement as “unbelievable.”

“Unbelievable! I am like hundreds of Russian journalists who have had to go into exile to keep reporting about the Kremlin’s war against Ukraine,” Albats wrote. “The alternative was to go to jail. And now this SoB is teaching us about good journalism, shooting from the $1000 Ritz suite in Moscow.”
1F2CB3BB-6378-4395-B86F-4B428478C919.jpeg
Carlson has repeatedly praised Putin in the past, even going so far as to suggest that the U.S. should side with Russia over Ukraine.

“It may be worth asking yourself, since it is getting pretty serious, what is this really about? Why do I hate Putin so much? Has Putin ever called me a racist? Has he threatened to get me fired for disagreeing with him?” Carlson said in 2022. “These are fair questions, and the answer to all of them is: ‘No.’ Vladimir Putin didn’t do any of that.”

The Wall Street Journal has reported that Carlson’s interview may go live on his website and X on Thursday.
 
The case seems pretty cut-and-dry and deliberately misconstrued just to make a deranged headline.
>Carlson suffering from main-character syndrome, falsely assumed he was the only press person to ever ask Putin for an interview
>Some russian spokesperson corrected him that plenty of press people asked for interviews, but they turned them down because they keep tabs on who shits on russia constantly and who doesn't

I can't blame the Russians, I've seen what journoscum do with other people who try to meet them half-way.

What I do remember is seeing an interview of Putin in my country many years ago, the interviewer was asking a lot of overtly hostile questions that in some cases were straight-up veiled insults. Towards the end, he asked the interviewer's name and wrote it down.
I'm guessing the Russians have done this for years on a larger scale, mapped it out based on who works for whom and now know exactly which networks they can expect neutral or favorable coverage from.

You're acting like they know the guy got fired in the first place. lol.

Give them like 5 years.
I still never really understood what exactly they fired him over.
I know it's over the clip of him doing that speech where he says that politics is more adversarial today than it is 40 years ago and that if you're doing an abortion for no reason just for the lolz, it's basically just child sacrifice. But what part of that clip was so controversial that he had to go? Most of the things he said are well in line with the public opinions of other fox news people.
 
I cannot disagree more here.
The only correct response to enemies of the people like CNN, NPR, MSNBC, etc, are to ice them out and whenever they're mentioned discredit and disqualify.
They have deliberately fabricated narratives that have resulted in political violence against Americans, burned cities, and massive crime.
I get the logic of wanting to ice out these people due to feeling they're disqualified, but that doesn't really help with discrediting them (with their own audiences) as they continue talking about whatever. You end up just limiting your own voice as you're reducing your general exposure.

It's helpful enough to get the exposure that many news outlets started making it a point to not talk to a lot of subjects, like Trump for instance, so as to avoid people finding out what they had to say.

I still never really understood what exactly they fired him over.
I know it's over the clip of him doing that speech where he says that politics is more adversarial today than it is 40 years ago and that if you're doing an abortion for no reason just for the lolz, it's basically just child sacrifice. But what part of that clip was so controversial that he had to go? Most of the things he said are well in line with the public opinions of other fox news people.
Part of what got Tucker fired was he was sorta at odd with much of the company. It had been a few years since his office basically cut off the fact checking department, they despised a lot of the other talking heads at the network like that judge Jeanine, and they also couldn't get good ads as so many companies were boycotting him. Then to top it off they had the dominion lawsuit where people were treating it as a crime to question voting machines or the possibility of election fraud.

So he wasn't on the same page politically as the Paul Ryan types of the network, they weren't promoting other figures on the network to help with their ratings, and the show's own ratings didn't matter as much since it couldn't get ads while also having this lurking fear that they could end up with another lawsuit if Tucker questioned election fraud.
 
Last edited:

"Kremlin fact-checks Tucker on ‘interview’ claim harder than Fox News ever did"​


Uh oh journo-fags. That's validating language. People might remember Russia as a bastion of truth when that damned, dirty Tucker Carlson tries and ultimately fails to deceive them into making statements about themselves that look bad.
 
Putin is right on not wanting to be interview by these morons. Do you imagine how that interview would go?

"Mr. Putin, did you help Donald Trump?"
"No."
"..."
"..."
"Do you hate gays?"
"No."
"But--"
"We don't cut minors' perfectly healthy organs to make them pretend they're the opposite sex."
"...but you're a Nazi!"
"I have respect for Jews and Israel."
*interviewer cries*
 
Putin is right on not wanting to be interview by these morons. Do you imagine how that interview would go?

"Mr. Putin, did you help Donald Trump?"
"No."
"..."
"..."
"Do you hate gays?"
"No."
"But--"
"We don't cut minors' perfectly healthy organs to make them pretend they're the opposite sex."
"...but you're a Nazi!"
"I have respect for Jews and Israel."
*interviewer cries*
But I thought a Nazi was anyone I didn't like! Damn the dictionary definition!
 
Then to top it off they had the dominion lawsuit where people were treating it as a crime to question voting machines or the possibility of election fraud.
Ah right, the lawsuit. Yeah getting your employer in legal trouble does make for understandable grounds.
The judgment against Carlson was completely fucked by the way. Obviously Dominion did meddle in the election, the head of Dominion voting systems at the time, a man named Dr. Coomer (no I'm not making this up that is his actual name) basically admitted to it in public. He specifically said "Donald Trump won't get re-elected. I made fucking sure of it." Past tense.
Mind you, if it was some media mogul saying this, there'd be some plausible deniability, he could still argue that he simply meant that he deceived the public into not voting for him with hitpieces etc. But when it's the guy in charge of the voting machines saying that, that's a confession to voter fraud in my eyes.
 
The judgment against Carlson was completely fucked by the way. Obviously Dominion did meddle in the election, the head of Dominion voting systems at the time, a man named Dr. Coomer (no I'm not making this up that is his actual name) basically admitted to it in public. He specifically said "Donald Trump won't get re-elected. I made fucking sure of it." Past tense.
That Coomer fucker also admitted that Dominions software was shit and riddled with bugs. (((BlackRock))) happens to be a major shareholder of both Fox and Dominion. No wonder they settled, controlled opposition at its finest.
 
I guess he may have incorrectly asserted something which he merely assumed to be true, but it's very minor, and everybody makes mistakes (for argument's sake, even if it was some dumb lie then it's nothing in the grand scheme of things, compared to MSM lies).
 
I guess he may have incorrectly asserted something which he merely assumed to be true, but it's very minor, and everybody makes mistakes (for argument's sake, even if it was some dumb lie then it's nothing in the grand scheme of things, compared to MSM lies).
No, he was right. None of them have interviewed Putin. He didn't say that they didn't ask for an interview, only that they didn't interview him. If they actually wanted an interview enough, I bet any of these western media outlets could have made it happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GloJojo
Ah right, the lawsuit. Yeah getting your employer in legal trouble does make for understandable grounds.
The judgment against Carlson was completely fucked by the way. Obviously Dominion did meddle in the election, the head of Dominion voting systems at the time, a man named Dr. Coomer (no I'm not making this up that is his actual name) basically admitted to it in public. He specifically said "Donald Trump won't get re-elected. I made fucking sure of it." Past tense.
Mind you, if it was some media mogul saying this, there'd be some plausible deniability, he could still argue that he simply meant that he deceived the public into not voting for him with hitpieces etc. But when it's the guy in charge of the voting machines saying that, that's a confession to voter fraud in my eyes.
Rumor was that firing Tucker was also part of the Fox-Dominion settlement, but it's unconfirmed.
 
Narrative media interviews terrorists = Fine.
Tucker interviews a world leader we are not in a direct war with = OH MY GOD EXECUTE HIM!
 
  • Like
Reactions: GloJojo
1. Why is it in Russian?
2. Why is it misspelled?
3. Whty does it look like a MMORPG guild's site from 2005?
1. Ukrop is a made up language and 99% of people in that place actually speak Russian.
2. It was created by misspelling Russian.
3. Because the creator is still a part of that MMORPG guild.

She's not Russian, guess what she is.
A (((skinwalker)))?
Obviously Dominion did meddle in the election, the head of Dominion voting systems at the time, a man named Dr. Coomer (no I'm not making this up that is his actual name) basically admitted to it in public. He specifically said "Donald Trump won't get re-elected. I made fucking sure of it." Past tense.
I worked as an election worker in an election in the Great White North some time ago.
We used the very same machines but the security procedures were much stricter and we had to swear a oath that we were non-partisan. We also require ID and address proof before you are allowed to vote in Canada. Oh and we were also paid a decent amount for our work.

From what I understand the 2020 US election had the machines rigged up to the internet for live results, the election workers were not non-partisan, no ID was required, there was a flood of fake mail-in ballots, and they shoved thousands of fake votes into the machines after they realized Trump had clearly won when they counted the results. That is why the live results were suddenly paused for hours as they scrambled to steal the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GloJojo
I wouldn't even know about this interview if it wasn't for the massive saltier than the dead sea reactions coming from shitlibs.

They are basically doing free advertising for tucker, just STFU you idiots.
 
Back