𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Norbert the Tiger said:
How quickly the bug eyed lefties pivot away from "it's a private company, it can do whatever it wants." Subhuman pig-like cretins utterly devoid of even the semblance of principles.





View attachment 3983625View attachment 3983622
Click to expand...
These "people" only care about free speech when it is them. It has always been so. They never, EVER even consider that the shoe might end up in the other food or care at all. They will scream and shout to demand all sorts of arbitrary control but the MOMENT they get caught by something that is even a FRACTION of the size of the retardation they pull they scream and cry out as they strike you.

Just look at all the spergs who were suddenly mad that Elon banned people impersonating him when the written rules say you can't impersonate people and how fast they went "oh but don't you believe in free speech? That means I should be able to pretend to be you and come out as a pedophile!" Ethan Klein is the perfect example.

These "people" were cheering every single arbitrary ban and one sided rule enforcement that happened when they were in control. Now they are screeching when they are subjected to a hundreth of what they dished out. They deserve no sympathy, and they should be roundly mocked for their turn around at every point.

People might get mad Elon banned Ye, and that is fair. I want actual reasons for the ban that are solid and not "the Juden got mad at him", but for them to claim Elon is "out of line"? To pretend they give the slightest shit about the principle of the thing? To complain now that Twitter needs to be "regulated" once the ownership passed from a pahjeet on the head of a Party Approved troika that spent 24/7 hunting down anime avatars who said the n-word to some retarded boer who told his employees to start actually working and make banning CP and actual crimes a priority?

No. These people don't have any sort of principles, only objectives. They don't believe in bad methods, only bad targets. They don't care about the means, only the ends. They want you dead, your children raped and brainwashed, your culture destroyed and perverted, and they think it is moral and justified.

Suffer not the Globalist to live.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Burger Feet, Irrational Exuberance, Idiot Asshole and 19 others
Vott said:
You know the whole Musk Twitter thing is getting good when even someone on the farms gets upset about it which is quite impressive how the fallout has even reached here, Think I'll be the one in the room here to ask what got you so upset and riled up in the first place, If so I'll listen to what you have to say about it @Oxyjen. We're here to laugh at those freaking out about the Twitter safe space being taken away and Elon Musk himself if he ever humiliates himself in the process, Not get angry over it.
View attachment 3983571
View attachment 3983577
View attachment 3983586View attachment 3983580View attachment 3983595
View attachment 3983808
Click to expand...
She's made it distressingly clear over the last few weeks that she subscribes to the same binary thinking twittertards do that anyone laughing at the current drama is one of those nerdy Musk fanboys instead of people who think bluechecks are retarded.
I just want to know what her handle is because it's obvious she spends a lot of time on a non-lurking Twitter acc.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Netizennameless, Bananadana, Sperghetti and 11 others
Absolutego said:
She's made it distressingly clear over the last few weeks that she subscribes to the same binary thinking twittertards do that anyone laughing at the current drama is one of those nerdy Musk fanboys instead of people who think bluechecks are retarded.
I just want to know what her handle is because it's obvious she spends a lot of time on a non-lurking Twitter acc.
Click to expand...

Oxyjen is a femoid? That certainly explains some things.
 
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Safir, Chiri, secret watcher and 8 others
Vott said:
You know the whole Musk Twitter thing is getting good when even someone on the farms gets upset about it which is quite impressive how the fallout has even reached here, Think I'll be the one in the room here to ask what got you so upset and riled up in the first place, If so I'll listen to what you have to say about it @Oxyjen. We're here to laugh at those freaking out about the Twitter safe space being taken away and Elon Musk himself if he ever humiliates himself in the process, Not get angry over it.
View attachment 3983571
View attachment 3983577
View attachment 3983586View attachment 3983580View attachment 3983595
View attachment 3983808
Click to expand...
Hi mom I'm in Internet screenshot on the best website ever.
Don't bully Oxyjen though, she's cool, and she's probably the only other person on the site other than me that dislikes the Republicucks and blompf lul (nobody tell her that for different reasons!)
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Safir, Netizennameless, Jub-Jub and 14 others
Get your shitposting in before Twitter goes down around 4:55 EST

TwiterGoingDown.PNG
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Informative
Reactions: secret watcher, Wooo, Neznaiu98 and 9 others
George Lucas said:
Nick Fuentes works for Ye and now the media is going to dish out hit pieces and screech about denooncing for the next two years.
Click to expand...
sure but what does the republican party have to do with anything

1670014140887.png
Ah yes, you're only allowed to matter if you're positive, and being negative about things I think are bad is positive.

Just the concept that negativity should be artificially suppressed promotes disgenic thinking. It doesn't take much beyond letting it thrive to then be able to pick and choose which to amplify and suppress. This is ultimately why dislikes have been being removed from all these platforms over recent years. The dislike is perhaps one of the best defenses against online brain rot. The ability to just dislike something and not have to justify yourself is the bedrock of human agency. But of course we can see the growing sense in the social ether that you can only dislike things after approval from those who'd rather have your agency for themselves.

In fact it turns out propaganda is much more effective at subverting healthy people when you take away the acceptability of just disliking something. If you force normal people to argue and you've deliberately given them broken rhetorical tools (thanks fox news and other counterfeit conservatives) while the other side is allowed to simply dislike any observable fact let alone rhetorical tool that stands against them, the outcome is predictable.

1670014251734.png
Ah yes, pretend you're banning extremism when you remove alternative coordinating voices simply because you're not banning the masses of normies who are left with only approved narrative spinners to guide them.

Also most worthwhile people in that vein aren't unbanned yet. As of now this looks like more of the same with a new coat of paint, which I suppose was the predictable outcome. Though I do hold out some hope yet because it's still early.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Sperghetti, ProstateMaster, Sexual Chocolate and 6 others
Lichen Bark said:
I watched the entire 2h48min presentation last night, was pretty interesting. Here are some of the cool bits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YreDYmXTYi4

You can only read/control areas of the brain that have the neuralink threads in them, so if you wanted to make someone see, you'd need to put the threads into the visual cortex part of the brain, if you wanted to make them walk, it needs to go in the motor cortex of the brain. It wont be easy to control people memories with this type of device, because of how the brain is designed, memories are deeper in the brain, and this region is harder to get to with the needles and electrodes. There are limited electrode threads on each neuralink, so they have to be choosy about the location, they are nowhere near reading a whole brain.

They have these monkeys with the neuralinks control mouse cursors with their minds. When the monkey thinks "up" the mouse goes up, when the monkey thinks "down" it goes down etc. The strange thing the mouse control ability changes every day, different neurons fire the next day when the monkey thinks "up", and this causes the mouse to move with a bias. It's like if I thought about "banana" on Monday, the neuralink might read which neurons were activated, and interpret this as "banana." If I did this same thing again on Thursday, and thought again about "banana," things would fire slightly differently, and the neuralink would have some difficulty interpreting things. They need to figure out a way to compensate for this constant change.

There is this layer under you skull called the dura, a tough membrane, they remove this and it lets their surgical robot jab the electrodes into the brain. This happens faster than im comfortable with, but apparently the brain moves so much it needs to be quick. The robot can see blood vessels and avoids them when putting in the electrodes. The one issue with removing the dura layer is that the body will replace it with scar tissue, and this can be a problem when they want to remove it, as there is all this tissue growing around the device. They want to do the surgery right through the dura in the future, and not remove it, but this poses a problem, because now they cant see the blood vessels as easily.

They have an entire team that just works on needle prototyping, and they use lasers to ablate the metal and make different needle shapes to test how well they insert the electrodes.

They have a pig and they can control it's leg movements. They added another neuralink device into the pig's spine, and this lets them do things with the pigs leg muscles. all remotely. Seen here:
This is promising because they could use two neuralinks, one in the head and one after the part where the break in the spinal cord is, and potentially let people walk again. Over time moisture actually diffuses through the polymer material into the neuralink, and eventually cause the electronics to fail, so replacement has to be easy. Could be around the 5 year mark, but more testing is needed in this area. They device monitors it's internal humidity. The motor cortex (controls movement) is on the outside of the brain, so it's easier to access.

I hope Musk waits 10 years before doing elective brain surgery, he has an important mind, and I don't think the shareholders would like it if he gets poking around in that area. I'm not sure the upside of faster computer control is worth the downside, like a stroke or some other brain issue. He's going to probably run head first (heh) into getting this done, and his engineering side might not appreciate that the human body isn't quite like lego, even though he seems to think it is.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the summary, I watched the bits you linked to.

I have a feeling that any human who got this surgery at this point in time would end up dying horribly. Your meninges are there for a reason, and replacing one of them with scar tissue seems like it would have terrible long-term consequences.

With regards to movement: the motor cortex is indeed on the surface of your brain, but most of the areas for fine-tuning and adjusting movement are way deep down in the gooey stuff (in the basal ganglia and cerebellum).

Unless I'm missing something I don't know how you would get much useful movement without that input. It is a huge step from controlling one flexor/extensor set on a pig to something like walking upright, but then even if you got the basic walking process right you'd have to do it in a way that constantly maintains balance and doesn't send you careening into walls or falling over as soon as there is a slight change in angle or you have to turn your head to look at something. Maybe I'm just a downer, though!

It's interesting research and I'm glad it's happening but I suspect all the talk about Musk getting surgery himself is just publicity to get his fanboys hyped up.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance
Maybe this election interference story is meant to buttress the unbannings and they'll happen after this. :optimistic:

I'd be glad to be wrong but I'm pretty sure the people responsible for the crimes done don't have to care one bit about this story at this point. Who's going to hold them accountable?
If Trump would pull his thumbs out of his ass and get back on twitter, it'd be exactly what he should do to back Musk up and promise to hold them accountable, so much so that Elon probably had that in mind.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back