My hypothesis on the universe

[ArgonianVoter]

straight to the point here's my theory:
Energy is tangential to gravity our reality is spinning around a centerfold; and that photons appear frozen in time to us because they have so much greater energy that they do not experience the same coriolis effect that we do. but; the more energy something has the slower it will experience time which should be plausible to be observed through halflives and if we treat a materials energy as a form of density then we can build a scale on the premises that each material will have less energy going down that scale the bottom being completely depleted materials which are experiencing time the fastest while the highest (photons) are experiencing it the slowest; and that in this photons do experience time but for the entire course of the universe that we experience to a photon less than a second will have passed

If our universe is orbiting, there would need to be some kind of massive central force or structure it’s revolving around like that of a higher-dimensional object, or an object of like dimensions.

we have already observed that particles have cousins (quantum entanglement), I believe our universe is orbitting itself and is not one but two or more instances of its own matter.

this orbit could explain some cosmic phenomena like cosmic inflation, dark energy.

I'm calling this the universe tied theory, because it would mean the universe is woven/tied together in on itself.

 

[Nicholas Gur]

If our universe is orbiting, there would need to be some kind of massive central force or structure it’s revolving around

The scientific term is "yo momma"

 

[We Are The Witches]

What you're saying makes no sense.

- "photons appear frozen in time to us"
Explain.

- "the more energy something has the slower it will experience time"
How? And what energy are you talking about?

The next blob is just words together with no substantial meaning.

- "If our universe is orbiting"
What "universe" is orbiting? How do you know it's orbiting?

 

[Justice Tony]

Why would I adopt your theory when the Big Bang and Genesis is all I need to understand things?

 

[ArgonianVoter]

What you're saying makes no sense.

- "photons appear frozen in time to us"
Explain.

- "the more energy something has the slower it will experience time"
How? And what energy are you talking about?

The next blob is just words together with no substantial meaning.

- "If our universe is orbiting"
What "universe" is orbiting? How do you know it's orbiting?

3.) We don't, it's a guess that our universes matter is orbiting entangled cousins of itself.
1.) from the photon's perspective, no time passes at all, A photon emitted from a distant star billions of light-years away reaches Earth instantaneously in its own frame of reference, according to special relativity

 

[Kingfisher9000]

the more energy something has the slower it will experience time

One may observe this effect by consuming amphetamines. You can clean your entire house top to bottom, but afterward only an hour has passed.

 

[We Are The Witches]

3.) We don't, it's a guess that our universes matter is orbiting entangled cousins of itself.
1.) from the photon's perspective, no time passes at all, A photon emitted from a distant star billions of light-years away reaches Earth instantaneously in its own frame of reference, according to special relativity

The first is an assumption, the seconds makes no sense.

You're also mentioning billions of light-years of travel, yet that it appears instantaneous ("by its own frame of reference") to reach Earth.

All of this are buzzwords. You are incapable so far to successfully explain your theory.

 

[ArgonianVoter]

The first is an assumption, the seconds makes no sense.

You're also mentioning billions of light-years of travel, yet that it appears instantaneous ("by its own frame of reference") to reach Earth.

All of this are buzzwords. You are incapable so far to successfully explain your theory.

as an object's velocity approaches the speed of light, time dilation becomes extreme. For a photon, which travels at the speed of light, time dilation is infinite, meaning no time elapses in its own frame of reference. this isn't part of my theory it's a scientifically proven fact.

 

[ArgonianVoter]

Why would I adopt your theory when the Big Bang and Genesis is all I need to understand things?

it's trying to tie loose ends together from various theories where there are holes in said theories, not replacing existing ones.


it's not that much different from the ER=EPR theory by Juan Maldacena which suggests that every entangled particle pair is connected by a microscopic wormhole, mine merely asserts that all matter is interwoven to a universal cousin in a similiar way and that the mass from the extended particles creates a coriolis whereby the universe is orbiting said cousins.


if true there should be observable trends in half-life decay rates.

If the universe is orbiting its entangled "cousin," as I hypothesized this motion could explain cosmic inflation and dark energy effects.
and Looking for unexpected rotational patterns in large scale cosmic structures could prove it.

 

[Jewthulhu]

the more energy something has the slower it will experience time which should be plausible to be observed through halflives

Ignoring the fact that energy may influence half-life through a number of mechanisms, results have been inconsistent at best.

photons appear frozen in time to us because they have so much greater energy that they do not experience the same coriolis effect that we do

How are you defining "energy?"

we have already observed that particles have cousins (quantum entanglement), I believe our universe is orbitting itself and is not one but two or more instances of its own matter.

So what? The universe is somehow "orbiting" a parallel universe with opposite atomic spin? How are you even reaching the conclusion that our universe is orbiting something?

If the universe is orbiting its entangled "cousin," as I hypothesized this motion could explain cosmic inflation and dark energy effects.

How?

 

[Meriasek]

- "photons appear frozen in time to us"
Explain.

Probably heard about basic quirks about relativity. Photons travel at the speed of light, and you can't "transform into the inertial frame of a photon/anything at the speed of light". Since everything in relativity is, well, relative, you need to perform Lorentz transformations instead of classical coordinate transformations, and they have a term in them that diverges when the frame speed approaches the speed of light. Time dilation and length contraction are the two most known phenomena associated with this, and those basically explode because they divide by zero if the frame speed is c. Mathematically not quite sound, but you could say time dilation and length contraction become basically infinite, so in the rest frame of a photon, there'd be no time passing per se.

The rest is kinda rambly pieced together from pop sci stuff.
The whole quantum entanglement bit is just outright nonsense and would only work if you already had a feasible quantum gravity theory, which kinda defeats the whole purpose of this. It's a schizophrenic mess, I love these type of crackpot theories. Zero math, zero knowledge, but revolutionised physics into a TOE.

My personal pet theory is that there is an antimatter universe expanding backwards in time from the Big Bang in a cosmologically scaled virtual pair that will collapse unto themselves within a certain time frame, kind of like a higher dimensional Planck scale. Infinite universes are expanding and annihilating constantly just like virtual particles exist and annihilate in quantum electrodynamics. The virtual particles in QED are universes like ours each and every time. As long as it's all a net zero of energy. Reality is an illusion that exists within a quantum of time.
Ok not really, but I do like the theory that the lack of antimatter sections in this universe is due to an antimatter universe expanding from the Big Bang backwards in time. It's called CPT-symmetry, not my idea.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08928

Bonus points for the guy being called "Turok".

 

[Otterly]

You're also mentioning billions of light-years of travel, yet that it appears instantaneous ("by its own frame of reference") to reach Earth.

If you think of space and time as two x and y axes. Photons go at maximum speed through space so they experience zero time and slower shit experiences both. Or something. Not a physicist clearly. But the faster you go the less time you experience. Isn’t that how it works for Bob and Alice?

 

[Meriasek]

If you think of space and time as two x and y axes. Photons go at maximum speed through space so they experience zero time and slower shit experiences both. Or something. Not a physicist clearly. But the faster you go the less time you experience. Isn’t that how it works for Bob and Alice?

Yes, kinda. In relativity, time is dependent on the frame of the observer. If you're on Earth and see a spaceship travelling at very high speeds, you'd observe time passing slower on the ship. Of course, the people on the ship don't notice anything, for them their own clocks run at perfectly normal speed. Since it's all relative, though, they observe the clocks on *Earth* running slow. It's all symmetric, so it's a bit weird how something like the Twin Paradoxon could work, where one twin clearly experiences more subjective time, but that's usually explained by one of the twins *changing* inertial frames to turn around at one point, which is acceleration and thus not being in a pure inertial frame anymore.
Either way, the faster something is, the slower the observed time in that frame is. In the moving frame they also observe distances to be shorter. So if something gets closer and closer to the speed of light (from an external frame of reference), you'd see time slowing down. This is a core plot point of the classic novel Tau Zero by Poul Anderson, btw., where a Bussard ramjet powered spaceship has a malfunction and the drive doesn't stop accelerating, and in the end the ship is so close to c that they see galaxies zipping by and the universe ending despite never actually reaching c. The factor Tau = sqrt(1-v²/c²) goes towards zero the closer you get to c, and since the time dilation is expressed as t' = t/Tau (and length contraction as l' = l*Tau), time becomes infinitely large and distances infinitesimally short. At the speed of light you'd be everywhere at once, there's no time and no distance. But it's also a division by 0, and by the basic postulate that the speed of light is unreachable, you just can't go at c. The rest mass of the object also grows infinitely large, so you'd need an infinite amount of energy to accelerate to c. Photons don't have a rest mass, so it's fine for them.
It's all a bit unintuitive because you have to always consider frames of reference and the differences between them. Two frames of reference measure time and length differently.
If you had a drive that could somehow jump you three light years at the speed of light, the people on the ship would perceive their journey to Alpha Centauri as instantaneous, while the people on Earth would have to wait three years to see them arrive. Well, six, until messages would come back...

 

[We Are The Witches]

Yes, kinda. In relativity, time is dependent on the frame of the observer. If you're on Earth and see a spaceship travelling at very high speeds, you'd observe time passing slower on the ship. Of course, the people on the ship don't notice anything, for them their own clocks run at perfectly normal speed. Since it's all relative, though, they observe the clocks on *Earth* running slow.

No one on the Internet explains this properly, ever.

Why would the ones on the ship experience time "slower"? If you observe the ship traveling for 2 seconds across the horizon, the ones on the ship observe the distance traveled through the window, also for 2 seconds.

The first ones would see the ship going from the left of the horizon to the right, let's say by the time they do a single finger-snap; then the ones on the ship would see the the blurry/in motion Earth's texture or terrain being traveled across, also by the time they perform a single finger-snap.

You traveling at light speed for 1 year, would see through the front window (assuming your retinas are not burned) the space/"Windows-lock-screen" for also 1 year. Assuming your brain is working in a "natural state", so not overly excited, like when someone has an adrenaline/etc increase & may experience the environment slightly in slow-motion. So for 1 second, you'd see 1 second of traveled distance.

 

[Meriasek]

No one on the Internet explains this properly, ever.

Why would the ones on the ship experience time "slower"? If you observe the ship traveling for 2 seconds across the horizon, the ones on the ship observe the distance traveled through the window, also for 2 seconds.

The first ones would see the ship going from the left of the horizon to the right, let's say by the time they do a single finger-snap; then the ones on the ship would see the the blurry/in motion Earth's texture or terrain being traveled across, also by the time they perform a single finger-snap.

You traveling at light speed for 1 year, would see through the front window (assuming your retinas are not burned) the space/"Windows-lock-screen" for also 1 year. Assuming your brain is working in a "natural state", so not overly excited, like when someone has an adrenaline/etc increase & may experience the environment slightly in slow-motion. So for 1 second, you'd see 1 second of traveled distance.

The ones on the ship don't experience time slower. They look at their clocks and will say, "Yeah, one second is still one second. It's still exactly 9.192.631.770 times the period of a hyperfine transition of Cs133". In every inertial frame everyone will look at their clocks and feel each second being the exact same length, and can measure it to be exactly as it should.
But take a ship with a big-ass digital clock printed on the side, and it's going by really fast. People on Earth will see *that clock* ticking slower. If you could somehow measure the hyperfine oscillations of Cs133 on that ship from Earth, you'd find that it takes much longer than one second for those 9.192.631.770 oscillations to occur.
A classic demonstration is the Einstein clock: Define a clock as two parallel mirrors with a laser pulse bouncing between them. Make them 30 cm apart, and it'll take the light about 1 ns to go from one mirror to the other. If you're standing still next to this kind of clock, you'll find that the distance of the light travelling is always 30 cm. Now if you saw that mirror arrangement going by at very high speed, the light would still bounce between the mirrors, but instead of a straight line, the light would go diagonally between the mirrors. But light travels at the exact same speed in every inertial frame, and you'd still measure the light to go exactly at c even from your own inertial frame, so the time between bounces is more than 1 ns *in your frame of reference*. It travels a longer distance *in your frame of reference*.

And yes, the ones on the spaceship would also see the clocks on Earth ticking slower in the exact same way, since all inertial frames are equal. It'd be all symmetric if the inertial frames never changed. The Twin Paradoxon comes from changing inertial frames (i.e. the one twin having to accelerate/change inertial frames to return).

If you travelled *at* the speed of light you'd see no distance travelled at all, since length contraction would *at c* would contract all distances to 0, but time dilation would be infinite. It's just kinda nonsensical from a mathematical point of view. The basic postulate is that light moves at c in every frame of reference equally no matter the relative speeds. If the relative speed was c, it would make no sense anymore. The Lorentz transformations reflect that.
I know I earlier made it seem like it would work somehow, but it doesn't. Disregard that in my last post. I was never good at relativity, I went into a different direction.

 

[cigint]

This is just a mishmash of science nuggets like "photons appear frozen in time" from incorrectly understood Youtube shorts, tied together with infalsifiable imaginations that are not at all necessary to explain the phenomena which the user discusses but does not grasp. The use of the word "centerfold" as if it's some kind of scientific or geometric term suggests a drugged-out schizophrenic or niggerbrain swimming in a toxic sludge of Reddit euphoria.

 

[A Log]

Damn, is it real schizo hour already?

 

[Rei is Shit.]

Its a hyper-dimensional fractal donut. Source: a dream.

 

[cigint]

If you're on Earth and see a spaceship travelling at very high speeds, you'd observe time passing slower on the ship.

No one on the Internet explains this properly, ever. Why would the ones on the ship experience time "slower"?

You outside the ship observe time passing more slowly on the ship. The people inside the ship don't observe time passing more slowly for themselves.

 

[Meriasek]

You outside the ship observe time passing more slowly on the ship. The people inside the ship don't observe time passing more slowly for themselves.

That's the thing about relativity, it's rather counterintuitive to our regular perception where we tend to feel like there's a universal, central frame of reference. But everything is always dependent on said frames of references, and there isn't a universal frame that is somehow more valid than others. Add in that the speed of light is always c, no matter the frame of reference, and you get those weird effects.