Culture My unexpected Pride icon: Pokémon, small fluffy monsters battling in a gender-fluid world - Pikachu is now a queer icon

My unexpected Pride icon: Pokémon, small fluffy monsters battling in a gender-fluid world​

IMG_2343.webp
Pikachu costumes are a popular choice at Pride parades.Composite: Guardian Design; PR
As a queer child in the early 2000s, I never fitted in with the hyper-masculine world of Action Man. But in the gender-nonconforming Pokémon universe, I found safety

Jordan Page
Sat 14 Jun 2025 08.00 EDT
Woolworths, Woking, Surrey. I’d walk up to the till, place my Barbie or Britney Spears CD player on the counter, and before the cashier had the chance to ask if we wanted a bag, I’d blurt out: “This is a present for my sister, it’s not for me!” Sharing a smirk with my mum, they’d offer replies such as, “Wow, she’ll love it!” and “Aren’t you a kind brother?” (If you hadn’t already guessed, I do not have a sister.)


This was a regular occurrence in my childhood in the early 2000s. I was acutely aware, even as early as the age of five or six, that these were not the usual toys a little boy should be playing with. Where was my Action Man or Scalextric track? Why were my bedroom walls covered in posters of pop stars wearing crop tops and not footballers with muddy knees?

Barbie and Britney may have been my secret vices, but there was another phenomenon I, and a lot of other children my age, quickly became wrapped up in: Pokémon. The Japanese media franchise – currently the highest-grossing in the world – reached its “Pokémania” peak around this time.

Video games, trading cards, figurines, and an anime TV series – the Pokémon universe had them all. I was obsessed. My parents were left dumbfounded when I could name all the original 151 species by heart, and less than happy when I drew a huge pokéball on my bedroom wall in crayon.

IMG_2344.webp
Jordan Page in Pikachu costume. Photograph: Courtesy of Jordan Page
As a queer child, I could love Pokémon freely. Unlike other children’s media and toys of the time it wasn’t strictly gendered. While my badge maker and Polly Pockets were clearly marketed towards girls (and my short-lived possession of them was mixed with shame), nobody had a problem with my love of Pokémon, because anyone could be a Pokémon trainer, and for a while everyone wanted to be one.

There were singing, dancing Pokémon that were fluffy and cute, and that – shock! – I was drawn to. Nobody cared which one was your favourite, because everyone had the same goal: to become the ultimate Pokémon master. Looking back, in what was incredibly ahead of its time, there were gender-neutral and gender non-conforming Pokémon. There was even one slightly resembling a drag queen.

The human villains in the original TV show, Jessie and James of Team Rocket, regularly dressed in clothes associated with the opposite sex and subverted gender roles, and this never attracted the kind of frivolous concern about “confusing” children that it would today. Longtime Pokémon fans have debated their queerness in online forums, even if queerness is never mentioned in the show. For that matter, aside from the odd crush, heterosexual relationships weren’t central to the show’s storylines, either.

IMG_2345.webp
Team Rocket … Jessie and James (left), carrying his trademark rose. Photograph: Everett Collection Inc/Alamy
Pokémon “battled”, but it was hardly violent enough to make me squirm or put me off in the way that hyper-masculine, weapon-wielding characters from other TV series and video games did. I felt excluded for not liking shows with these attributes, but in the Pokémon universe, I fitted in.

In 2016, the augmented reality game Pokémon Go catapulted the franchise back into public consciousness. By the end of the year, it had been downloaded more than 500m times. A community of LGBTQ+ fans – whether teenagers fresh to the franchise or adults who grew up with the original series – formed, and now it’s common to see Pikachu at Pride or get-ups resembling Ash Ketchum (the show’s original protagonist) in drag bars. The franchise has since embraced this community, introducing more visibly gender-fluid human characters.

Though my relationship with Pokémon remains firmly in the early 2000s, I’m grateful that it provided me with a world free of gender norms that I didn’t relate to, a world that shielded me from being judged for what I really liked.

Feeling a pang of nostalgia as I began writing this, I searched for the soundtrack of the first Pokémon movie on YouTube, only to discover that none other than a teenage Britney Spears sings a song on it. It’s made for children and it’s called Soda Pop, so obviously it’s awful. But if anything, discovering it is a full-circle moment for me, and in my mind, cements the fact that Pokémon has a place in queer culture through and through.

Link (Archive)
 
It really is just preying on autistics to fulfill a sexual kink isn't it?
It's a relationship most autistic fans are completely comfortable with.

Autistic people confuse corporations. They're incredibly easy to market to, but doing so haphazardly scares away the dang dirty neurortypicals. Nintendo used to be masters of walking that fine line, until the lunatics took over the asylum.
 
>children's cartoon about 10 year olds enslaving super powered animals and forcing them into pit fights

Mentally stunted faggot: omg that's totally gay just like me
Actually it's worse than that. It's repeatedly stated and shown that Pokemon LOVE to fight and don't have to be forced to do it. And owners who won't let their Pokemon fight and treat them like pampered pets are vilified and treated like animal abusers and their Pokemon shown to be clinically depressed from having to repress their nature and constantly try and run away...
 
Are we still trying to cope-splain away Nintendo franchise developers actively going out of their way to write not just one, not just two, not just three but several interspecies rape stories? In a game mostly played by kids?
If you look at the deep lore in the leaks that was never actually made public, they had a whole plan on how to build this setting going forward, not some random one-off folklore that can easily be overlooked
View attachment 7510601
Take a look at this, the only way you will ever see this circle is if you got an event Arceus all the way back(or hacked the game today) and got a special event in Heartgold/Soulsilver. Nobody knew what autistic deep lore was behind it until the leaks. If they included something like this, what makes you think those folklore stories weren't supposed to play a larger point in the setting that was never(thankfully) fleshed out?
Somebody clearly had a vision, and that vision involved a lot of rape. Nobody put a gun to their head and forced them to write this, there is so many ways to make a same point without explicitly making them sexualized(which is exactly what the final Diamond and Pearl games went with, and even there it strongly implies bestiality and marriage between Pokemon and people in the ancient times. This was just a bad idea to include all around.)
Going to needs some context as I don't know what that image is, what event you are talking about, let alone what the fuck you mean about Pokemon having beastiality and a planned lore....
 
Actually it's worse than that. It's repeatedly stated and shown that Pokemon LOVE to fight and don't have to be forced to do it. And owners who won't let their Pokemon fight and treat them like pampered pets are vilified and treated like animal abusers and their Pokemon shown to be clinically depressed from having to repress their nature and constantly try and run away...
Everything I learn about the Pokemon world just reinforces my belief that it's actually some kind of dystopian hell hole.
 
Are we still trying to cope-splain away Nintendo franchise developers actively going out of their way to write not just one, not just two, not just three but several interspecies rape stories? In a game mostly played by kids?
Pokémon is not just for kids. Its for manchildren too.
 
I find it funny how so many transgender people attach themselves to Pokemon when most Pokemon are strictly male or female, and there is an entire game mechanic called “breeding” which only allows male and female Pokemon to mate with each other.
 
Somebody clearly had a vision, and that vision involved a lot of rape. Nobody put a gun to their head and forced them to write this, there is so many ways to make a same point without explicitly making them sexualized(which is exactly what the final Diamond and Pearl games went with, and even there it strongly implies bestiality and marriage between Pokemon and people in the ancient times. This was just a bad idea to include all around.)

The humans and pokemon married part is because in-world humans ARE essentially pokemon too. The creator/god of their world created everything. It's not even clear if humans were anything like the humans we see in the world today. Humans simply evolved over time from normal pokemon, like real world humans and animals. The distinction is conceptual, not literal. The other difference is that unlike animals, all pokemon are human level smart and can talk as detailedly and complexedly as humans, across species in fact.. Humans are now the only ones not able to understand them. Outside of special cases like human language talking pokemon, psychic types and other special ones. Pokemon are not animals in-story.. Or that's to say that "animals" in the pokemon world are really about as smart as humans. It's like an alien scenario.. Only there , not only are they not the same species, they aren't even related as a lifeform. but they are intelligent as us. Fucking an Asari is technically even worse by these standers. Of course i'm talking about the pokemon past here, when they could communicate etc.

That lore was more about trying to explain how a very short time ago, humans could still communicate with pokemon and largely saw themselves as the same/equals. When one factors in that in their world reproduction compatibility isn't based on species but a small number, a handful really, of egg groups/classes, for literally thousands or tens of thousands, and maybe even more, different species... It makes it pretty much inevitable that such things took place. (I mean there is a "humanoid" egg group)

As for the rape stuff.. That is all cultural "lore" unthinkingly worked in, just as every culture does with their media. Everything i've heard and seen about it, bases it in old cultural myths and stories. Don't throw stones man.. a lot of our own western folklore and even children's stories/songs etc.. are pretty dark and fucked up!

Most importantly... much of this lore and ideas were written decades before troonism or letter people were a cultural thing. Please don't try to tin-foil this into something deeper.. We already have enough SJ nonsense in the modern pokemon franchise right now.


But who cares? Little boys can like Britney Spears, and play with Barbies. Most little boys don’t after 5-6 but who cares? Play with what you want to. I liked Lego, and had many a scalextric battle with my brothers on our second hand track. I’m a girl, the toys I liked were indicative of my PERSONALITY not my sex. I disn’t like dolls or makeup very much, I preferred construction toys. Kids generally like a specific ‘schema’ to play (role play toys, toys that allow movement, or building, or drawing etc.) it’s the action of the toy that is what kids tend to gravitate towards.
You’re a boy. You remain a boy whether you like action man or Barbie. Stop retconning your childhood to say you’ve always been gay. Kids don’t have a sexuality, they just like ‘stuff.’ Like toys, or music.
It’s so fucking depressing.
1978: girls and boys love Lego! The toy that lets them build whatever they like and express their imaginative and creative side!
2025: your daughter likes the lego blacktron revival, so she’s a boy we need to spay and neuter her and cut her tits off

Exactly.. These morons have went full circle and back to sex/gender essentialists. Which is surprising as it is scary since they still use that term/concept as a pejorative. Hell in the 00s, you would be attacked aggressively for even suggesting some of what TRAs cancel people for disagreeing with.
 
Last edited:
Did you ever notice that anyone over the age of 18 that is into Sonic and/or Pokémon are creepy?
 
Back