Science Myocarditis after Covid vaccination: Research on possible long-term risks underway - "Both Pfizer and Moderna are launching clinical trials to track health issues — if any — in the years following a diagnosis of vaccine-associated heart problems in teens and young adults."

NBC News:

Both Pfizer and Moderna are launching clinical trials to track health issues — if any — in the years following a diagnosis of vaccine-associated heart problems in teens and young adults.

In October 2021, Da’Vion Miller was found unconscious in the bathroom of his home in Detroit a week after receiving his first dose of Pfizer's Covid vaccine.

He had known something was wrong: Then 22, he had started experiencing chest pain two days after getting vaccinated, followed by fatigue, shortness of breath and dizziness.

Miller was rushed to Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital, where he was diagnosed with myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, an inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. His doctor advised him not to receive a second dose of either the Pfizer or the Moderna vaccines.

“I was like, that’s crazy,” Miller said, noting that he knows the heart inflammation condition following vaccination is extremely rare.

Miller is one of a very small group of people in the United States who have experienced myocarditis following vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech or the Moderna Covid vaccines based on mRNA technology.

Myocarditis is a condition that has long been linked to a number of viral infections, including influenza, coxsackieviruses, as well as Covid. It has also been observed as an infrequent but worrisome side effect of the mRNA Covid vaccines.

Are there long-term risks of myocarditis?

Of the hundreds of millions of Covid vaccine doses given in the U.S. since late 2020, there have been around 1,000 reports of vaccine-related myocarditis or pericarditis in children under age 18, primarily young males, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most of those who developed the condition have fully recovered, although research so far has only looked at how well they're doing after several months. Some doctors wonder if it can cause permanent damage to the heart.

Now, the first research in the U.S. is underway, tracking adverse health effects — if any — that may appear in the years following a diagnosis of vaccine-associated heart problems. Moderna has already launched two trials, the most recent in September. Pfizer confirmed that at least one of its trials, which will include up to 500 teens and young adults under age 21, is slated to begin in the next couple of months.

The Food and Drug Administration has required that the drugmakers conduct several studies assessing the potential long-term impacts of myocarditis, as part of its approval of the mRNA Covid vaccines in the U.S. Early findings from the research could be published as early as next year, sources told NBC News.

Some of the trials will follow those who developed the condition for as long as five years, according to the FDA’s approval letters. The trials will be monitoring for myocarditis and subclinical myocarditis, which doesn't cause symptoms.

The FDA declined to comment on Pfizer's and Moderna's studies because they are ongoing, but an agency official said the chance of having myocarditis occur following vaccination is "very low."

The condition does not lead to cardiac-related death, the official said, as claimed by Florida's surgeon general last month who cited an unpublished analysis of state data.

"There is no evidence of increased risk of deaths following mRNA vaccines compared to individuals who did not get vaccinated," the official said. "In fact, evidence from well-conducted, peer-reviewed, published studies suggests that the risk of death is higher for unvaccinated individuals for nearly every age group."

What is known about myocarditis and vaccines?​

The vast majority of cases occur in young men, ages 16 to 24, according to the CDC. The agency did not have data available on the total number of cases in young adults 24 and younger, but it estimates there have been 52.4 cases and 56.3 cases per million doses of Pfizer's and Moderna's vaccines, respectively.

Symptoms of myocarditis include:

  • Chest pain
  • Shortness of breath
  • Feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering or pounding heart
A study by Canadian researchers published Monday in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology found that men younger than 40 who got the Moderna vaccine had the highest risk of heart issues, usually within 21 days after the second dose. The study was observational, meaning it doesn’t prove cause and effect but it is one of only a few studies to compare the risk of myocarditis between the Pfizer and the Moderna vaccines.

Last month, Kaiser Permanente scientists found that incidences of myocarditis following a booster dose of either the Pfizer or the Moderna vaccine were higher than after the first dose, but still lower than after the second.

There has not been a similar reporting pattern observed after receiving the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. Novavax has said no heart inflammation concerns were raised during clinical trials of its vaccine.

Vaccine-associated myocarditis is usually milder than the viral type and most people with the condition make a full recovery, said Dr. Nicola Klein, a vaccine expert at Kaiser Permanente.

In some cases, people who’ve developed myocarditis after a viral infection can suffer scarring along the heart’s tissue, reducing its ability to pump blood and circulate oxygen around the body, said Dr. Leslie Cooper, the chair of the department of cardiology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Cooper joined an expert advisory panel formed by Moderna to monitor its Covid vaccine safety.

It’s unknown how many people with vaccine-associated myocarditis will experience this scarring, he said, noting that about 20% of people with myocarditis linked to viruses go on to experience heart failure.

“It could be 2%. It could be 0%. It could be 20%,” he said, referring to the percentage of people with vaccine-associated myocarditis who could experience long-term heart consequences. “We don’t know the answer.”

The CDC recently published a study in The Lancet that looked at health outcomes in more than 500 teens and young adults at least 90 days after the onset of myocarditis following an mRNA vaccination.

Most got better at least three months after symptoms. Other findings from the CDC report included:

  • About a quarter of the patients in the study were prescribed daily medication related to myocarditis at their last health care provider follow-up.
  • A little more than 100 of the patients had not been cleared for physical activity.
  • In addition, 81 patients had an abnormality on their cardiac MRI — although that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are at risk for any adverse health problems.
The CDC will follow the patients who had not fully recovered for 12 months, said Ian Kracalik, the study’s lead author and CDC epidemiologist.


Are some patients at higher risk for heart issues, such as arrhythmias? Dr. Dongngan Truong, a pediatrician at the University of Utah Health, said Pfizer researchers will be trying to determine the factors.

Pfizer, in collaboration with the Pediatric Heart Network, will be monitoring participants for five years, according to Truong, a co-lead on the Pfizer study. The Pfizer study will include people who were previously hospitalized with vaccine-associated myocarditis, and it will also follow those who were more recently diagnosed.

The team will also compare the patients to a subset of patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, also known as MIS-C, which is associated with a Covid infection.

Truong said that monitoring what happens to younger people and children after Covid infections is “especially important” to get a clearer understanding of the risks of the illness, compared to any possible side effects of the vaccines.

The Pfizer study, which will take place in the U.S. and Canada, has not begun enrollment yet, although the research team has already identified more than 250 patients with myocarditis, she said.

The first findings could be released sometime next year, Truong said.

Scientists still don’t have a clear explanation yet for why the vaccines cause the condition, according to Dr. Paul Burton, Moderna's chief medical officer. He expects the virus’s spike protein, once produced in the cell after vaccination, may generate a reaction in the body that can cause inflammation in the heart.

“We don’t understand yet and there’s no good mechanism to explain it,” he said.

The two myocarditis studies Moderna has started, one of which is in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology, are using public and private data of tens of millions of people who received the company’s vaccine and how they fared, Burton said.

“Did they get myocarditis? When did it occur? How was it treated? How severe was it?” he said.

Moderna is also conducting two additional studies with the European Medicines Agency that will span five different countries. The drugmaker will assess outcomes for a year or more, Burton said, with data expected to be made public around next summer.

He said he doesn’t expect “big surprises.”

In recent weeks, multiple new versions of the omicron variant, including BQ.1 and BQ.1.1, have begun circulating widely in the U.S., increasing the risk of reinfections, particularly for those who haven't yet received a booster dose.

“The emerging new variants that we see on the landscape are very, very infectious, and really have a high risk,” Burton said. “The benefit ratio of getting vaccinated outweighs the risks of getting vaccinated. And that is absolutely true for myocarditis.”

Klein, of Kaiser Permanente, agreed, saying the overall risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis is “very low.”

A year later, Miller is still experiencing symptoms, including chest pain. While there is comfort in knowing his situation is rare, he said, he’s been in and out of the hospital since his diagnosis, which he said has been difficult for him.

“It’s been a scary experience,” he said.

Archive
 
Ah yes - a study by the same big pharma corporations who unironically said

"These vaccines provide 100% immunity and vaccinated people are so impervious to COVID-19 they do not need masks, they do not need to quarantine, they cannot have COVID-19, and cannot spread COVID-19".

Holy fuck the media is dogshit.

(See also - Marlboro release study that cigarettes do not cause cancer in any way and instead actually make you more handsome!)
TBF to Marlboro, cigarettes DO make people look more sophisticated. Clot shots don't even make people cooler.

 
I was like, that’s crazy,” Miller said, noting that he knows the heart inflammation condition following vaccination is extremely rare.
Was. It was rare. Now it’s not.
And this is why you do clinical trials. This should have been known and it WOULD have been known if the trials had been designed and executed properly. Proper design and run for longer. Even a six months longer period with proper follow ups should have been done. The regulatory authorities who approved this stuff without that data are as culpable as all the others.
The paediatric trial, was approved DESPITE them actively acknowledging that it was too small a patient number to have the power to pick that up. I work partly with trials - I have never once seen a trial get approved in such a situation, as in not even given approval to go ahead with the trial never mind approval of the compound. You’re looking at a situation which was basically:
>hi yeah so we want to get approval for children
>ok but there’s talk of heart damage, so that needs to be an endpoint, you need to show that doesn’t happen
>ah no our trial is too small can we do it anyway?
>yeah whatever, approved!
Regulatory capture in action.
 
Something that's not emphasised enough in the debate surrounding the risk of developing myocarditis from the so-called vaccine vs. the risk from contracting COVID, is that no-one is forcing anyone to get COVID, but they are/were mandating vaccination. I appreciate that I'm preaching to the converted here, but there seems to be an implicit assumption underlying the discourse surrounding COVID (and many other health issues) in general that doing nothing makes the government just as culpable as forcing treatment upon people, and I'd like to see it attacked much more vigorously.
 
Man who knew being a hysteric faggot that decided the ABSOLUTE highest form of emergency powers divested upon them without even trying any other fucking alternatives (because political reasons, of course) would create a rushed and panicked response.

Who also knew that said panic would be exploited by corporations and the naive fucks getting drunk off the emergency kool-aid were literally too retarded to realize that said measures are emergency FOR A FUCKING REASON while somehow being so retarded that they thought wearing a FUCKING SOCK on your head would work especially if you wear two (wait was it that overlapping protection helps or that it doesn't not help).

Man it would've been wild if someone, anyone could've known and they most assuredly would not have been ostracized by said people high on kool-aid creating an illusion there was absolutely no pushback against their methods. While a bunch of simpering retards pretended that said half-assed - and totally not at all exploited by corporations for money, response was a totally effective means of responding to a threat that they literally ignored and then overreacted to within FUCKING DAYS.

If only we had a period of time afterwards to see just how serious the virus was in comparison to how easily said retards would give up their powers and not exploit it by naming asinine bullshit "national health emergencies" like some dumbass 4 year old that figured out how power words worked.
 
Remember when it was a conspiracy theory the covid 'vaccines' had bad side effects and you should trust the science? Pepperidge farms remembers. I'm sure they will have myocarditis 'vaccines' out soon that are totally save however.
 
If I recall, the issue is primarily in the spike protein, not in whether it is mRNA or not.
Aye. COVID itself can cause cardiovascular dysfunction.

In light of that, I guess it makes sense that the vaccine could cause it, too. But I don't know why its prominent side rare effect is different than the prominent rare side effect of the J&J vaccine.

(I figure nobody involved in making these vaccines has bothered to find out, either.)
For me it was that vaccines for coronaviruses and rhinoviruses have generally not been bothered with for a reason ie. they’ve pretty much never worked.
Well, if you're trying to make a vaccine against rhinoviruses, you're trying to make a vaccine against the common cold.

Not only is the common cold hardly anything worth making a vaccine for, there are hundreds of different viruses that cause the common cold. It'd be like trying to handpick dust out of your carpet.
 
When contacted for an official statement, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla remarked, "LOL." When asked to elaborate, he simply added, "LMAO, even."
Pressed for an explanation, he loudly slapped his forehead and exclaimed, apparently surprised, "Oh! That's right! You're supposed to test for side effects BEFORE releasing product to market!" Then giggled, "I'm such a scatterbrain. Can never find my yacht keys in the morning. Fucking nightmare."
 
And the emergency use authorization persists despite the fact that
  • it's no longer an emergency
  • they now offer drugs to treat covid
The second part is even a qualifying part of the emergency use authorization IIRC - there must be no approved alternative treatment available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bungdit Din
This is my first time speaking my opinion about this vaccines.

Currently not vaccinated with the covid cocktail. Why? A temporary business partner had it, and a week later or so, he had a stroke, thankfully, he survived, atbthe cost of his motor functions. And I've been hearing people who took the jab on the news, and they were dropping dead thanks to a stroke or a heart attack.

I thought it was still a coincidence, so I did some research by asking around. So while I was getting a haircut, I asked the hairstylist if she was jabbed. Yes, she took the jab. Pfizer. And after she took it she had heart palpitations.

After that, I vowed not to take it, fuck that shit. This is more of instinct for life preservation than being a conspiratoid or some shit. Nobody should take sketchy medicines. And everyone is right that this should have a testing phase and should have been used to test subjects only. The fact that it was rushed to the whole population, and you can't sue if something happens is already sketchy enough, in a fair and perfect world this would be lambasted.

Anyone who dismisses this as a conspiracy doesn't think for themselves or doesn't care about their lives. Meanwhile I probably got the coof recently, since I had a really persistent cold and fever and it was really virulent. More persistent, lasted around weeks and spreads faster than the flu, so I believe that was most lilely, covid. Still living fine.

I'd say those who still zealously push for this nonsensically and took the jab willingly deserve the strokes, and if they did not get one, they deserve to eat pure cholesterol until they croak. You all are getting swept by (un)natural selection.

Ps. Not an antivaxxer. I'd take a tried and tested vax for hepatitis, anti tetanus and stuff but not this shitty jab. I might as well take a heroin needle full of bloodborne bugs if I'm going to take the covid cocktail.
 
Now, the first research in the U.S. is underway, tracking adverse health effects — if any — that may appear in the years following a diagnosis of vaccine-associated heart problems. Moderna has already launched two trials, the most recent in September. Pfizer confirmed that at least one of its trials, which will include up to 500 teens and young adults under age 21, is slated to begin in the next couple of months.
Pfizer, in collaboration with the Pediatric Heart Network, will be monitoring participants for five years, according to Truong, a co-lead on the Pfizer study. The Pfizer study will include people who were previously hospitalized with vaccine-associated myocarditis, and it will also follow those who were more recently diagnosed.

Looks like they're still going by the playbook:

"The Spars Pandemic Scenario 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communications"
2017 - John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health | Center for Health Security

ACKNOWLEDGING LOSS CHAPTER EIGHTEEN
At the request of HHS Secretary Nagel, ASPR convened a series of meetings among senior leadership of the federal health agencies to address policy and program changes being implemented as a result of a departmental review of the response to the SPARS pandemic. Among the issues considered were the implications of growing negative public opinion regarding Corovax and the government’s perceived indifference to victims of the public health response to SPARS. One senior health official argued that time and a robust medical monitoring program for vaccine recipients—the components of which were already in place—should be sufficient to determine whether public concern about long-term effects was, in fact, warranted: “We have to wait for the data. People need to understand that fact.”
Seems like they really want to monitor a network of people...for health. An "internet of bodies" for valid medical research, if you will.
 
Back