Mystery Woman's Story - You dare question the King's indefatigable loyalty to his GF???

[wilji1090]

He paid, he paid in full, and he paid before the proposed date. She just panicked because he blocked her twitter, when she was the one who was an escort, with links in her profile, with posts on her account lining up with his posts making it evident what was going on. Eye rolling cringy stupid stuff for her to do. Its supposed to be hush hush but you have a girl who keeps messaging you and replying to your posts on twitter who has a back log of posts detailing they went away the same time as you met your girlfriend. Its autistic what she did. Complete dumb ass.

Anybody would of done what Phil did. She was being an idiot.

I dunno about you, but if I were in Phil's position I'd have made sure I could pay for services rendered up front before even acquiring the services of an escort.

 

[PhilCosby]

My site didnt say it at first either, most don't I suggest book a date and the NDA will come into play, if there is no NDA / Companionship agreement no client will even book the escort since then you have no guarantee as client that your private info such as address, phone nr, id etc goes public thats why pretty much every escort is forced to work with one. The NDA comes into play as soon as they push through for the set date. I'm sure there are Escorts that work without one that are not part of an escort network but what client in his or her right mind would book such an escort with no privacy guarantee whatsoever? Specially since a lot of clients are either married, have a girlfriend or are respectable business men or even both.

So what you are saying is that private info is in the NDA. Well that isn't much of an issue for Phil because 90% of his private info is public.

Phone Number - Check
Home Address - Check
Annual Income - Check
Immediate Family - Check
Work History - Check

We have everything except his Social and Credit Score at this point. So my question to you is two fold.

1. What specifically is in the NDA beyond his basic info that this dumbass already gave us? More specifically, what would be in the NDA that isn't in the booking application for the background check of the client?

2. Is this the only network (PureVIP) that you are signed up with? And if so, how difficult would it be for you to sign up with another in the event of a blacklist?


As for the questions you ask at tge end of your post, I can answer a few as I have partaken in the services of a network girl.

I have no social networking beyond an old MySpace. I stayed away from LinkedIn as I have started my own small business.

The phone numbers I use are either App numbers or something off of a throwaway Cricket phone.

And some of the info I submit is partially falsified. For example, I may put in work history of companies that have gone under but nothing current and put in that I run an eBay business. The only thing I can't falsify is my ID.

I do all if this because I realize that what I am doing is illegal. And if the authorities get a warrant, the network I am dealing with has me on file that they can potentially look at. I want to give as little information as possible.

And I personally haven't gotten a girl that has offered a NDA. That doesn't mean they aren't out there.

 

[Kosher Dill]

what client in his or her right mind would book such an escort with no privacy guarantee whatsoever?

One guy did, but by the time he realized it there was nothing he could do.

 

[BlackBerserker1]

I dunno about you, but if I were in Phil's position I'd have made sure I could pay for services rendered up front before even acquiring the services of an escort.

Id never get an escort, but MW herself said she lets it slip with clients who have had multiple visits and no problems. And thats what Phil had been. She said he had paid up the last 2 times. So she give him leeway. And for whatever reason, ( all though i said why, she was stupidly posting on twtter and he blocked her to hide her ) she decided to put on the heat before the deadline was even up. He paid before the dead line, he didnt try to mess her out of the money. She got the money before the due date. So i dont know what the fuck she is angry about. She trashed her own reputation.

Hey, hire my services, ill sending you positive messages on twitter where if people click my profile will see a detailed journey ive been on to your city and see im an escort but it will be totally anonymous i swear.

 

[wilji1090]

The anger, as has been stated ad nausem throughout the whole of this thread, stems from the fact Phil blocked her before she even began rattling his cage. Part of their contract mandated that he keep in contact with her, which he failed to do by blocking her. Naturally she got pissed off. Can you honestly say you'd be willing to overlook someone cutting off contact with you if they owed you $2000-$3000 dollars? Because if you are, then my friend you should be nominated for sainthood because I'd probably descend into levels of autism that shouldn't be possible if someone owed me that much money and then cut off contact.

 

[Xenomorph]

Why is this so important for people to go on and on and on for several posts trying to disprove shit?

It's an entertaining story, nothing more. Phil is not some public high profile figure where we must know the truth!

Some people believe it, some do not.

We all have our own thoughts which we've shared.

Let it play out and enjoy the ride. No need to go on rants for pages of this thread being condescending because someone doesn't agree with you.

Jeez.

I agree and it's boring at this point.

 

[BLACKPINKPRO]

Did Philly boy acknowledge the new photo today?

 

[Skeletor]

He paid, he paid in full, and he paid before the proposed date.

I think the story is that he missed the deadline and then she started going after him publicly and gave him some extra time to pay up. Which would sort of mean their agreement is null and void, but this ride has never had a consistent plot.

 

[KingjadVCMP]

I think the story is that he missed the deadline and then she started going after him publicly and gave him some extra time to pay up. Which would sort of mean their agreement is null and void, but this ride has never had a consistent plot.

As far as I'm aware of the alleged timeline of events, no deadline was actually missed. An extension was requested, accepted and even signed on.

For me the one huge inconsistency was @MysteryWoman at first laughing about the idea of Phil having a girlfriend, arguing it was a "girlfriend experience". They now seem fairly sure he DOES have a girlfriend, for whatever reason.

For everything else, some things make sense and some things don't so who knows.

 

[Skeletor]

As far as I'm aware of the alleged timeline of events, no deadline was actually missed. An extension was requested, accepted and even signed on.

So why in fuck would she publicly burn him if they both agreed on an extension? There's no way any of this shit makes any sense.

 

[Kona]

So why in fuck would she publicly burn him if they both agreed on an extension? There's no way any of this shit makes any sense.

I believe the reason given was because he blocked her, and she wanted to scare him into unblocking.

 

[harbinger]

So why in fuck would she publicly burn him if they both agreed on an extension? There's no way any of this shit makes any sense.

As far as I can tell from the timeframe of events:
-Phillip did not have the payment to give to the escort up from at the beginning of the visit.
-An agreement was reached that he would pay half up front and half at a later date.
-The twitter account of said escort went live after 6 months of dormancy to like tweets by Phillip right after they parted company. ("My girlfriend is on her way back home, yada yada yada.")
-@GoutSydePhil tweets images of the escort's likes and tweets ("Traveling really sucks, lol.") Kiwifarms is made aware of situation.
-24 hours later, a twitch account with the same name (Kimberlie Brink) is banned from Phillip's Twitch stream
-It is possible, but I have no way of knowing for certain, that the escort's twitter and all other forms of communication with Phillip are broken during this time.
-24 hours after the aforementioned twitch account is banned, MysteryWoman makes initial post on Kiwifarms.
-MysteryWoman starts "rattling the cage" (4 inch, cock, etc).
-at some point later, MysteryWoman claims a new date is set for the payment of the rest of the payment (January 12, 2018 ). (because "eight apostrophe" comes out , god kf can be gay sometimes)
-MysteryWoman claims Phillip paid in full.

Please feel free to correct me if I am misremembering the chain of events or forgetting something here.

My point is, if I remember correctly, the January 12th date was the second agreed-upon date.

 

[Fox]

This is like a show not ending after it hit its peak in ratings. Now we have three more seasons of shit.
This should've ended at "Phil paid me." But instead we got "Phil raped someone oh no wait maybe not I dunno."
rip saga.
At least we have the podcast()

 

[millais]

For me, the most compelling evidence that we weren't rused is that unprecedented 5-minute prestream and the snort-free, super-focused gameplay stream that followed. He was really unnerved that day the scandal broke, in a way that seemed spontaneous and genuine, and it manifested in his remarkably unusual behavior in those two streams

 

[neger psykolog]

For me, the most compelling evidence that we weren't rused is that unprecedented 5-minute prestream and the snort-free, super-focused gameplay stream that followed. He was really unnerved that day the scandal broke, in a way that seemed spontaneous and genuine, and it manifested in his remarkably unusual behavior in those two streams

The power of the snort.

 

[neger psykolog]

As far as I can tell from the timeframe of events:
-Phillip did not have the payment to give to the escort up from at the beginning of the visit.
-An agreement was reached that he would pay half up front and half at a later date.
-The twitter account of said escort went live after 6 months of dormancy to like tweets by Phillip right after they parted company. ("My girlfriend is on her way back home, yada yada yada.")
-@GoutSydePhil tweets images of the escort's likes and tweets ("Traveling really sucks, lol.") Kiwifarms is made aware of situation.
-24 hours later, a twitch account with the same name (Kimberlie Brink) is banned from Phillip's Twitch stream
-It is possible, but I have no way of knowing for certain, that the escort's twitter and all other forms of communication with Phillip are broken during this time.
-24 hours after the aforementioned twitch account is banned, MysteryWoman makes initial post on Kiwifarms.
-MysteryWoman starts "rattling the cage" (4 inch, cock, etc).
-at some point later, MysteryWoman claims a new date is set for the payment of the rest of the payment (January 12, 2018 ). (because "eight apostrophe" comes out , god kf can be gay sometimes)
-MysteryWoman claims Phillip paid in full.

Please feel free to correct me if I am misremembering the chain of events or forgetting something here.

My point is, if I remember correctly, the January 12th date was the second agreed-upon date.

That's how I understand it, basically she has a thing on her site:

 

[neger psykolog]

I think the story is that he missed the deadline and then she started going after him publicly and gave him some extra time to pay up. Which would sort of mean their agreement is null and void, but this ride has never had a consistent plot.

Her blog explains it a bit better:

First 2 weekend visits went great without any problems and he paid nicely upfront and paid for travel expenses. 3rd Visit however which happened in December he asked upon my arrival there if he could pay half upfront and half later at which I said ok since he paid perfectly the first 2 times I didnt see a problem not to trust him same as I do with other clients who also always pay perfectly. However as soon as I got home he called me and asked for an extension on the payment because he had some financial problems again I had no reason not to trust him so I gave him an extension until January 12 2018. However a day later he decided to completely break all contact with me at which alarm bells began to go off for me. I tried to call him, text him, email him and tweet him but he had blocked me off everywhere. So I was correct he tried to screw me over and not Pay me. Now I warned him upfront that I'm a very nice and gentle person but do not try to fuck around with my money! I gues he thought he could anyway.

http://slutkimberlie.escortfiles.com/blog/story-time-and-warning

 

[Bubsy]

Are people still getting worked up over this?

 

[Don Kang]

"... but I can still tell you how big his wang was, what his fetishes are, how he performed in bed, what "extra services" he purchased, who's in his family photos, what the inside of his house looks like, what we did together, what we ate together, how he spends his money, what he said to me on the phone, and who his previous sexual partners are. But that's all I can say, I signed an airtight NDA."

This is the exact issue I have with the current state of this saga. She keeps trying to play both sides, yet doesn't seem to understand how her inconsistencies make her story seem less credible. Mystery Woman has already been doing what people are currently asking for. This whole story is based around nothing but implications and indirect evidence provided by herself, which apparently doesn't violate her precious NDA.

She can give you a detailed analysis of all the shit that went down with the client (which obviously infers where she was located and who she was with, down to his fucking house number); but when pressed for a softball level of indirect confirmation she hides behind that NDA like we just asked for a timestamped picture of Phil's dick in her mouth (and MW if you really do have that please keep it to yourself, we're all good).

This shit shouldn't make any sense to anyone who isn't just listening and believing like a fucking KG or BSV. How the hell can all of that information be okay to disclose, but the receipt for the bagel you ate at the airport would be considered a violation of the NDA? This is ignoring the fact that she already used those tweets about airline travel (both hers and Phil's) as evidence to back up her own story. If indirect evidence of being in the airport on that day would be breaking the NDA, she's already done that herself. That's the exact claim she's personally made. Yet for some reason we're supposed to take this shit at face value for whatever reason and give her more unwarranted attention. Yeah the ride was fun and all, but this is becoming played out now.

How about this MW; If I'm recalling correctly, Phil mentioned his girlfriend had to catch two different planes to either get to the states, or head back home from them (I can't remember which it was). If that was you, like you've implied it is, do you have any information on the connecting flight you took? If the issue is placing you and your client in the same area, showing the connecting flight shouldn't be an issue in terms of the NDA. That would confirm you were in the states on the date you claim, and not in the state of Washington with your client. If not, I've gotta opt out this thread, because it's nothing but attention seeking now.

I know people are going to get pissy because this is a "No Fun Allowed" post, go shit in the street; but since MW plans on keep this story alive, I don't see why we're sitting here eating up unverified claims because of some apparently bulletproof NDA. There's not much further this shit can even go.

 

[Done]

The simplest answer is because @MysteryWoman has already gotten paid, and the only way to preserve Phil's privacy as a paying client is to keep adding inconsistencies to her original story and introduce reasonable doubt.

If you take the core story, and only the core story, then it checks out.