Crime Neighbors in ‘no-crime zone’ area of LA shocked after dad shot dead while walking dog

Terrifying surveillance video captured the moment a Los Angeles man was fatally shot while walking his dog in an area neighbors described as a “no-crime zone.”

Marcos Sandoval and his dog are seen walking near the corner of Genesee Avenue and Saturn Street about 5:30 a.m. Saturday when a car approaches and stops at the intersection, KCAL-TV reported.

The driver gets out of the dark sedan, exchanges words with Sandoval and fires at the victim several times before fleeing northbound on Genesee.

A passerby discovered Sandoval about 6:15 a.m. and called 911.

Sandoval’s dog, Little Torro, is seen in the footage running away after the first shot. The pooch was not injured and made it back home safely, KCAL reported.

“He started barking at my sister’s window, the back door, and my sister went out to look for him,” Sandoval’s daughter, who was not named, told the outlet. “When she couldn’t find him, that’s when she called me.”

A neighbor who heard the gunfire described the sound of two men arguing loudly shortly before the shooting.

“I woke up maybe like 5:30 and heard two men talking loudly, arguing,” she told the outlet on the condition of anonymity, adding that she believed the two men knew each other.

“Then my dog and cat woke up and a few minutes — maybe five minutes — went by, then I heard two gunshots. I didn’t know they were gunshots at the time,” the woman added.

Sandoval’s daughter described her dad as a “good person” who “had no enemies.”

“We don’t know why someone would just target him,” she told KCAL. “He would always put me and my sister first before anyone and it’s just not fair that they just took him away from us like that.”

LAPD Lt. John Radtke said police have not established a motive in the shooting.

“This is a very quiet neighborhood, no significant crime patterns,” he said.

Shocked neighbors described the area as a “no-crime zone.”

“We’ve never had anything like that,” Shirley Dionzon, who has lived in the area since 1965, told the outlet.

Link to the article.
 
in the majority of california, its not hard. its mostly the 5 or so counties that make it bad. like LA and wherever silicon valley is.
It's only hard to legally own a firearm if you have a record (or no record if you're an illegal); but even then the hoops you have to jump through aren't that difficult, just something to make the process more annoying. The actual hard part is getting a Concealed Carry Permit; those things are for politicians, law enforcement, and whoever can make a sizable donation to the County Sherrif's re-election campaign.
 
It's only hard to legally own a firearm if you have a record (or no record if you're an illegal); but even then the hoops you have to jump through aren't that difficult, just something to make the process more annoying. The actual hard part is getting a Concealed Carry Permit; those things are for politicians, law enforcement, and whoever can make a sizable donation to the County Sherrif's re-election campaign.
there's a supreme court decision coming up. if it goes well, it'll ban may issue permit, schemes.
so every state becomes shall issue at minimum. states that are consitutional carry stay constitutional carry, so dont worry about tha.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FlappyBat
there's a supreme court decision coming up. if it goes well, it'll ban may issue permit, schemes.
so every state becomes shall issue at minimum. states that are consitutional carry stay constitutional carry, so dont worry about tha.
God, the seething, reeing, and total lack of coping from gun-grabbers will be absolutely delicious, should that happen.
 
in the majority of california, its not hard. its mostly the 5 or so counties that make it bad. like LA and wherever silicon valley is.
I might be conflating my difficulty getting a CCW with legal ownership when I lived there.
 
there's a supreme court decision coming up. if it goes well, it'll ban may issue permit, schemes.
so every state becomes shall issue at minimum. states that are consitutional carry stay constitutional carry, so dont worry about tha.
Even if the courts decide favorably for permits, I wouldn't be surprised to have fuckery surrounding it; and they definitely won't be willing to have reciprocity agreements with other states, despite plenty of rural communities go back and forth between California, Nevada, and Arizona. I'm hoping for the best, but I can't trust anyone in the state legislature or judicial system.
 
Even if the courts decide favorably for permits, I wouldn't be surprised to have fuckery surrounding it; and they definitely won't be willing to have reciprocity agreements with other states, despite plenty of rural communities go back and forth between California, Nevada, and Arizona. I'm hoping for the best, but I can't trust anyone in the state legislature or judicial system.
some states are already retaliating pre-emptively
hawaii is looking to pass a law that makes you use a tazer before you use a gun
new jersey and new york are trying to expand the number of places considered gun restricted zones.
 
some states are already retaliating pre-emptively
hawaii is looking to pass a law that makes you use a tazer before you use a gun
new jersey and new york are trying to expand the number of places considered gun restricted zones.
I'd only go to Hawaii to visit, or a job that pays me a quarter-million a year; cost of living is too fucking higher there before it was anywhere else. The only time I'd go to New York or New Jersey is as a war criminal; I know the area is pretty much held hostage by NYC and all the retardation that comes from there, but it's enough to make me skip out on it... the same way San Francisco and Los Angeles ruins the rest of California, and I can't blame people who feel the same.
 
some states are already retaliating pre-emptively
hawaii is looking to pass a law that makes you use a tazer before you use a gun
new jersey and new york are trying to expand the number of places considered gun restricted zones.
I still assume that's only going to be totally enforceable on one of the main islands like Honolulu. Really, why isn't Hawaii treated as several different states?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
I still assume that's only going to be totally enforceable on one of the main islands like Honolulu. Really, why isn't Hawaii treated as several different states?
You really want a bunch of hapas to have 10 senators?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Back