- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
I'd suggest he ask them if the lefties who want to censor art in museums are alt-right too, but I expect that'd just get him a ban for "making a bad faith argument".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jeeesus Christ, I never thought I would see the day when people would claim that Fahrenheit 451 is dangerous.Some more from that thread for those too lazy to click the link.
View attachment 382130 View attachment 382131
Also in my experience /lit/ is more about smug contrarianism (like the rest of the site) and more about referencing as estoric texts as possible to seem smart. Be it Evola or some random writing on hexasim. Whatever makes you bigger brain then the others.
Isn't the whole reason things are censored in Fahrenheit 451 is because people want censorship. These people are literally acting out the plot of the book...And that is both sad and infuriating.Jeeesus Christ, I never thought I would see the day when people would claim that Fahrenheit 451 is dangerous.
Like holy shit, they're at this stage where a book basically preaches the dangers of getting rid of books and is considered to be the prime anti-censorship book is something that should be avoided because only those evil alt-righters like it. And they're saying the same for 1984.
Then again those books also highly encourage individualism and the ability to think for yourself, and considering the hive mind REEEsetEra is, it kinda makes sense why they would hate those books. Doesn't make it less disturbing.
Isn't the whole reason things are censored in Fahrenheit 451 is because people want censorship. These people are literally acting out the plot of the book...And that is both sad and infuriating.
They don't even need a script to recite the propaganda. It's been entirely programmed into them.
To follow the book's plot, once Era inevitably collapses, I imagine Nicole and her disciples wandering around in the proverbial forest, reciting things like "trans women are women" and "intent doesn't matter" for the rest of their lives.
What you wrote here is exactly what everyone I have heard bring the book up is talking about - there are obvious parallels between the modern west and a society where instant gratification and comfort are king and anything that challenges you or your world view is subject to censorship. I don't know what Bradbury thinks the book is about or why, but this seems like some sort of word game or pedantry about the word censorship, because it sure looks like censorship is a theme to me.The Fahrenheit 451 world is a world where people chose vapid instant gratification and push away any discomforting, uncomfortable facts. Because, you know, reading books automatically makes you an open-minded thinker.
Well, the problem is that he blames technology for it. Not people, not politics, but portable radios and fast cars. As if hedonism and myopia didn't exist until invention of electricity.What you wrote here is exactly what everyone I have heard bring the book up is talking about - there are obvious parallels between the modern west and a society where instant gratification and comfort are king and anything that challenges you or your world view is subject to censorship. I don't know what Bradbury thinks the book is about or why, but this seems like some sort of word game or pedantry about the word censorship, because it sure looks like censorship is a theme to me.
It's also because they're of the mindset that depiction = endorsement. So it doesn't matter what the books have to say about the negative things they portray, whether they're condemned in the text or not, because they show it. And that's enough for them to be bad.
It's a surprisingly common thought process for a certain kind of SJW.
Hate group, huh?
Considering the profound lack of violence and defamation done by the mass majority of autists in GamerGate versus these idiots, that's pretty rich.
But I'm not surprised. After all, pedophiles, anarchists, political terrorists, and people who advocate anyone white be persecuted and even murdered are lauded as heroes by these imbeciles, so that's par for the course.
Because they speak the same language, albeit one made up of words only they understand, which are gibberish to anyone with any sense.
Hate group, huh?
Considering the profound lack of violence and defamation done by the mass majority of autists in GamerGate versus these idiots, that's pretty rich.
But I'm not surprised. After all, pedophiles, anarchists, political terrorists, and people who advocate anyone white be persecuted and even murdered are lauded as heroes by these imbeciles, so that's par for the course.
Gamergate literally did nothing wrong. That is clear.
i think gaemergtae was a pretty cool guy. eh butthurt people so bad they'll die 50 years from now whining about it on their deathbed. and he never, once, ever afraid of anything.