Some highlights (in my own opinion) from the SCOTUS ruling on the TN child trannyism ban, with my own commentary :

"you can't ignore the courts how dare you, abolish SCOTUS because trannies"

I don't think the framers had any intention with regards to trannyism because at the time the idea would have been laughed off as just too absurd. It would be treated like one of those satirical Greco-Roman plays or something.

What Constitutional provision does SB1 violate? Is this another case where they throw out "due process" not knowing what that phrase means, or, what? (I'm actually inviting other KF users to explain this to me since my brain doesn't work like leftists)

The people insisting that Trump is a threat to Our Democracy™.

His... defense? This nigger isn't
defending anything, he's deciding how things are going to be. That's how courts work. Also the fact that he won't even consider that maybe "the experts" actually "are wrong and they're biased" says a lot about what's going on in this guy's head.

They really do want "medical experts" to be more supreme than the Supreme Court. I bet they'd change their mind if "medical experts" thought trannyism was bullshit (which it is), though.