NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

Normal society generally frowns on snowflakes trying to force their faggoty terminology on others. Literally all I'm saying.
I was led to believe the term "cisgender" originated in psychiatric studies of transgender people to phrase things more elegantly than "non-transgender". Much like "straight" emerged as a more elegant way of saying "not into men" (people didn't believe in lesbians when straight first emerged).
 
You can only use the twitter API to post if you've used a phone number to verify the account. Other than that, it's very easy.

If anyone has a cheap/free method to provision a disposable number without going all out and buying a prepaid SIM card feel free to send me a PM.

this still makes me mad; I made some legacy accounts in 2015 that still function but I'm very frustrated that I can't make more & there's banners on all of them saying "we had trouble reaching your emails, wanna put your phone number on the account and verify yourself?' and people can filter off unverified accounts now in their settings. I'm down to 5 working accounts.
 
True, but the definitions used socially don't really line up with how they're used scientifically, particularly in chemistry. The only relation the two have is its something to differentiate one thing from another. I was under the impression that in troon speak, trans was rooted in transforming, and cis was supposed to be an anagram for "comfortable in skin." I assume that after the term trans had caught on by the mid 90s, someone noticed in their science class that cis was opposite of trans, and in giving cis a cute new meaning, it gives us a way to stop calling people not like us "normal." It's all a bunch of language gymnastics to normalize their cause to a country that otherwise doesn't really care one way or the other.

View attachment 589822
Cis is not an acronym for comfortable in skin that happened to coincide with the Latin term that is literally the opposite of trans, that is crazy. The idea that someone noticed the word cis was an acronym of comfortable in skin after getting it from the science community is much less crazy.
 
It's because if you call normal people normal than you're explicitly admitting being trans is abnormal.

Which is is, by definition. Then again, so is being left handed. Weirdly, nobody ever says cishanded, they usually just don't fucking mention it because normal people don't base their identity on one random aspect of themselves.

The only time it makes sense to use "cis" is in a setting where you're talking about differences between trans and non-trans people, and only then because it's easier to use than "Non-trans". In normal, day to day life, it's safe to assume everyone is non-trans, because there are so few of them that's a pretty safe assumption. If you do run into one, it's a special thing, like a blind person or a deaf person, or someone missing an arm. You make accommodation for their unusual status, typically.

What you don't do is insist because blind people exist then it's wrong to call not blind people just normal people. We don't refer to ourselves as "sighted hearing olfactorically functional quadropedic cisgendered straight alive mentally competent neurotypical white people"

We note the differences to the norm. You grow up in a predominantly white neighborhood, the black people stand out. You grow up in a predominantly black neighborhood, the white people stand out. Oh, that's Black Paul. Oh that's White Jimmy. Oh yeah that's Tom, he's blind. That's weird Jenny, he's a dude but he doesn't bother anyone, actually Jenny like to go by She.

The trans movement wants every conversation to have trans people involved in it, thus we have to say "cisgendered" all the time because everything is about these weirdo's fetishes.
 
Yeah. That's very true. Yet we still manage to go about the 99% of our lives where blind people aren't involved without constantly talking about blindness.

For some reason, people can't bridge the gap from there to trans stuff. You spend 99%+ of your life with stuff that has nothing to do with transexual people. So why do we need to constantly be talking about transexuality? Because "Cis" only exists within that conversation.
 
Here's a gallery of post election '16 salt I've had laying around and just remembered. It may be super old, but I didn't see this specific gallery posted around election time and didn't feel like going through the entire thread.

https://mega.nz/#!ocRFgAiL!pb7FsHzwaRhI8hSnsqRy4LT4l4CiYs9ZRVpko1FlYjY
https://imgur.com/a/Dti4L
http://archive.fo/0zpSw (it doesn't archive below the [load more images] button, so yeah)
Very salty. I need a drink!

(Good archive by the way)
 
Wherein they permanently ban a cop for being a cop, basically.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/of...south-suburban-bar.80508/page-5#post-14930226

Screenshot_20181113-205232~01.png
 
Those lolicon cucks...
The term is Lolicucks

The tranny who banned this guy probably jerked what's left of his mutilated cock to the idea of banning a cop.

Ya know we really should get somebody to sneak a survey onto REEEra and find out just what percentage of them are

a) troons
b) furries

because at this point im guessing the combined number has to be over half the population there
 
So the fuckers are humblebragging that Twitter filtered them due to growing "so much so fast".
XK9GtHS.jpg


Call me paranoid but I don't believe this bullshit for a second. Would anyone have any actual stats handy though?
ResetEra was blocked due to being listed on SpamHaus, which is about email spam, not web traffic. It kinda seems like an obvious lie on ResetEra LLCs part, or maybe they were just told misleading information from Twitter customer support.

None of my graphs show any change, probably most importantly the Unique Posters over 24H graph has never changed from it's typical week-to-week pattern since I started running it.
upload_2018-11-13_14-48-49.png
 
ReeTardERA had a thread yesterday where they tried to argue Persona 5 is pedophilia or something because it's played mostly by adults (except not really) and you can "date children" (because 17-year olds are children I guess) and the fact that the player character himself is 17 doesn't matter because adults are self-inserting and harmless cutscenes in which absolutely nothing sexual ever happens makes it cheese pizza because reasons (https://www.resetera.com/threads/persona-5-is-game-for-adults-in-which-you-date-children.80354/).

The mods let it go on for 8 pages before finally locking it because clearly there was only intelligent discussion to be had with such a well-thought out thread and it eventually led to this:

RetardEra219.jpg


wherein they banned a poster (duration pending!) for "dismissing child sexualization" in a game completely devoid of child sexualization.

I guess maybe teenagers being in swimsuits at the beach at one minor point in a 60-hour long game is child sexualization now?

Ultimately the thread ended with post #400:

RetardEra221.jpg


Minors dating in a game is considered child sexualization now too apparently ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

ResetERA: Child Sexualization Experts.

RetardEra220.jpg


Translation: "my waifu is shit"
 
ReeTardERA had a thread yesterday where they tried to argue Persona 5 is pedophilia or something because it's played mostly by adults (except not really) and you can "date children" (because 17-year olds are children I guess) and the fact that the player character himself is 17 doesn't matter because adults are self-inserting and harmless cutscenes in which absolutely nothing sexual ever happens makes it cheese pizza because reasons (https://www.resetera.com/threads/persona-5-is-game-for-adults-in-which-you-date-children.80354/).

The mods let it go on for 8 pages before finally locking it because clearly there was only intelligent discussion to be had with such a well-thought out thread and it eventually led to this:

View attachment 592177

wherein they banned a poster (duration pending!) for "dismissing child sexualization" in a game completely devoid of child sexualization.

I guess maybe teenagers being in swimsuits at the beach at one minor point in a 60-hour long game is child sexualization now?

Ultimately the thread ended with post #400:

View attachment 592187

Minors dating in a game is considered child sexualization now too apparently ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

ResetERA: Child Sexualization Experts.

View attachment 592186

Translation: "my waifu is shit"
All sexual content in media is degenerate, all inter-sex interactions should be kept to a minimum, and all clothing should conceal as much of your disgusting sinful flesh as possible.

Quick: am I a Puritan or SJW?
 
ReeTardERA had a thread yesterday where they tried to argue Persona 5 is pedophilia or something because it's played mostly by adults (except not really) and you can "date children" (because 17-year olds are children I guess) and the fact that the player character himself is 17 doesn't matter because adults are self-inserting and harmless cutscenes in which absolutely nothing sexual ever happens makes it cheese pizza because reasons (https://www.resetera.com/threads/persona-5-is-game-for-adults-in-which-you-date-children.80354/).

The mods let it go on for 8 pages before finally locking it because clearly there was only intelligent discussion to be had with such a well-thought out thread and it eventually led to this:

View attachment 592177

wherein they banned a poster (duration pending!) for "dismissing child sexualization" in a game completely devoid of child sexualization.

I guess maybe teenagers being in swimsuits at the beach at one minor point in a 60-hour long game is child sexualization now?

Ultimately the thread ended with post #400:

View attachment 592187

Minors dating in a game is considered child sexualization now too apparently ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

ResetERA: Child Sexualization Experts.

View attachment 592186

Translation: "my waifu is shit"

Aside from Kawakami (adult, teacher) being a literal prostitute as a side job, I can't think of any way how Persona 5 would be sexualized. Persona, in general, is just a harmless anime game devoid of any Japanese perversion in general (if not, very light amounts).
 

There's the usual tough talking to the banned guy, but one post caught my eye. I can't screencap right now but it said (emphasis mine)
Report the post, add to ignore list, and move on
ResetEra allows people to block other users, and yet they still have routine purges for wrongthink.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
ReeTardERA had a thread yesterday where they tried to argue Persona 5 is pedophilia or something because it's played mostly by adults (except not really) and you can "date children" (because 17-year olds are children I guess) and the fact that the player character himself is 17 doesn't matter because adults are self-inserting and harmless cutscenes in which absolutely nothing sexual ever happens makes it cheese pizza because reasons (https://www.resetera.com/threads/persona-5-is-game-for-adults-in-which-you-date-children.80354/).

The mods let it go on for 8 pages before finally locking it because clearly there was only intelligent discussion to be had with such a well-thought out thread and it eventually led to this:

View attachment 592177

wherein they banned a poster (duration pending!) for "dismissing child sexualization" in a game completely devoid of child sexualization.

I guess maybe teenagers being in swimsuits at the beach at one minor point in a 60-hour long game is child sexualization now?

Ultimately the thread ended with post #400:

View attachment 592187

Minors dating in a game is considered child sexualization now too apparently ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

ResetERA: Child Sexualization Experts.

View attachment 592186

Translation: "my waifu is shit"
zZGpa4b.jpg
 
Back