NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

https://www.resetera.com/threads/al...ghts-are-civil-rights-are-human-rights.94710/
"Congresswoman appears on a charity Twitch stream" was certainly not something i was expecting to see today.

It's really a moment for the history books. Historians are going to look back on this moment in awe.
If she'd known how to turn on the lights in the factory, our top national priority would have become amending the Constitution to let her run in 2020.
The absurdity of this is fucking amazing. Maybe everything isn't shit after all.
Oh wow, even her GOAT console pick is perfect

I didn't think I could love this woman any more than I already did but wow
AOC’s rise really seems special. Idk maybe I’m just overthinking it. But she seems to connect and resonate and say and do all the right things. It’s crazy how fast she’s climbed.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/hb...orturing-himself-playing-dk64-101-live.94407/

i think this is definitely the most some of them have oozed tard cum in years
 
View attachment 641669

Ubisoft is literally Hitler for writing my self-insert in a way I don't approve of.
Why is it always "Far Right" and nothing else? It's like how "Alt-Right" gets tossed around for anything vaguely Right-Wing or that happens to upset people despite such a broad descriptor makes you wonder what exactly is "Alternative" about it or what the "Normal right" is.

This use of words makes me go crosseyed trying to comprehend it.
 
Why is it always "Far Right" and nothing else? It's like how "Alt-Right" gets tossed around for anything vaguely Right-Wing or that happens to upset people despite such a broad descriptor makes you wonder what exactly is "Alternative" about it or what the "Normal right" is.

This use of words makes me go crosseyed trying to comprehend it.
Because the left (much like the right) needs boogie men to scare people into voting for them. They only see in black and white, us vs them, etc.

It’s groupthink, if you’re not agreeing with us you must be far right because only the extreme would disagree with giving puberty blockers to kids and mutilating their junk!
 
Last edited:
Because the left (much like the right) needs boogie men to scare people into voting for them. They only see in black and white, us vs them, etc.

It’s groupthink, if you’re not agreeing with us you must be far right because only the scream would disagree with giving puberty blockers to kids and mutilating their junk!
I know that much but what I'm confused on is how is it FAR right when you consider it the default state? How can something be ALTERNATIVE Right if it encompasses the entirety of everything to the right of you? Are they calling themselves right-wing so those people would be "far right"? The linguistics of these groupings doesn't work even for boogiemen.
 
I know that much but what I'm confused on is how is it FAR right when you consider it the default state? How can something be ALTERNATIVE Right if it encompasses the entirety of everything to the right of you? Are they calling themselves right-wing so those people would be "far right"? The linguistics of these groupings doesn't work even for boogiemen.
You're thinking about it too much. Alt right =bad and people who disagree with them = bad therefore people who disagree with them = Alt right. There's no logic to it really just REEEing.
 
I know that much but what I'm confused on is how is it FAR right when you consider it the default state? How can something be ALTERNATIVE Right if it encompasses the entirety of everything to the right of you? Are they calling themselves right-wing so those people would be "far right"? The linguistics of these groupings doesn't work even for boogiemen.

Because alt right really just means "Nazi" and everyone is a Nazi but people made fun of them for constantly calling everyone Nazis.
 

Great thread, only went through three pages and it was all gold.

resetera 1 20 2018.png


also that lol 69 post was from another thread

Both threads should just be screen capped in their entirety
 
When AOC doesn’t save the world, what happens?

Liberals do this all the time, put some mediocre idiot on a pedestal only for them to fail to live up to expectations (see: Obama who left the door open for Trump).

The best thing about wishy-washy democratic-socialists is they inevitably give us hardline Republicans.
 
Former trans icon Jamie Lee Curtis has 48 hours to apologize to ResetERA:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/ja...ens-there-are-two-sides-to-every-story.94750/
I'll give her a couple of days because till now she's (thus far)seemingly a good person and has no official political responsibility.

Why did she even bring this up in the first place? Like she should have just kept her mouth shut.
Why are people still doing this in 2019? I don't get it. There are not two sides to a person wearing a MAGA hat, just like there are not two sides of the story when a guy is wearing a swastika. That's all there is too it, full stop.
 
How the fuck are "white women" the "biggest supporters and perpetrators of white supremacy"? Please don't tell me it's because they don't take that black dick enough. It is because of that, isn't it?
Yes, even though black/white mixed race relationships (and all mixed race relationships that have a white person really) are also considered racist because that's just the way they roll.
 
Yes, even though black/white mixed race relationships (and all mixed race relationships that have a white person really) are also considered racist because that's just the way they roll.

Absolutely. I can't find it now but I saw this pic on Twitter that basically said that white women fantasize about black men when they're good looking, well behaved and obviously big dicked BUT they don't actually like them when they're brash, uneducated, unkempt and, you know, niggers. Which is wrong by the way, they should love them forever anyway anyhow.

I can't stress enough, even when they do take the black dick they're still being racist.
 
How the fuck are "white women" the "biggest supporters and perpetrators of white supremacy"? Please don't tell me it's because they don't take that black dick enough. It is because of that, isn't it?
That probably plays a factor in the angry black posters, but usually what is claimed is that in 2016, white women actually voted in favor of Trump and Republicans, by like 50-48-2 or something rather than their normal pattern of voting for Democrats 52-48. This contributed to his and other GOPers tight margins of victory in many states.

This thread was a good illustrator of this anger at white women before they locked it: https://www.resetera.com/threads/unofficial-womens-march-in-california-canceled-over-concerns.90541/
Facts are facts. Who voted him in? Who decided not to get their family to avoid this? Your protectionist placement is gross. Let the man have his say for fuck sake.
Sorry if I'm misreading this, but it sounds like you are putting blame on the white women who didn't vote Trump? For not controlling their families votes or something? Because that's who the "protectionism" seems to be about.
Do you think all of those white women got their racist ass families into a huddle? Did even most of them show up to vote, but then showed up for the pink hat march?
Do you think any of them reached out to POC to correct some shit, or actually no. They didn't. That's the point.
Are you trying to say that the majority of white women who attended the women's march were trumpers?
No. I said that all of you American white folk got family that voted for Trump. Fix that shit. And stop excluding the actual base from marches and rallies.
sorry folks, 'collective punishment' is for black people, not white women.

Only related because it's from that thread but this post never doesn't make me laugh:
I've been very specific in saying that even if you didn't vote for the shithead but you know someone that did, this shit is on you. Ain't a goddamn fool around me that would do that shit, and damn sure straight it's on me to make sure it doesn't happen.
 
I did some random looking at past GAF threads for something and I was noticing just how much stupider many of the users who had crossed over read as on ERA. The post count "shaming" thing is just like the peak example of how much they've given up trying to even think.

I wonder how many grade levels things would drop if you like inserted posts from a 2014-ish GAF thread (so even years after things started going downhill) and a modern ERA thread of similar topics into one of those online evaluators. I wouldn't be shocked if it fell below High School considering how bad the English is getting in general on ERA. And not just from the mod messages or Slayven.

https://resetera.kiwifarms.net/graphs

They really mostly top out around 5000 users on any given day. Less than 15% of the registered users actually post on a given day.

GAF's politics are sorta weird currently, they created a separate "politics" section. And overall, it's kinda balanced, seeming only more right-wing/pro-Trump because of how it used to be 18 months ago. That said, there are a few tards who post a shit-ton and are just plain bad posters. JordanN, for example, is a Canadian who posts constantly about "race-realist" bullshit like IQ and brain sizes, and almost any other nutty paleoconservative thing he can latch onto. And then there's idiots who won't stop responding to him or arguing with him over this. These kind of idiots derail every thread to have the same arguments over and over. So I think it makes things look even more right-wing/pro-Trump/etc. than it even is. Kinda like how it used to look more the opposite just because of all the same posters have the same shitty arguments for pages on end with lots of dogpiling.

It's the same kind of mob waiting to dogpile someone, but now it's JordanN and his cult being the mob that posts hundreds of times a day against people who post like ten times until they lure someone in.

I don't think GAF's mods realized, and they can just look at how its continued on ERA, that the problem was never WHY people were getting dogpiled, just that it was being encouraged rather than actual discussion. 20 troons mobbing every thread is only slightly worse than a bunch of Trump supporters/race realists/Hannity listeners now doing the same thing. All while crying to the mods that someone dare speak differently.

All of that said, to the GAF mods credit, they do seem to be ignoring it as long as it's in the "politics" section and it's not like insulting people or flaming with no argument. Which I always see as something that will work itself out compared to bans. Especially if people come back from ERA and do more push-back with liberal views it'll fix the problem on its own. Also they don't seem to freak out about drive-bys where somebody comes in to go "these liberals are faggots" or "Trump is a faggot" whereas it used to be like the end of the world.

To wrap up the carepost, I think ERA eating itself over the primaries will send people back to GAF if they still want to be on forums and in the "community" they've been in for years, and if GAF continues to let the politics section be a sort of "free fire" zone, it'll make things saner all around. (:optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic::optimistic:) Especially since they aren't moderating the other sections demanding only one opinion on whatever the twitter freakout of the week is. Just curbing the blatant racism/whatever and petty insults/fights like they used to do back in 2007 or so while allowing people to actually make shitposts or trolls or jokes. It was after the new mods wanted to shape the forums into some kind of progressive intellectual salon that they had all the problems, devs/journalists fled GAF, it lost all its importance, turned into nothing but garbage, etc.

Even back then I thought of GAF as over-moderated but it was easy enough to avoid ever getting banned just by not being a complete tard. I went like a decade without ever getting banned on there and I never posted any differently, it was just the mods that changed.
 
Back