Neosocialists (Neocommies) and reading question

Revo

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 16, 2019
I see on the internet and irl that there are some groups of people (mostly teens ) who are trying to establish communism to the western world and I decided to make this thread,because i want to know if these people have ever read Marx, Engels, Lenin or other communists philosophers ,before their beginning of the fight for communism.
 
Last edited:
Why would they read books by FUCKING WHITE MALES?

1579553306994.png
 
Most people aren't well versed in whatever political ideology they conform to, they just go with what feels right or seems to work for them.

Young people often like to think more idealistically than realistically, because they have less real-world experience and don't understand that a perfect ideal is extremely difficult to impossible to implement in reality and often comes with massive compromises which usually total in the deaths of millions of people. A young western communist thinks "free stuff! all we have to do is share!" and not realizing that thinning out resources equally between everyone under the rule of a monarch does not work for about a million wildly different reasons. When you grow up you begin to see the cynical nature of reality and human behavior and start to actually understand the actual best solution for everyone is one of the least "ideal" on paper.
 
Reading and writing is oppressive colonialist white supremacist technology.

Every time I read some dumb bitch's dating profile about "decolonizing science" or whatever, I think exactly of this. Literally all they do is parrot whatever their social gender justice studies instructors order them to.
 
Every time I read some dumb bitch's dating profile about "decolonizing science" or whatever, I think exactly of this. Literally all they do is parrot whatever their social gender justice studies instructors order them to.
Well they're not wrong, the most oppressed groups around today never independly invented written language.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
It's more like Socialism is whatever is the thing most benefiting to the speaker in the current second.
If the guy wants to gain power it's social programs.
If he has power it's social and economic engineering in a massive scale.
Take Phil aka ADF, he was a socialist who had no idea about politics and history and wouldn't have survived for long in Maoist China, but personally already lived in what he believed communism was, because capitalist America gave him a tugboat.
 
Have non ironic Brenton Tarrant supporters read The bell curve or Culture of critique? Have they looked deep into the concept of social darwinism or the supposed psychology of Jew's?

The answer on both sides is a resounding "Fuck no" both sides advocate without looking into the structure of there beliefs. Thus we have communists who sweep the effects of communist regimes under the rug and 8chan neo nazi's who do the same.

The main difference being Communism would actually be a net good for society if it worked out. Fascism by its contrary can never workout. Therefore advocating for communism can be said to be at its worst false idealism as opposed to the fascist dream of complete annihilation of the people I don't like.

I have read some Marx and Lenin btw. And Peter Kropotkin.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't apply to just socialism.
Most of the right-wing haven't even read their own books and only reference it for lip service.
I can count on one hand the right-wing people I knew who actually read their ideology and "traditionalists" I knew who have actually read Evola combined.
 
Have non ironic Brenton Tarrant supporters read The bell curve or Culture of critique
I went to a political rally of each party in the netherlands a couple of years back.

For one of the parties (let's call em the doomerparty), every second person I spoke with asked if I had read either culture of critique, decline of the west or the kalergi plan.

Though when I asked them to elaborate on the "kalergi plan" book, they usually had just read a vignette and not praktischer idealismus that supposedly describes the kalergi plan, so maybe asking whether I read those books was indeed some kind of virtue signalling. Then again on the other hand, these people seemed most engaged and knowledgable compared to what I experienced at other parties.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Fek
Back