🐱 'Nerd' and 'geek' insults should be classed as hate crimes, academic claims

CatParty


Calling people a 'nerd' and 'geek' should be classed as a hate crime, an academic has said after studying the impact of bullying on high IQ children.

Psychology lecturer and psychotherapist Dr Sonja Falck said the "divisive and humiliating" anti-IQ terms are hate crime's "last taboo".

Dr Falck, who also runs a Harley-Street psychotherapy practice warned that the harmful words should be categorised in the same way as homophobic, racial, and religious slurs are under UK hate speech legislation.

A specialist in individuals with very high IQ, Dr Falck has spent eight years researching the discrimination against them, and interviewing high-ability adults about their own experiences.

During 20 hour and a half interviews (of which 16 were Mensa members) Dr Falck asked individuals about their experience, such as how they had come to realise that they had a high IQ.

She then conducted a contextual analysis of literature and other research to identify themes, one of which was the idea of belonging or not belonging.

“That was a really big one,” she told the Telegraph. “That’s where being taunted with names like ‘nerd’ or ‘egghead’ or ‘brainiac’ comes in because the person is being set apart as being different to others and feeling like they’re a misfit and they don’t belong.”

Dr Falck added that all her interviewees had felt like this at some point in their lives.

Her research has now been published in her new book 'Extreme Intelligence'.

Speaking at the book launch, she said the next Government must take legislative action to force societal change.

She said: "The N-word was common parlance in the UK until at least the 1960s.

"Other insulting slurs about age, disability, religion and gender identity remained in widespread use until relatively recently.

"Society at the time turned a blind eye to their impact by passing them off as harmless banter.

"It is only with the benefit of hindsight and academic research that we realise how wrong we were.

"The same can be said about anti-IQ words like 'nerd', 'brainbox', 'geek', 'egg-head', 'smart-arse', 'dweeb' and 'smarty-pants'," she added.

"Slurs such as these will continue to be used unabated at the expense of the brightest members of society unless and until legislative action is taken."

In England and Wales, any communication which is threatening or abusive and directed towards a person on account of their race, colour, disability, nationality, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity is classed as hate crime.

It is covered by a variety of statutes including the Public Order Act 1986 and penalties can include imprisonment, fines, or both.


"The government says it is committed to creating an outward-looking, inclusive society yet continues to tolerate divisive, discriminatory language," Dr Falck added.

"In the short space of time since racial, homophobic and religious hate speech was banned, it is now seen by most as morally abhorrent.”

"It would be progress for British society to come to feel the same way about hate-filled, prejudicial slurs against our high-IQ community."

Dr Falck went on to warn that such name-calling, especially as a child, can cause psychological damage that may last a lifetime and that extending legislation to include these slurs would help to stamp out the "archaic" victimisation of more than one million Britons with a 'gifted' IQ score of 132 or over.

Dr Falck is herself a member of high-IQ society Mensa, the international high IQ society, who support non-discrimination against those with very high IQ.

John Stevenage, CEO of Mensa, said: "Very high-IQ individuals often experience isolation or bullying from people around them because they are perceived as being different from the majority.

“"Mensa as an organisation gives people with very high IQ a community which is non-judgemental and inclusive of difference.

"Put simply, everybody is different, so no-one is."
 
I don’t call a smart person a nerd unless they call me a manwhore first. And everybody in the room is telling the truth, so what’s the problem?
 
What??? MENSA is judgy as fuck. The whole thing is a constant pissing match.

They’re just more sophisticated about it than simply using words like egghead.

The most horrifying person I know is in Mensa and is an Ivy league educated corporate lawyer. Intelligence does you no good if you can't make human connections. She's emotionally stupid, does a lot of autistic shreiking to get her way and I'm pretty sure she's going to die alone. They live a crapsaccharine existence and get a monthly newsletter.
 
5128450_640px.jpg
 
The last taboo of hate crimes is ending tall people hate. Calling people bean pole or asking "hows the weather up there" is not ok and we need a UN resolution to stop it.

They want partner, not to indulge in submission fetish. We call incels with those fetishes cucks.
 
The last taboo of hate crimes is ending tall people hate. Calling people bean pole or asking "hows the weather up there" is not ok and we need a UN resolution to stop it.
Amen, brother. We are not your personal crane, stop asking us to get things off high shelves. And stop putting things on shelves below 18 inches high, that’s discrimination.

(Now, @Superman93, since you’re apparently the arbiter of what is and isn’t acceptable in A&H, is this acceptably off-topic since it’s responding to another post that is not directly related to the topic at hand, or is this unacceptably off-topic because it’s only related to discrimination and not nerds?

Also, could you tell that this one was a joke? See, I was pointing out that being tall makes it harder to reach things low to the ground and making the oblique conparison to wheelchair ramps and other concessions for the disabled.

Ok, blink once for yes and twice for no.
 
Generally speaking, people with exceptionally high IQs often have exceptionally low EQs, so they're not going to feel like they fit in anywhere or possibly even understand why they don't. You can ban all the descriptors you want, it won't make a difference because people will come up with new insults--humans are creative when it comes to putting each other down and beating each other up.

"Normative" behavior and the interpretation of such can be taught. There's also the concept that adversity builds resilience and can shape positive character traits, thus a little hardship isn't a bad thing. Academics should be studying that if they're really interested in combating issues such as bullying and hate speech.

But we all know that academia is way more interested in creating new and improved problems instead of solving existing (or in some cases, completely fabricated) ones.
 
"Nerd" and "geek" as insults were never about being smart, they were for implying someone had autistic traits before autism was a thing. It meant somebody was some combination of unattractive, socially inept, unaware of their appearance, and/or had obsessive niche interests that didn't increase their social appeal.

Crying that everyone was mean to you because you were smart and then running off and joining MENSA just proves that, on some level, they were right.
 
I've seen people embrace the word like Tumblr with queer cos it's "taking it back" or whatever, pretending the words don't bother them.

PS: I want to bully my local nerds and geeks, putting them in their place for speaking out.
 
Back