US Nevada Rangers plow truck through Extinction Rebellion protest after the activists blocked road into Burning Man - WTF I love Reservation Police now?!

Tribal cops have smashed through a climate protest blocking the road to Burning Man in Nevada – as footage shows them taking a no-nonsense approach to the activists.

Video shows around six activists from Seven Circles and Extinction Rebellion blocking a road with a trailer, causing traffic chaos and miles-long gridlock.

The demonstrators locked themselves on to the trailer and appeared to clash with those trying to attend Burning Man, before police were called on Sunday.

Rangers from the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribal Police Department of Nevada drove straight through the blockade and quickly began arresting demonstrators on the road as they sobbed: 'We're non-violent'.

One tribal officer got out of the vehicle and ordered a woman to the floor at gunpoint before telling her to 'stop resisting' arrest.

Another can be heard asking a protestors 'who has the gun', as the protestors say 'we have no weapons at all, we're environmental protestors'.

Guardian journalist Michelle Hooq claimed on social media that the Rangers attended the protest after receiving a call that 'someone in the crowd was going to shoot the activists'.

DailyMail.com did not immediately receive a response to a request for comment from Extinction Rebellion, Seven Circles or the PLPTPD.

One ranger could be heard saying that the protestors were 'trespassing on tribal land', before several were arrested and taken into custody.

Social media for Rave Revolution posted the footage and captioned it: 'Nevada Ranger rammed into the blockade, an officer pulled out his gun and threatened to shoot.

'Activists from Extinction Rebellion and Rave Revolution Global were demanding that the festival ban private jets and single-use plastics.'

Photos from the protest show an XR banner that says 'Ban Private Jets', as well as other signs which say 'Burners of the world unite, and 'abolish capitalism'.

Last year Rave Revolution installed a 'climate-related art piece' at Burning Man, and said that their 'feedback was excellent' so they were looking for an 'expanded presence' in 2023.

Extinction Rebellion has not yet released an official statement on the protest, but the Seattle branch of the group tweeted: 'Why would a police officer risk public safety like that?'

Seven Circles say that their aim is to 'draw attention to capitalism's inability to address climate and ecological breakdown'.

Protestors said they were also against 'the popularization of Burning Man among affluent people who do not live the stated values of Burning Man, resulting in the commodification of the event.'

Mun Chong, an Extinction Rebellion protestor, said: 'The time has come. Burning Man should aim to have the same type of political impact that Woodstock had on counter-culture.

'If we are honest about system change, it needs to start at 'home'. Ban the lowest hanging fruit immediately: private jets.

'No single individual should have the luxury of emitting 10 to 20 times more carbon pollution than a commercial airline passenger. Burners, rebel with us.'

They claim Burning Man's apolitical stance is 'detrimental to its claimed values, especially as carbon emissions continue to rise despite government and corporate commitments to reduce carbon emissions by more than half by 2030.'

Thomas Diocano, co-founder of Rave Revolution, added: 'We do not have a climate problem, the climate is behaving exactly in line with the laws of physics.

'We have an economic system problem, and that economic system is capitalism. History shows that capitalism cannot be reformed.

'It cannot be changed from the 'inside'. Are we really ready to sacrifice everything for an outdated, unequal economic system? The time to evolve has come.'

Among its demands are that Burning Man leadership 'advocate for system change on both political and economic levels' and ban private jets, single-use plastics, 'unnecessary propane burning and unlimited generator use' at the nine-day event.

 
Last edited:
McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. (2020)
What is even your arguement about now at this point? McGirt was regarding State Criminal Jurisdiction over Oklahoma indians and has nothing to do with Tribal Sovereignty vis a vis the Federal Government and has mostly to do with how much Congress fucked up terminating the tribes in Oklahoma.

Your original statement was this:
The [...] federal government doesn't have police powers in tribal jurisdictions.
The federal government has absolute criminal jurisdiction and law enforcement power in Tribal jurisdictions which is officially known as "Indian Country under Federal Law

18 USC 1152
Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, the general laws of the United States as to the punishment of offenses committed in any place within the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, except the District of Columbia, shall extend to the Indian country.

This section shall not extend to offenses committed by one Indian against the person or property of another Indian, nor to any Indian committing any offense in the Indian country who has been punished by the local law of the tribe, or to any case where, by treaty stipulations, the exclusive jurisdiction over such offenses is or may be secured to the Indian tribes respectively.
18 USC 1153
(a)Any Indian who commits against the person or property of another Indian or other person any of the following offenses, namely, murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, maiming, a felony under chapter 109A, incest, a felony assault under section 113, an assault against an individual who has not attained the age of 16 years, felony child abuse or neglect, arson, burglary, robbery, and a felony under section 661 of this title within the Indian country, shall be subject to the same law and penalties as all other persons committing any of the above offenses, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States.
(b)Any offense referred to in subsection (a) of this section that is not defined and punished by Federal law in force within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States shall be defined and punished in accordance with the laws of the State in which such offense was committed as are in force at the time of such offense.
Additionally under 25 USC 1302 Tribes can only impose a maximum penalty of 1 year meaning they are limited to only legislating misdemeanors.
(a)In general
No Indian tribe in exercising powers of self-government shall-

(7)
(B)except as provided in subparagraph (C), impose for conviction of any 1 offense any penalty or punishment greater than imprisonment for a term of 1 year or a fine of $5,000, or both;
25 USC 2801 BIA is primary Law Enforcement agency in Indian Country
(a)Responsibility of Secretary
The Secretary, acting through the Bureau, shall be responsible for providing, or for assisting in the provision of, law enforcement services in Indian country as provided in this chapter.

(b)Office of Justice Services
There is established in the Bureau an office, to be known as the “Office of Justice Services”, that, under the supervision of the Secretary, or an individual designated by the Secretary, shall be responsible for—
(1)carrying out the law enforcement functions of the Secretary in Indian country, and
(2)implementing the provisions of this section.

25 USC 2803 BIA Police powers
The Secretary may charge employees of the Bureau with law enforcement responsibilities and may authorize those employees to—
(1)carry firearms;
(2)execute or serve warrants, summonses, or other orders relating to a crime committed in Indian country and issued under the laws of—
(A)the United States (including those issued by a Court of Indian Offenses under regulations prescribed by the Secretary or offenses processed by the Central Violations Bureau); or
(B)an Indian tribe if authorized by the Indian tribe;
(3)make an arrest without a warrant for an offense committed in Indian country if—
(A)the offense is committed in the presence of the employee,[1]
(B)the offense is a felony and the employee has probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed, or is committing, the felony;
(C)the offense is a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, dating violence, stalking, or violation of a protection order and has, as an element, the use or attempted use of physical force, or the threatened use of a deadly weapon, committed by a current or former spouse, parent, or guardian of the victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabited with the victim as a spouse, parent, or guardian, or by a person similarly situated to a spouse, parent or guardian of the victim, and the employee has probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed, or is committing the crime; or
(D)
(i)the offense involves—
(I)a misdemeanor controlled substance offense in violation of—
(aa)the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.);
(bb)title IX of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (21 U.S.C. 862a et seq.); [2] or
(cc)section 865 of title 21;
(II)a misdemeanor firearms offense in violation of chapter 44 of title 18;
(III)a misdemeanor assault in violation of chapter 7 of title 18; or
(IV)a misdemeanor liquor trafficking offense in violation of chapter 59 of title 18; and
(ii)the employee has probable cause to believe that the individual to be arrested has committed, or is committing, the crime;
(4)offer and pay a reward for services or information, or purchase evidence, assisting in the detection or investigation of the commission of an offense committed in Indian country or in the arrest of an offender against the United States;
(5)make inquiries of any person, and administer to, or take from, any person an oath, affirmation, or affidavit, concerning any matter relevant to the enforcement or carrying out in Indian country of a law of either the United States or an Indian tribe that has authorized the employee to enforce or carry out tribal laws;
(6)wear a prescribed uniform and badge or carry prescribed credentials;
(7)perform any other law enforcement related duty; and
(8)when requested, assist (with or without reimbursement) any Federal, tribal, State, or local law enforcement agency in the enforcement or carrying out of the laws or regulations the agency enforces or administers.
25 USC 2806 BIA Police Jurisdiction
(a)Investigative jurisdiction over offenses against criminal laws
The Secretary shall have investigative jurisdiction over offenses against criminal laws of the United States in Indian country subject to an agreement between the Secretary and the Attorney General of the United States.

Now on to other things.
In another landmark case, Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe 455 U.S. 130 (1982), SCOTUS ruled an Indian tribe has the authority to impose taxes on non-Indians that are conducting business on the reservation as an inherent power under their tribal sovereignty. BIA tried to issue regulations that limited their ability to do so but backed down after several tribes went on the warpath.
Did you even read the facts of the case? The US Supreme Court even noted in their ruling that the BIA had approved the tribal taxes that lead to that case.

BIA is an administrative agency, not a governing agency
What is the difference between an administrative and a governing agency?

Until 1975 the BIA provided all government essential services on the Rez, that includes law enforcement, the only thing that changed is the Indian Self Determination Act of 1975 gave tribes the right to administer those government services under contract with the Department of Interior, whatever services they don't provide (usually law enforcement) are still provided by the BIA, read the fucking law.

that they issue regulations is not proof tribes are under contract to a government agency or whatever nonsense claim you made;
25 USC 5301
(j) “self-determination contract” means a contract entered into under subchapter I (or a grant or cooperative agreement used under SECTION 5308 OF THIS TITLE) between a Tribal organization and the appropriate Secretary for the planning, conduct, and administration of programs or services that are otherwise provided to Indian Tribes and members of Indian Tribes pursuant to Federal law, subject to the condition that, except as provided in SECTION 5324(A
25 USC 5321
(a)Request by tribe; authorized programs
(1)The Secretary is directed, upon the request of any Indian tribe by tribal resolution, to enter into a self-determination contract or contracts with a tribal organization to plan, conduct, and administer programs or portions thereof, including construction programs—
(A)provided for in the Act of April 16, 1934 (48 Stat. 596), as amended [25 U.S.C. 5342 et seq.];
(B)which the Secretary is authorized to administer for the benefit of Indians under the Act of November 2, 1921 (42 Stat. 208) [25 U.S.C. 13], and any Act subsequent thereto;
(C)provided by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Act of August 5, 1954 (68 Stat. 674), as amended [42 U.S.C. 2001 et seq.];
(D)administered by the Secretary for the benefit of Indians for which appropriations are made to agencies other than the Department of Health and Human Services or the Department of the Interior; and
(E)for the benefit of Indians because of their status as Indians without regard to the agency or office of the Department of Health and Human Services or the Department of the Interior within which it is performed.
The programs, functions, services, or activities that are contracted under this paragraph shall include administrative functions of the Department of the Interior and the Department of Health and Human Services (whichever is applicable) that support the delivery of services to Indians, including those administrative activities supportive of, but not included as part of, the service delivery programs described in this paragraph that are otherwise contractable. The administrative functions referred to in the preceding sentence shall be contractable without regard to the organizational level within the Department that carries out such functions.
 
These protestors deserve whatever consequences come from their behavior. It's one thing to protest to raise awareness or stand up to perceived wrongs. It's another to be destructive and it's ironic - if not hypocritical - when environmental protestors cause traffic jams that harm the environment more than normal traffic flow would.
As the Joker might said:"they got what they fuckin' desserve".
 
McGirt was regarding State Criminal Jurisdiction over Oklahoma indians and has nothing to do with Tribal Sovereignty vis a vis the Federal Government
It precisely addresses sovereignty and the limits of jurisdiction . You just refuse to accept that it does, and that its one of the precedents regarding any issues regarding tribal police powers on tribal land, for all federally recognized tribes in the United States. I'm not going over what I posted earlier since I already explained to you what the exceptions are, and why.

You can quote the entire CFR here (under any circumstance do not) and it still will not change Congress is the only authority regarding tribal matters, with SCOTUS having the final say. BIA is merely an administrative agency, like the FCC. NLRB or NTSB. If Congress passes legislation that says tribes may demand non-natives conduct business solely in a tribal language, and SCOTUS says "Yep, that's OK under the Constitution" then English/Native Language interpreters will be worth their weight in gold the next day, and the CFR will be revised accordingly.*

*I am compelled to emphasize this is a hypothetical to illustrate a point, and as such does not mean that I am stating it has or will be the case in the future.
 
Whats up with current day lefties not knowing how to protest? Yeah. You'll really show all those dirty hippies that basically believe everything you do! It's like last year when a BLM protest/March happened at my local farmers market. Nigger, that's about as crunchy left as it gets.
They're attention seekers looking for one thing: attention.
 
It precisely addresses sovereignty and the limits of jurisdiction . You just refuse to accept that it does, and that its one of the precedents regarding any issues regarding tribal police powers on tribal land, for all federally recognized tribes in the United States. I'm not going over what I posted earlier since I already explained to you what the exceptions are, and why.

You can quote the entire CFR here (under any circumstance do not) and it still will not change Congress is the only authority regarding tribal matters, with SCOTUS having the final say. BIA is merely an administrative agency, like the FCC. NLRB or NTSB. If Congress passes legislation that says tribes may demand non-natives conduct business solely in a tribal language, and SCOTUS says "Yep, that's OK under the Constitution" then English/Native Language interpreters will be worth their weight in gold the next day, and the CFR will be revised accordingly.*

*I am compelled to emphasize this is a hypothetical to illustrate a point, and as such does not mean that I am stating it has or will be the case in the future.
Sir, the subject is your statement that the Federal Government doesn't have police powers on Tribal land, please address that and stop deflecting to unrelated points about tribal vs state soveriegnty.

Also my last post was exclusively US Code.
 
Last edited:
Seems like all those protestors wanted to do was save lives, since 70,000 of them are stranded after flooding. in a fucking desert.

I doubt many of those will survive the desert and those who do will have a hard time not having a grudge against the protestors, or anything related to climate change.


I'm sure this will end very well for the activists involved.
zp8DJmO.gif
 
I guess someone managed to die. Authorities aren’t releasing statements about the death
I've heard it was somone messing with a generator in the rain, which isn't as interesting as ebola but a more realistic cause of death.

I do like the idea of people stranded in the mud and their own filth getting paranoid about diseases. Fun!
 
I guess someone managed to die. Authorities aren’t releasing statements about the death but the rumours at the festival are that they died of the fucking Ebola virus.

Jesus christ lmao
That would be hilarious on so many levels but it's more likely that a fucking meteor smashes into them all. If there are any mass illnesses going around involving poo or blood it's Norovirus or some nasty E. coli strains
 
Back