US New Title IX rules set to assert rights of transgender students - 🤡🌏

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1648658435946.png

Discrimination against transgender students would be a violation of federal civil rights law under proposed regulations the Education Department is expected to finalize in the coming weeks.

Title IX bars discrimination on the basis of sex in education, and the new rules would make clear this includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, among other things, according to two people familiar with a draft of the proposed regulation who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly comment on the subject.

Regulations carry the power of law. The rules, if finalized, would set up a clash with state laws that bar transgender women from competing in women’s sports. Those statutes are already being challenged in the courts.

A spokeswoman for the Education Department declined to comment on what will be in the proposed regulation, which the administration has said it expects to publish in April.

The draft text of the regulation included this key sentence, according to the people familiar with it: “Discrimination on the basis of sex includes discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes, sex-related characteristics (including intersex traits), pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity.”

The regulations would also rewrite, for the third time in three administrations, complex rules for universities and K-12 schools in adjudicating allegations of sexual harassment and assault. The Trump administration’s version included more due process rights for the accused, and the new version is expected to be friendlier to those leveling the accusations.

National debate over gay and lesbian rights has quieted, but there remains a storm of controversy around transgender rights, often focused on bathroom use and, in more recent months, participation in sports. Twelve states, including Utah, Texas, Florida, Idaho and South Dakota, have passed laws banning transgender girls and women from participating in girls’ and women’s sports.

They argue that transgender girls have a biological advantage over cisgender girls, though others debate that point.

The highly anticipated Title IX rules are under review at the White House. The next step is a notice of proposed rulemaking, giving the public the chance to comment before they are finalized.

Last summer, the Education Department heard pleas from both sides of the issue of transgender girls and women in sports during public hearings ahead of the rulemaking.

“Under the Title IX, every student who wants to should be able to play and feel welcome as who they are,” Amit Paley, chief executive of the Trevor Project, a suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for LGBTQ youths, told the department. “By ensuring that LGBTQ young people have access to a welcoming and affirming school environment, the Department of Education can improve student mental health and well-being and ultimately save lives.”

The department also heard from cisgender women who see transgender women as unfair competition. Cynthia Monteleone, a world champion sprinter and girls’ track coach, spoke about her daughter racing and coming in second place against a transgender girl who had played volleyball as a boy. “My daughter trained for two years for this first race. This transgender athlete trained for track for two weeks,” she said.

She added that she tries to teach the girls she coaches that hard work pays off. “How can I continue to teach this … when, quite literally, average boys can change their identity and beat the top female in the competition?” she asked.

The issue has been thrust into the headlines by Lia Thomas, a transgender woman who swims for the University of Pennsylvania and this month won an NCAA Division I championship in the 500-yard women’s freestyle. She swam for the Penn men’s team before undergoing more than two years of hormone replacement therapy.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) responded to Thomas’s victory by declaring the second-place finisher, a Florida resident, to be the “rightful winner.”

Other Republicans have also staked out strong anti-transgender positions, notably Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), who directed state agencies to investigate parents who allow gender-affirming care for transgender children. The state attorney general declared such treatments to be a form of “child abuse.”

The language of the new federal regulation regarding gender identity or sexual orientation could change, but that’s not expected given that the Biden administration has repeatedly said it views Title IX’s protections to include them both. Officials cite a related 2020 Supreme Court decision regarding employment discrimination.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the right for LGBTQ+ people to live and work without fear of harassment, exclusion and discrimination — and our LGBTQ+ students have the same rights and deserve the same protections,” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said last year.

Cardona also taped a video with his cousin, Alex Cardona, a transgender man. In their conversation, the secretary says: “I also want to send a message really loud and clear: We’ve got your back, that our schools need to be safe places for all students.”

Much of the attention around the forthcoming Title IX regulation centers on how schools must handle allegations of sexual harassment and assault. The Obama administration issued informal guidance on sexual violence complaints, which Education Secretary Betsy DeVos immediately rescinded. In May 2020, DeVos replaced that guidance with a formal regulation, setting a strict definition for what constitutes sexual harassment and giving more due process rights to those accused.

The Biden administration announced last year that it would rewrite those regulations, and the new version is expected to be friendlier to accusers and survivors of sexual harassment and violence.

“We know from the cases we’ve litigated that too often survivors are ignored, disbelieved or even punished for reporting sexual harassment,” said Shiwali Patel, director of justice for student survivors at the National Women’s Law Center. “The Trump rule requires schools to ignore many instances of sexual harassment.”

Title IX is a 1972 law that bars discrimination on the basis of sex in any educational program or activity that receives federal money. Schools found in violation risk losing federal aid. Advocates have long held that this definition rightfully includes discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

They got backup in 2020, when the Supreme Court ruled, 6-3, that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects gay and transgender workers from employment discrimination. Title VII bars discrimination because of sex, and in the landmark case of Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga., the high court said people fired for being gay or transgender are being treated differently because of their sex.

The case did not directly address sex discrimination in education, but interpretations of Title IX have typically echoed those of Title VII because the language is so similar.

In her final days in office, in January 2021, DeVos issued a memorandum arguing that the Bostock decision did not bar similar discrimination in education. In June 2021, the Biden administration issued its own guidance arguing the opposite, announcing that this interpretation would guide the department in processing complaints and conducting investigations.

Since then, the Office for Civil Rights has completed a handful of investigations related to transgender discrimination, a senior agency official said. One case involved a student who was barred from using a locker room. After the complaint was filed, the district changed its policy. In another case, an adult alleged discrimination for advocating for transgender rights; the department found no discrimination. In a third case, the department mediated a solution involving a transgender student who alleged harassment at school.

Another 54 cases involving transgender discrimination are pending, a spokeswoman said. In a resource flier meant to help schools, the Education Department offered several hypothetical examples of situations that the civil rights office might investigate.

Among them: A lesbian student isn’t allowed to bring her girlfriend to the prom. School administrators fail to protect a transgender boy who is being harassed by peers and called by his former name, or a college fails to aid a gay student who is harassed for being gay. A high school bars a transgender girl from using the girls’ bathroom.

“School is a very vulnerable place for LGBTQ youth,” said Sarah Warbelow, legal director at the Human Rights Campaign, an advocacy group. “The more people understand their [legal] obligations, the better off everyone is.”


 
Truly the greatest disaster to ever befall our species - we got it right for thousands of years and it only took a few decades after we lost our minds and let women have a say before everything turned to shit.

What are the voting patterns of these working class women, I wonder.
View attachment 5927224
Truth of the matter is there is no stopping the femoid menace and its inevitable consequences within a system where women are allowed to vote.
You're right. We must reduce women to second-class citizens. Thank you O'wise racesperg for this wisdom.
 
Otterly, I have one simple thing to say: men have little reason to reestablish women's only spaces when men's only spaces are outlawed. That is why there's such a large part of men that are shrugging and saying 'not my fight' because an increasingly large group of men have never had a mens only space that wouldn't fold in an instant if any woman wanted to join.

Is it cold? Sure it is. It's where we're at now.
Yep. The only way women get their spaces back is if we abolish Title IX and other misandrist laws, codes and regulations and have true equality again. For the last 60 years, equality just means a series of privileges for women. I don’t see many feminists going for actual equality though, just fighting to get their privileges restored. If that’s what they want, then they’re going to have to fight for it themselves. And no, the whole “you can fight for our privileges first and maybe we’ll kick a few crumbs over your way” no longer works.
 
I mentioned earlier that that is why we need more right-wing lawyers. You can't fight activist judges with plumbers. You need someone within the system to do it. Scott Greer is right - we need more young men forming law firms like the ADF to defeat these policies.
I don't necessarily agree with the political positions of the ADF or its clients, but I definitely agree with their aggressive defense of Constitutional rights. They've picked up a lot of the slack left as the ACLU has sunk into irrelevant wokery.
 
Truly the greatest disaster to ever befall our species - we got it right for thousands of years and it only took a few decades after we lost our minds and let women have a say before everything turned to shit.

What are the voting patterns of these working class women, I wonder.
View attachment 5927224
Truth of the matter is there is no stopping the femoid menace and its inevitable consequences within a system where women are allowed to vote.
Hey it's this graph! Now break it down by race. Only white women lean Republican in any measure - ALL NON WHITES vote Democrat. Blacks it's over 90%, Hispanics 70-80%, Asians 65% and over.
q3clcex3mgf21.jpg
And since demographics are changing - thanks to the Hart-Celler act, signed by males (one a Kennedy, the other a Jew), you can kiss any future Republican president goodbye.

In total between 2000 and 2018, 10 states saw a 10 percentage point or greater decline in the share of White eligible voters. In Nevada, the White share of the electorate fell 18 percentage points over almost two decades, the largest drop among all 50 states. The decline in the White share of the electorate in Nevada has been fairly steady, with a comparable percentage point decline observed between 2000 and 2010 (10 points) and 2010 and 2018 (8 points). California has experienced a similarly sharp decline in the White share of the electorate, dropping 15 percentage points since 2000. This has resulted in California changing from a majority White electorate in 2000 to a state where White voters were a minority share of the electorate in 2018 (60% in 2000 to 45% in 2018), though they still are the largest racial or ethnic group in the electorate.
As reflected on the national level, Hispanic eligible voters have been the primary drivers of the racial and ethnic diversification of most states’ electorates. In 39 states between 2000 and 2018, Hispanic eligible voters saw the largest percentage point increase compared with any other racial or ethnic group. In three additional states – Alaska, Kentucky and Ohio – Hispanic voters were tied with another racial group for the highest increase. Five states that observed the largest growth in Hispanic shares in their electorates were California (11 percentage points), Nevada (10 points), Florida (9 points), Arizona (8 points) and Texas (8 points).
You want to Repeal the 19th? I better see all those non whites get back on the boat, with you kicking them back on it. All these men get real excited about putting women in their place, but they suddenly lose their voice when it comes to sending Jorge back to Mexico or Jamal back to Africa.

I would also like to remind you Rome had a tranny issue with Elagabalus when women were legally not considered citizens, and men crossdressed as female prostitutes (Eleanor Rykard) in the Middle Ages, when women were also not considered citizens. Men created SRS and synthesized those cross-sex hormones, so that's on you king.
Yep. The only way women get their spaces back is if we abolish Title IX and other misandrist laws, codes and regulations and have true equality again. For the last 60 years, equality just means a series of privileges for women. I don’t see many feminists going for actual equality though, just fighting to get their privileges restored. If that’s what they want, then they’re going to have to fight for it themselves. And no, the whole “you can fight for our privileges first and maybe we’ll kick a few crumbs over your way” no longer works.
I don't see many men advocating for blacks and other non whites to lose their vote or to get on the boat back to their country of origin. I see plenty of men say 'Repeal the 19th', NONE saying 'Repeal the Hart-Celler Act'. Not to mention I don't think you would like 'actual equality', because most of those 'misandrist laws' such as child support are there for a reason. If this is about divorce, college educated men and women have the lowest divorce rates and higher relationship satisfaction.

We get it. You don't want to fight the culture war anymore because men have gotten it so hard. Opt out, then. Don't complain when your priests and local community members troon out and rape somebody, because you chose to look the other way because it wasn't your job to fix. When your son starts calling himself 'Luna', we'll just shrug and say you should've been a better father - just like you tell women they should have picked better. Actions have consequences, after all.

Just like the white women getting punched in the face by rampaging black men, it's funny until that shit comes to your neighbourhood. Then you can't ignore it anymore. Then there is no one to blame but yourself.
 
You want to Repeal the 19th? I better see all those non whites get back on the boat, with you kicking them back on it. All these men get real excited about putting women in their place, but they suddenly lose their voice when it comes to sending Jorge back to Mexico or Jamal back to Africa.
I like this plan. Get rid of the darkies and (((bankers))) then repeal the 19th. Or is it the other way around? Either way, works for me.
 
I don't see many men advocating for blacks and other non whites to lose their vote or to get on the boat back to their country of origin. I see plenty of men say 'Repeal the 19th', NONE saying 'Repeal the Hart-Celler Act'. Not to mention I don't think you would like 'actual equality', because most of those 'misandrist laws' such as child support are there for a reason. If this is about divorce, college educated men and women have the lowest divorce rates and higher relationship satisfaction.
Maybe when women stop voting for the pro-nigger policies pro-troon anti-civilization policies.
 
If you want to opt-out of society and its issues, fine. Do not complain when society has lost its morals. If women are pushing this, men should be the rational sex and oppose it, not ignore it. Men show up at school board meetings, too. Fathers. There's nothing stopping you from saying, 'This is enough'. Tell the shitlib feminists to shove it.
So when these men do stand up and innevitably end up jobless and ostrasized thanks to laws and social standards that women are responsible for, what happens then?

This attitude is bizzare as all hell. Men vote against it, women vote for it, but somehow the onus is on the men to ruin their lives and somehow fix it without women losing the vote.

Its literally wanting to have your cake and eat it too.
 
Hey it's this graph! Now break it down by race. Only white women lean Republican in any measure - ALL NON WHITES vote Democrat. Blacks it's over 90%, Hispanics 70-80%, Asians 65% and over.
white women still lean far more democrat than white men do in these graphs, nearly five times more
holy shit
Its literally wanting to have your cake and eat it too.
that is the attitude
it was okay that title IX existed when it benefited women but now that it may do societal damage, it's a horrible monster that must be destroyed
also, it's our fault
Maybe when women stop voting for the pro-nigger policies pro-troon anti-civilization policies.
it's only muh poc, my dude
don't believe your lying eyes
 
I like this plan. Get rid of the darkies and (((bankers))) then repeal the 19th. Or is it the other way around? Either way, works for me.
Ban porn and eliminate taxes for each child born and we can reach an agreement.
Maybe when women stop voting for the pro-nigger policies pro-troon anti-civilization policies.
Hey bud, you emancipated them first. Blacks got the right to vote and before all white women did. There were no calls for civilization ending then; there are barely any calls for it ending among the mainstream Right now (unless you consider Nick Fuentes).
So when these men do stand up and innevitably end up jobless and ostrasized thanks to laws and social standards that women are responsible for, what happens then?
Sounds like you need more right-wing lawyers, which is something I've said needs to happen. But you tell your sons to go into the trades which does not actively change the culture. The Alliance Defending Freedom is the conservative law firm right now. If you have more of those, you can defeat these laws at the source. If you are upset about child support laws or family courts not granting equal custody, please note that in most cases, the father does not seek custody at all:

It depends on the applicable definition of “never,” but generally, this is untrue. The most recent available Census statistics show that fathers represent around one in five custodial parents—an improvement over the 16 percent of custodial parents reported in 1994. However, studies indicate that dads simply do not ask for custody as often as mothers do, and courts generally do not award what is not asked for in that regard.

A Massachusetts study examined 2,100 fathers who asked for custody and pushed aggressively to win it. Of those 2,100, 92 percent either received full or joint custody, with mothers receiving full custody only 7 percent of the time. Another study where 8 percent of fathers asked for custody showed that of that 8 percent, 79 percent received either sole or joint custody (in other words, approximately 6.3 percent of all fathers in the study)

Of course, this leads to the obvious question: Why do so few men attempt to gain custody? While there are multiple factors at play, one to note is that since many men still believe that the court system is inherently prejudiced in favor of the mother, they do not try to seek sole or joint custody, believing it to be a waste of time and money. This contributes to any lingering biases or claims that men care less about their children, which is, in fact, mostly untrue.
That is from here. When men push for custody, or joint custody, they are more likely to be granted it, and the rates have climbed in recent years.
This attitude is bizzare as all hell. Men vote against it, women vote for it, but somehow the onus is on the men to ruin their lives and somehow fix it without women losing the vote.

Its literally wanting to have your cake and eat it too.
You say it is our fault, and that this issue is us getting what we deserve, all because we 'broke apart' men's spaces. So in the end it's really about vindictiveness and spite. This issue also ignores class: rich, white liberal women do not suffer these policies, and never have. The working class does. You can argue the 'tough love' treatment will get women to realize these issues are a problem (as it has regarding the refugee crisis), but eventually it seems less like a motive of 'let them fight' to 'you deserve it, bitch.' This was the same attitude regarding that obese troon in the sorority that kept getting erections, even when the women actually didn't vote for him to be there - the administration put him there because of existing laws.

If you have daughters, then know this ruling affects them in more than just sports. You can blame adult women all you like, but its teenage girls that will suffer the most. The admission that things will be fixed if women lose the vote will also bite you back in the face, because it means more women will vote against you and support those policies out of spite.

Anna Slatz summed it up:
slatzism 2.PNG
slatzism.PNG

white women still lean far more democrat than white men do in these graphs, nearly five times more
holy shit
Lmao you clearly did not see the other parts of the graph. White women are the only ones to be split on the issue; all non whites go for Democrats. It is without question. Perhaps if you told blacks and Hispanics you will be taking away their right to vote and will be sending them back to their countries of origin, they might be spurred to vote the way you want, eh? If women are emotional creatures that can be swayed by anything and everything, it means you have failed to get women to vote the way you wanted.

This issue can't be laughed away by crying girls losing sports or getting their bones broken. It'll hit your small town like Oxy did, and it'll fuck it up worse than any drug will.
 
Lmao you clearly did not see the other parts of the graph. White women are the only ones to be split on the issue; all non whites go for Democrats. It is without question. Perhaps if you told blacks and Hispanics you will be taking away their right to vote and will be sending them back to their countries of origin, they might be spurred to vote the way you want, eh.
then there's no changing anything and we're all fucked
If women are emotional creatures that can be swayed by anything and everything, it means you have failed to get women to vote the way you wanted.
anything to save yourself from blame or responsibility
 
You say it is our fault, and that this issue is us getting what we deserve, all because we 'broke apart' men's spaces. So in the end it's really about vindictiveness and spite.
yes.png


Enjoy your meal.
You ordered it.
We warned you you'd get a stomach ache.
You had us dragged out by the bouncer.
You INSISTED you were capable of functioning as an adult, so we're treating you like one.
Fix your own problems. I'm going to lean back in my recliner and watch the bedlam.
 
Back