Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Stiffy]

Why is @Balldo's Gate such a contrarian prick? You secretly love Nick don't you boy?

 

[Pentamidine]

I'm not a lawyer but I went googling what would fall under "indirect contact" in the context of an HRO in Minnesota. I had a hard time finding MN specific stuff, but a recurring theme I kept running into was Social Media posts count specifically if made in such a way that the victim is likely to see them. Some sources said any Social Media posts about the victim at all. But given that, this to me seems like the most clear cut "This is definitely a violation" thing Nick has done so far



I say that because it's about Aaron, it's got Aaron tagged so he's more likely to see it, and it's made specifically to intimidate Aaron (with the threat of the lawfare). I think he'd be able to go to the Sheriff or the judge and in a good-faith and honest way present this and have it taken seriously.

 

[SaltyFanta]

View attachment 7580854
[ X / Archive ]
Despite being unambiguously told by the court not to indirectly contact Aaron, Nick Rekieta via his X.com @RekietaLaw account continues to make comments about him in tweet chains Aaron is tagged, which would cause Nick to appear in his notifications.

Oh boy! People tried to corral Nick into saying some unwise statements before he made his plea, but now they're going to try and farm violations by @'ing Aaron in replies to Nick. Considering his lack of impulse control, Nick is screwed.

Also, @Balldo's Gate, I wonder if you knew. Harman Smith constantly calls Baldur's Gate, Balldo's Gate ostensibly in honor of you. Maybe he even has an account here.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Why is @Balldo's Gate such a contrarian prick? You secretly love Nick don't you boy?

That is unnecessary, dissenting voices are valuable in protecting this thread from getting carried away.
Otherwise we'll end up with the legacy of threads like DSP or unhinged gorl world posters.

 

[Captain Manning]

DENIED.

Yeah. Sadly. He might be able to expand the conditions though. Especially if Nick decides to challenge the thing, and this goes to court.

The Harman Smith guy does give transformative commentary over the top of the Locals streams, or at least he did.

I just checked. He's not. He's got loud cicadas playing over the stream. It's really lame.

This is not difficult. Just say "OMG, what a faggot" every once in a while. The best thing is, because it's Nick, it would be the proper response for like 90% of anything Nick says anyways. You don't need to give a full blown academic response to Nick's streams or anything.

Why is @Balldo's Gate such a contrarian prick? You secretly love Nick don't you boy?

Not fair. He doesn't (though he does dislike Aaron perhaps more than most people here).

Look, I hate Nick with an absolute passion but... unfortunately... I think @Balldo's Gate is correct here. So is @Third World Aristocrat, who was the first to mention the discrepancy between the petition and the order. I agreed with TWA, and now BG is agreeing as well.

Nothing to get MATI over though. Nick quite probably still violated the damn thing anyways through the @s.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Why is @Balldo's Gate such a contrarian prick? You secretly love Nick don't you boy?

What exactly is he being contrarian about? When I read the HRO, I came to the same interpretation: Rekieta is prohibited from contacting Aaron, either directly or indirectly. There's nothing in the order that explicitly prevents him from talking about Aaron online.

However, Rekieta is currently in a precarious position, already on probation for a felony possession case. If he wants to toe the line of what might be considered indirect contact, that’s a very foolish game to play. And I’m quite certain that, even if it’s not ruled a violation of the HRO, it won’t do him any favors when he tries to overturn what might’ve otherwise been an easy win to have the order dismissed.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

What exactly is he being contrarian about? When I read the HRO, I came to the same interpretation: Rekieta is prohibited from contacting Aaron, either directly or indirectly. There's nothing in the order that explicitly prevents him from talking about Aaron online.

However, Rekieta is currently in a precarious position, already on probation for a felony possession case. If he wants to toe the line of what might be considered indirect contact, that’s a very foolish game to play. And I’m quite certain that, even if it’s not ruled a violation of the HRO, it won’t do him any favors when he tries to overturn what might’ve otherwise been an easy win to have the order dismissed.

"talking about Aaron online" in a way that is replayed or rebroadcast, and is promoted on twitter, and which reaches the ears or eyes of the protectee, violates the indirect contact rule the same way a billboard or fake advert in a swinger's website would, to use real examples. Or a closer example there is a case from MN itself that says much the same.
But really it's up to the County involved. Luckily for Rekieta since he is a normal boundary respecting heterosexual man with a family and a wife he will just move on with his life without mentioning this unfortunate bisexual dalliance any further. Right?

 

[Sneed Force One]

I'm very interested how Nick will defend against the porn history leak allegations. It doesn't look good either way.

He either actually did it, or will say Aaron left his credentials on his computer, which despite what Dabbleretards say, is still a CFAA violation.

Or he claims it's a hoax, in which he intentionally fabricated a false search history to humiliate and harass a victim.

Not a great sell either way. I hope we get to see more from the upcoming hearing, whenever that may be.

 

[Soapmore]

Or he claims it's a hoax, in which he intentionally fabricated a false search history to humiliate and harass a victim.

The part that downs him here, if he tried this argument, is that Aaron said the screenshots Melton showed of his business proposal was in fact a private document of his, that he zoomed in on it and the type and font match perfectly. So assuming Aaron is telling the truth about that, I hope Nick tries to make this argument, because I think Aaron can wreck it.

ETA: By mentioning all the above, I'm talking about a potential CFAA case, not the upcoming hearing. I doubt any of this would be germane to an HRO hearing, except tangentially, but IANAL.

 

[Smithfield Ham]

Is it true Patrick "the chomo" Melton got punched out and forced to leave by a bar owner or is that just a fantastical tale of things that should happen?

 

[Soapmore]

Is it true Patrick "the chomo" Melton got punched out and forced to leave by a bar owner or is that just a fantastical tale of things that should happen?

Rumor. Cheeto (bar owner) wanted them out, refused to sell his bar shwag to a 'pedo' and as I understand it, basically told them to leave.

 

[Not Even Twice]

Why is @Balldo's Gate such a contrarian prick? You secretly love Nick don't you boy?

Nah I don't think so. But for some reason he seems to dislike Aaron more than Nick.

 

[AnOminous]

He didn't even try to chat like a woman. The funniest thing is that Nick went for it :-)

Nick has trouble picking up on social cues. You know, totally subtle shit like being able to detect when a woman is obviously a dude even though everyone you know is telling you "she" has a cock.

 

[woodedbag]

I just keep going back to an example I gave earlier on the behavior Nick is displaying. If a woman leaves a man for another man, and he goes apeshit and she has to get a restraining order against him, and the guy proceeds to make a two hour rant on Facebook about the woman less than 24 hours later but just doesn't tag her in it, I would just assume police would intervene. I don't know that for certain, I'm not a lawyer, but at minimum balldo is walking on really thin ice here because he is giving off the same exact energy as what I just described.

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

I'm not a lawyer but I went googling what would fall under "indirect contact" in the context of an HRO in Minnesota. I had a hard time finding MN specific stuff, but a recurring theme I kept running into was Social Media posts count specifically if made in such a way that the victim is likely to see them.

That could be why he made the Aaron stream members only. That way he could try to argue it wouldn't be likely to be seen.

Except he knows the forum archives things, and that Aaron reads the threads regularly.

 

[Potentially Cat Mom]

I can’t believe a document drops and Sean isn’t explaining it to us on channel. Oh well. Time for some Italian ice cream.

 

[Sneed Force One]

That could be why he made the Aaron stream members only. That way he could try to argue it wouldn't be likely to be seen.

Except he knows the forum archives things, and that Aaron reads the threads regularly.

This could be a good argument. In Nick's leaked/fabricated search history photos. He included commentary that Aaron "looked at his thread and then jerked off".

He is perfectly aware Aaron frequents this thread and that we would archive Nick's streams.

If Nick argues that Aaron shouldn't go on Kiwifarms if he doesn't want to see videos about him. Aaron should deploy Kayla's alleged defence in her amended victim impact statement. "Why should I close my eyes because your client can't shut his mouth?" (Nick and Melton post-hearing interview last week)

 

[AnOminous]

I say that because it's about Aaron, it's got Aaron tagged so he's more likely to see it, and it's made specifically to intimidate Aaron (with the threat of the lawfare). I think he'd be able to go to the Sheriff or the judge and in a good-faith and honest way present this and have it taken seriously.

There's also a Minnesota case directly on point that an @ can be considered harassment that @Himedall All-seeing Waifu dug up:

https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/court-of-appeals/2017/a16-1544.html

That's exactly what Nick did, virtually within minutes of being served with an order telling him not to do that.

Is it true Patrick "the chomo" Melton got punched out and forced to leave by a bar owner or is that just a fantastical tale of things that should happen?

No, but according to secondhand accounts, he threw him out of his bar after calling him a pedophile to his face.

 

[thebigdream]

I'm putthg the hopium away for this one, Minnesota seems so unwilling to spank Nick's ass that an indirect mention on social media isn't going to spur them into acting. Aaron is the big bad domestic abuser here, don't ya know? Little Nicky couldn't hurt a fly.

 

[Brian Oblivion]

I don't really see how sending a tweet at someone is any different than texting or emailing them or even calling them on a landline phone. In all of these cases you aren't actually physically talking to them but rather sending them an electronic facsimile of your voice; it's clear that contacting someone=contacting someone no matter what electronic means you use to do it.