Nikocado Avocado / Nicholas Perry - (Formerly) Fat Faggot who cries because he eats and eats because he cries.

Birthday Dickpunch said:
Is it really a complicated concept? Like a lot of awful things, sexual assault is frequently committed by someone the victim knew and trusted. I've known more than one person with a story along the lines of letting a friend crash on their couch for the night and waking up to the "friend" taking off their pants or already further along. It's not always obvious that someone is actually a shitbag.

If Stephanie really was assaulted in her own home, it's understandable that she'd be more keen on having cameras rolling even while she's home.
Click to expand...

Let me break down why this is so weird to me.

1. She recorded a guest in her home without their knowledge. (One that she was already recording with for her youtube channel)
2. She then either watched that guest secretly from her bathroom and went back through security camera footage to watch.
3. Instead of addressing the issue of him "taking pictures" of her home (kitchen and living room), that is already mind you in footage of 100s of videos she herself recorded and uploaded to youtube for her millions of viewers. She also has multiple pictures of her house posted to the internet. She states she's afraid. (She also apparently knew he was taking the pictures because she's in some of them.)
4. To try and normalize her behavior she hides behind a story that she was sexually assaulted in an obviously scripted crocodile tear segment.
5. Nothing that happened had any relation to a sexual assault. She ate food with a fat fag and was upset that he brought up a private conversation that made her look bad.

It's in incredibly bad taste to record your guests and then secretly watch them through said recordings. That's downright creepy and if the genders were reversed, I would tell that guest to call the police as the person is an obvious creeper. That she looked through these recordings tells me she was looking specifically for things to use for drama purposes. That and her entire story is made up and nonsensical on every level. Sexual assault is a horrible thing that happens far too often, to bring it up during basic bitch drama just seems so wrong. This whole story has absolutely nothing to do with sexual assault, to hide behind that is gross and manipulative.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: I got rabies, Blatant hypocrite, Strine and 30 others
Perspicacity said:
1. She recorded a guest in her home without their knowledge. (One that she was already recording with for her youtube channel)
Click to expand...
He knew about their security system, though, and from what she described of his body language, he was looking for the cameras. So he knew perfectly well he was being recorded and also had to know he would be, by the security system, since he specifically had talked with Stephanie about the kind that she has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunslinger, nonbinary lesbian, Hellion and 8 others
XenomorphThot said:
He knew about their security system, though, and from what she described of his body language, he was looking for the cameras. So he knew perfectly well he was being recorded and also had to know he would be, by the security system, since he specifically had talked with Stephanie about the kind that she has.
Click to expand...
She already cited two party consent laws in California as a reason she won't release the footage. He clearly didn't know he was being recorded and obviously didn't consent to it. If he did consent/know about it it's in the footage and there would be no issue releasing it. Her story would make even less sense though. In both of those videos it's never stated by anyone that he knew he was being recorded by security cameras either, and trust me it gave me a headache listening to them I would remember. This girl is shady as hell.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: sylvanas, nonbinary lesbian, WickedlyWonderful and 8 others
Perspicacity said:
She already cited two party consent laws in California as a reason she won't release the footage. He clearly didn't know he was being recorded and obviously didn't consent to it. If he did consent/know about it it's in the footage and there would be no issue releasing it. Her story would make even less sense though. In both of those videos it's never stated by anyone that he knew he was being recorded by security cameras either, and trust me it gave me a headache listening to them I would remember. This girl is shady as hell.
Click to expand...
Dude if hes taking pictures of her security cameras then how fucking retarded does he have to be to not think he might be recorded?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mussi, Gunslinger, nonbinary lesbian and 14 others
From Zach Choi’s IG story
instagram.com

Zach (@zachchoi) • Instagram photos and videos

Zach has 219 posts on their Instagram profile. Follow their account to see all their photos and videos.
instagram.com instagram.com
5EBDDD07-3037-4FC6-90AF-8F4D6480D372.png4FB25314-8F53-455E-86C0-041A6F59B6E2.png7F027E0A-A781-45F6-A31B-97BE2650D0BB.png84B9F1E8-C605-49FD-B36A-5BCEEF605F3F.pngA88C2A76-F810-4FC0-93C7-90B872105C50.pngF8288814-526D-44B6-815E-86CE584FB49E.png88A140C9-E0CF-4B6D-9ACE-A5D976328145.png38622874-F811-41F2-9E31-66B1A6E67ABB.png6BBEAA11-2259-468A-B66B-151085D70FDC.png09837DDF-6EA3-4E09-9F51-065A45864794.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Gunslinger, nonbinary lesbian, HIVidaBoheme and 14 others
So what those screenshots tell me is that all of them are fucked and pieces of shit.

Nick, for being a drama whore and trying to stir the pot.

Stephanie for essentially using her past sexual assault as a way to emotionally manipulate her audience and making a big deal over fuck all.

And Zach for trying to play Switzerland when he had evidence that could have showed the Internet that Nick wasn't lying about Stephanie bringing up the Veronica drama first. And had proof that Nick was going to expose Stephanie yet didn't say anything either.

All of them are just awful.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Cardef1121, IDBigBootieBitcheZ, s0mbra and 18 others
(made a few edits for clarity)

pairaducks said:
If anybody wants to make a synopsis be my guest
Click to expand...

Nick accuses Stephanie of lying about Nick taking pictures of her home and security cameras while she was in the bathroom. Stephanie says, if you're going to accuse me of lying about that then give your consent for me to release the footage. I bet he won't.

Nick accuses Stephanie of lying/making him look bad about some dumb mukbang shit. Something about SS taking the last chicken wing while NA mean-mugged her? NA claimed it was planned, SS claimed it was aggression or something (I don't even know tbh). Zach gives Stephanie the unedited footage to prove she isn't lying. This is stupid and I don't really get what's going on but the footage does prove what Nick is saying happened, didn't happen.

Stephanie shares reconciliation texts between herself and Veronica (no one had seen these previously including Nick). Stephanie explains that this is what she was intending to talk about when she initially brought up Veronica to Nick (meaning she didn't want "drama" only wanted to talk about it in a positive way but then later changed her mind on even that). This part is around 14m and is worth watching, kind of.

Stephanie shows texts of Nick and says "this is from Christmas last year" (I assume she means Christmas 2018? Otherwise it makes no sense) and says Nick became obsessed with talking about Veronica. Stephanie says in the collab video Nick is still refusing to release, Nick talked obsessively about Veronica and grilled Stephanie which clearly made her uncomfortable. Stephanie urges Nick to release the footage if he feels he's so innocent and that Stephanie is overreacting.

Stephanie responds to petty accusation from Nick about Stephanie being "self serving" for wanting to do a mukbang collab with Keemi? Nick is looking really stupid in this. SS inserts clips of other mukbangers talking about how they like SS (this part is stupid, who cares?)

Nick in his attempts at defending himself had taken Zach's texts out of context and had posted them publicly without his consent. Stephanie did get Zach's consent and posts his texts in full. Zach says Nick told him he was intentionally going to avoid he topic of Veronica because he knew it would make Stephanie uncomfortable (which is obviously a lie).

She again shares the texts Nick sent her that night, but this time she has Zach's texts from the same time period for context. Right after Stephanie apologized for not getting back to Nick and for being "in and out of sleep" Nick immediately texted to Zach "I'm exposing her tonight" meanwhile he continue to beg Stephanie in texts to reschedule.

:stress: HOLY SHIT. Stephanie addresses her putting Nick's video with the #MeToo comment that he deleted in her original "I'm Scurred" video. The person Nick was talking about in that video reached out to Stephanie. They showed proof that they were the person Nick was ranting about in his video. This part is around 29m, worth watching. [edit: @Man vs persistent rat has clipped this part, a few posts down from mine]

Stephanie shows receipts from Karlee Steel disproving Nick's claims that she was unwanted and inserted herself into the mukbang collab. These receipts show that Nick was already chimping after only having been "ghosted" for 15 minutes. Petty shit no one cares.

Stephanie again implores Nick to release the footage where Nick interrogated her about Veronica, and to give consent for her to release her security camera footage. If he's accusing her of lying, why not release what he has, and consent for her to release what she has?

Stephanie defends petty shit Nick says about her merch, her sponsorships, her video tags, Nick claiming she told her fans to bully him, etc. She defends her merch. Yawn.

Thanks people for buying her charity merch. Evidently she put out some merch out of this drma and it's going to some anti-bully charity. The merch raised over 10K. That's nice sweaty.

Defends more hypocritical accusations from Nick such as "you uploaded monetized videos after the drama" when he did too. Explains they both had sponsorships and obligations, but he's the one accusing her of wrongdoing.

Ends by saying (paraphrasing) "There are three sides to every story, my side, his side and the truth. The truth is that mukbang he refuses to release and my security footage which he refuses to consent to me releasing."
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: pseudorandom, Aviva's Biotech-Breakdown, Gunslinger and 16 others
I don't really care about siding with either Nik or Steph, you're eating on camera for money, feel free to step of your high horse. Wouldn't surprise me if this drama was planned due to the overall toxicity of the youtube communities and the attention petty drama brings. What irks me though, is their way of handling whatever shit they have going on. I was hoping these hour-long ''exposing'' videos would've been left in 2019. If you have a problem with someone, maybe talk to them about the issue like a normal fucking adult before capitalizing it. These teen fandoms are ready to cancel anyone based on one narrative, which always is fabricated to make the one making the video look like a saint and the cancelled one made look like a horrible monster.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: pseudorandom, girlblogging, Hellion and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back