- Joined
- Jan 13, 2022
We've reached the level of unintentional self-parody

https://twitter.com/FinSniper22/status/1774168261564756388

https://twitter.com/FinSniper22/status/1774168261564756388
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

A lot of talk of war for someone not on the front lines
These are unserious people. I don’t know how you could go out in public with something so cringe and not feel an iota of shame.We've reached the level of unintentional self-parody
View attachment 5865309
https://twitter.com/FinSniper22/status/1774168261564756388
Pic incredibly related.A lot of talk of war for someone not on the front lines

Paid by Russia to state the obvious?
Who’s this “us”? None of these fags are doing anything to contribute to the war effort.
At least now there's a helpful self-identification to suckers who think Pekka Kallioniemi is anything but an info-laundry man for the Americans.
Let's not pretend the rapey asiatic hordes are somehow good guys because the people who support Ukraine are mind numbingly ********.It also works beautifully to ensure that those on the other side know what the stakes are to their side. Russian propaganda machine couldn't hope for a better bunch of idiots to prove that yes, they in-fact hate YOU and will do everything to ensure YOU and EVERYONE YOU KNOW is destroyed. Thus, people who might not like Putin have their hearts hardened and are now fully in the Z program because the alternative is having outsiders destroy Russia.
I hate to say it, but the NAFOtard may be right this time. Hamas has been known to use Geneva-protected objects (hospitals, mosques, ambulances, etc.) as part of their staging grounds and mobility tools since they know that blowing them up will be declared a war crime. Doesn't help that the earliest reports tend to come from Hamas propagandists claiming the “atrocity” was worse than it was and concealing their own misdeeds, like when they tried to claim the IDF bombed a hospital before it was revealed that the explosion came from a munitions misfire in the building.This is some next level victim blaming in response to that AID worker bombing you may've heard about.
View attachment 5884074
If a combatant is hiding behind an innocent bystander, you don't shoot through the bystander and to do so would be a war crime. Israel had no justification for bombing three separate cars that were clearly marked as humanitarian aid. I have no love for the Palestinians but Israel should be considered a rogue state at this point.I hate to say it, but the NAFOtard may be right this time. Hamas has been known to use Geneva-protected objects (hospitals, mosques, ambulances, etc.) as part of their staging grounds and mobility tools since they know that blowing them up will be declared a war crime. Doesn't help that the earliest reports tend to come from Hamas propagandists claiming the “atrocity” was worse than it was and concealing their own misdeeds, like when they tried to claim the IDF bombed a hospital before it was revealed that the explosion came from a munitions misfire in the building.
Fog of war is nasty, and the Arab-Israeli slap fights are always particularly bad about it.
You are either painfully naive or outright running interference for a genocidal terrorist group because they oppose “da joos.” Collateral damage is a long-standing reality of any sort of combat engagement with bystanders involved, and most hostage response doctrines state that shooting through the hostage is acceptable once active violence begins (even medium-security prisons will tell you that they don't give a fuck about protecting hostages if it means preventing an escape). That's assuming that there were even bystanders involved in these incidences: deliberately using protected markings while engaging in military actions is itself a war crime, and any protections are lost to those involved. Joining up with terrorists and then claiming you're just “innocent civilians” when somebody shoots back at you is a classic part of terrorist playbook, especially when we're talking about foreign recruits engaging in false-flag operations.If a combatant is hiding behind an innocent bystander, you don't shoot through the bystander and to do so would be a war crime. Israel had no justification for bombing three separate cars that were clearly marked as humanitarian aid. I have no love for the Palestinians but Israel should be considered a rogue state at this point.
That particular dog shows up a lot. I think he's on a payroll.MAGABoomer makes a fucking hilarious joke. I chuckled.
View attachment 5886242
Then the dog fuckers show up.
View attachment 5886244
Then the fat titted Mexican NAFO "mexic0la_" decides to open her cock holster, and then her NAFO simps join in.
View attachment 5886245
How much spackle do you think is caked on her face?
View attachment 5886250
People make fun of Trump for being Orange Man. Have we finally found Orange Woman to begin the new Orange Race?How much spackle do you think is caked on her face?
The one running interference for a genocidal terrorist group is you. Bombing aid trucks isn't collateral damage, there were no combatants in the vicinity. Israel has even admitted this. You are clearly not familiar with the laws of armed conflict, hostage response doctrine, or even the details of the recent strikes.You are either painfully naive or outright running interference for a genocidal terrorist group because they oppose “da joos.” Collateral damage is a long-standing reality of any sort of combat engagement with bystanders involved, and most hostage response doctrines state that shooting through the hostage is acceptable once active violence begins (even medium-security prisons will tell you that they don't give a fuck about protecting hostages if it means preventing an escape). That's assuming that there were even bystanders involved in these incidences: deliberately using protected markings while engaging in military actions is itself a war crime, and any protections are lost to those involved. Joining up with terrorists and then claiming you're just “innocent civilians” when somebody shoots back at you is a classic part of terrorist playbook, especially when we're talking about foreign recruits engaging in false-flag operations.