Disaster NPR shocks by airing audio of woman getting an abortion: 'Disturbing and evil on every level' - NPR correspondent notes 'soothing music' playing, says it feels 'like a childbirth'

By Brian Flood | Fox News
Published November 3, 2022 4:26pm EDT

NPR shocked social media on Thursday when it aired audio of a Michigan woman having an abortion.

The 11-minute segment noted that women have been traveling to Michigan in "record numbers" in search of abortions since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade earlier this year. The polarizing issue is on the ballot when Michiganders head out to vote on Election Day, and NPR dispatched journalist Kate Wells to an abortion clinic outside Detroit to observe procedures and talk to patients.

Along the way, Wells met a woman who decided to terminate a pregnancy and allowed NPR to record the audio. The woman had her abortion at "about 11 weeks," according to Wells, who put a spotlight on the dim lighting and "soothing music" that she claimed makes it feel "a lot like a childbirth."

1667513904472.png
A group of anti-abortion protesters crashes the Women's March Action Rally for Reproductive Rights at Mariachi Plaza in Los Angeles, California, on Oct. 8, 2022. ( DAVID MCNEW / AFP) (Photo by DAVID MCNEW/AFP via Getty Images)

Listeners were told the woman would be "partially awake," and the sound of a machine could be heard terminating her pregnancy as a staffer named Brandy consoled the distraught woman. At one point, the woman says the cramps as it's happening are to painful.

"Within just a couple of minutes, it’s over," Wells told listeners as the woman moaned.

"You did it," Brandy said. "You did great."

Conservative strategist Greg Price hesitantly shared a clip of NPR’s audio, which quickly went viral and outraged conservatives.

"I almost didn't want to tweet this but it's something everyone needs to know. NPR on the radio this morning played audio of a woman getting an abortion. You can hear the vacuum turning on, crying, moaning, and the doctor telling her it's done. Warning: It's tough to listen to," Price wrote with the accompanying audio.

"The left always talks in euphemisms when it comes to abortion. ‘Choice,’ ‘reproductive care,’ etc. But this clip puts on full display what an abortion actually is: violence and full on dehumanization of the unborn. That's why it's important to share. To show reality," Price wrote in a follow-up tweet.

"So listen to that audio. It's incredibly tough but it's important," he added. "Listen to it and then think to yourself about how the only pitch the Democrat Party is making to the voters in the midterm election is more of that."

1667513956158.png
NPR shocked listeners on Thursday when it aired audio of a Michigan woman having an abortion. (Jon Cherry/Getty Images)

Many on the right questioned NPR's decision and whether it would backfire, while others were simply disgusted.

"Hard to imagine what NPR was thinking with this. But pro-life ads have often been taken down or rejected for showing how horrific an abortion process is. If NPR's goal was to normalize abortions, it seems like this chilling segment might have the opposite impact," GOP communications flack Matt Whitlock wrote.

NPR did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

"This is disturbing and evil on every level," the conservative Media Research Center tweeted.

1667513981146.png
McKayla Wolff left and Karen Wolff, joined hands as they rallied for abortion rights at the capitol in St. Paul, Minn., on Sunday July 17, 2022. (Jerry Holt/Star Tribune via Getty Images) (Jerry Holt/Star Tribune)

"I couldn’t bring myself to listen to it. This is not mercy," author Helen Raleigh wrote.

"So disturbing," author Chadwich Moore responded while the Young America's Foundation responded simply, "Gross."

Popular Twitter account Libs of TikTok called it "demonic," and journalist Bethany Mandel refused to listen.

"I’m going to caveat this tweet with the fact that I am have not and will not listen to it. But this kind of tactic, showing Americans the reality of abortion, might really backfire," Mandel responded.

Fox News Radio’s Guy Benson called it "stomach-turning" and Daily Caller’s Nicole Silverio called it "heart wrenching."

Source (Archive)

1667514098437.png

1667514118357.png
Source (Archive)
 
I am completely desensitized. I often frequent the people dying thread here and I can look at photos of rotten corpses in any stage of decomposition without batting an eye. Yet hearing about fetuses being terminated, being cut up and vacuumed out, and about how terminated fetus material is a commodity to be bought and sold absolutely makes my skin crawl.

I think it's just the blatant disregard for human life that makes me sick. Something which every one of us starts out as is often seen to be equal to that of a cockroach. Just an pest in need of extermination.

I'm not necessarily against it as there are times when it needs to be done. It's just the crassness and celebratory aspects of this culture around it is absolutely disgusting.
 
Last edited:
That's primarily because, "I think that's a baby, we shouldn't kill it", is an incredibly difficult argument to go against. So they try to reframe it instead, to "you want to murder/enslave women", so they can have a moral high ground rather than try to argue for baby-killing.
"You want to murder/enslave women" is oldtimey feminists' argument against abortion.

"I think that's a baby, we shouldn't kill it" is a very easy argument to go against. Pick either or both:
  • "it's not a baby"
  • "I do not owe it the use of my organs"
"I think that's a baby" is an argument from faith, preaching to the choir, it doesn't convince anyone, it just makes people already on your side to nod approvingly. You don't have to compromise on your faith but you should be able to derive a sound secular/utilitarian conclusion and field that against opponents.

I have a question. If you believe that abortion is murder, should a women be charged with first degree murder if she were to have one?
  • I don't believe abortion is murder,
  • but I do believe it's a killing, as life starts at conception, and
  • it should be banned to benefit women's rights,
  • with exceptions for rape, incest, increased risk to health of mother, and tard babies,
  • and, absent these exceptions, it should still be banned in first-world countries, as the harm done to victims morally entitled to an exception is outweighed by
    • the vilification of parenthood and
    • reframing whores' convenience as all women's rights.
A woman who has an abortion should not be charged with anything.

---
With regards to the audio, it's completely retarded on part of NPR, as it gives ammo to pro-lifers and has no effect on pro-abortionists.
 
A woman who has an abortion should not be charged with anything.
Why not? Someone who kills a pregnant women is charged with double homicide, what gives women the free pass?

If it's a case where because the women isn't the one performing it should the doctor be charged with murder and the women with accessory the same as if someone were to hire a hitman?
 
There was actually a similar video that was played widely in schools in the 80s called The Silent Scream. Plus it's not anywhere near the most evil thing, have you ever read what serial killers have done to their victims? Are you a gen z or alpha? Were you born yesterday?

Bleeding heart.

You don't understand. God loves niggers.
Lmfao I remember Silent Scream. We had to watch it during religion class when we were like 10 or something. But then we also had to watch a woman giving birth during biology class. I'd say it evened things out.

I wouldn't be surprised if that video was played in some schools in uber catholic areas of Poland until today.

Also, that VHS cover, "from the victim point of view" :story:

The Silent Scream (1984 film).jpg


2178.jpg
 
Last edited:
Instead, it's a normal procedure, quick, painless with a doctor reassuring patient everything went ok.

That's why it should terrify you, you fucking soulless monster.

Imagine if this was an actual murder. 'I don't get what the problem here is. The victim was gagged and didn't make a noise. She was high off her tits on barbituates anyway, so she definitely didn't feel any pain. The bullet was a .45 caliber hydro-shock hollow-point, so it would have taken less than 0.05 seconds for the centers of the brain capable of cognitive awareness to be shredded into hamburger. I just don't understand why people are upset about this. He even whispered to her that God was waiting before pulling the trigger. People are fucking retards for caring about this.'
 
What am I supposed to be horrified at here? Two minutes of grunts and vacuum cleaner sounds?

To the God-fearing folks here (lol): Old Testament gives you a free pass to kill your kids if they're being a disrespectful shit towards you. Please don't use God as an "abortion is child killing" argument. Also, compare the screams and begs for mercy in the Dagestan Massacre video with the sounds in the abortion video ITT; if you think they're remotely comparable and equally murderous, you're out of your mind.

Also, if you want abortion then please don't charge men with alimony. Why do women can abort a fetus if they change their mind but men are fucked financially for 25 years if their wife turns out to be a harpy when married with children?
 
Also, compare the screams and begs for mercy in the Dagestan Massacre video with the sounds in the abortion video ITT; if you think they're remotely comparable and equally murderous, you're out of your mind.

'Murder is perfectly acceptable when it is clean, sterile and intentionally designed not to trigger my instinctual moral understanding that what is being done is wrong.'
 
@demicolon Please explain how food relates to infanticide. I'm a simple farmer who doesn't understand the nuances of your argument.
Calf are infants, thus killing them is infanticide.
A fetus is not an infant, thus aborting it doesn't really fit into the definition of infanticide.

You can call animals "food" and argue they're not equal to humans, but I can call unborn children "fetuses" and argue they're not equal to a born human infant, too.

In a world where billions of living, feeling creatures are living in nightmarish conditions and enduring mind-boggling agony before getting turned into food (or just skinned alive for fur), I find it absurdly humorous you care so much about a fetus which doesn't even have a brain or personality yet and thus can't really feel any pain of abortion.

Personally I care more about practical implications of abortion/anti-abortion like mother's homeostasis after aborting or stem cell research than all that moral blah blah.
 
Calf are infants, thus killing them is infanticide.
A fetus is not an infant, thus aborting it doesn't really fit into the definition of infanticide.

You can call animals "food" and argue they're not equal to humans, but I can call unborn children "fetuses" and argue they're not equal to a born human infant, too.

In a world where billions of living, feeling creatures are living in nightmarish conditions and enduring mind-boggling agony before getting turned into food (or just skinned alive for fur), I find it absurdly humorous you care so much about a fetus which doesn't even have a brain or personality yet and thus can't really feel any pain of abortion.

Personally I care more about practical implications of abortion/anti-abortion like mother's homeostasis after aborting or stem cell research than all that moral blah blah.
Animals are food. I grew up in the millennial drought, most of what we ate was roos we shot and rabbits we trapped. Your attitude towards food is one born out of never lacking for food.

>"unborn children are "fetuses""
>unborn children
>children

Little bit of a gaff there mate. Never fear though, I'll impregnate you and you can raise our children on our pristine alpine farm. Yours is a bright future where you are barefoot and pregnant in our cozy kitchen.
 
Animals are food. I grew up in the millennial drought, most of what we ate was roos we shot and rabbits we trapped. Your attitude towards food is one born out of never lacking for food.
Long pig
>"unborn children are "fetuses""
>unborn children
>children

Little bit of a gaff there mate. Never fear though, I'll impregnate you and you can raise our children on our pristine alpine farm. Yours is a bright future where you are barefoot and pregnant in our cozy kitchen.
Mpreg?
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: byuuWasTaken
As an adult, unless you mean to tell me that it's likely that a child would be a drunkard.
If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and who, when they have chastened him, will not heed them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city, to the gate of his city. And they shall say to the elders of his city, “This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.” Then all the men of his city shall stone him to death with stones; so you shall put away the evil from among you, and all Israel shall hear and fear.

Deuteronomy 21:18–21
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: byuuWasTaken
If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and who, when they have chastened him, will not heed them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city, to the gate of his city. And they shall say to the elders of his city, “This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.” Then all the men of his city shall stone him to death with stones; so you shall put away the evil from among you, and all Israel shall hear and fear.

Deuteronomy 21:18–21
Again: do you mean to tell me that a child would be a drunkard?
 
Back