Null is out of touch with women

[gang weeder]

Hilariously women earned the right to vote in Burgerland much earlier than the 19th, in California. In the first election in US history where women were allowed to vote, they all voted to repeal their own right to vote.

Well shit I didn't know that. Maybe there is hope after all. C'mon ladies, you've done it once, you can do it again!

 

[DavidS877]

Why is there wifi in the kitchen?

How else is she going to look up recipies?

 

[Some Dumb Faggot]

What you're noticing is that TERFs are, at the end of the day, still radical feminists. The alliance between sane people and TERFs was always going to end at some point.

Also, troonism really is that bad. Partially because it's spreading like cancer among kids, but also because it's ridiculous on its face and should be easy to defeat. The fact that we, in the Western world, can't do that is a sign some thing's deeply wrong with the Western mind and spirit.

He was a Troon on HRTs, that's why he hated women and was defending Troons. He probably 41%'ed himself.

 

[Need for Sped]

^ this is kind of what you sound like when you say that the way to get women to vote Republican is to double down on all of the behaviors and values that ploished women out of the party back in 2016.

Tale as old as fucking time: Women do X, X results in Y, women try to retcon reality by claiming "Well, I wouldn't have made X if you hadn't made Y to begin with"

Go back to 2013, where there were no Trump, Fuentes, Tate or whoever else you want, and you'll find that every major ingredient for this shit stew was already there: High profile false rape accusations (That were swiftly memory holed once they served their purpose), college brainwashing people with CRT, misandry, abortion being glorified by feminists to almost sacramental levels, to name a few. All Trump or Tate did was merely acting as a vector for a backlash that was already brewing for years, if not more (Hell, for the record, anything I've heard Tate say was already old hat more than a decade ago, the fucker doesn't have a single original thought).
And while we're with Tate, same thing. If the nuclear family hadn't been fucking broken by the ridiculous divorce laws, with the fathers being pushed out of their homes and kids lives; how many young man do you think would have latched to someone like Tate?

I think the fine point of weak men and feminism is that there's a nuance to taking control of a woman. I'm not of te incel creed where we need to keep women dumb and out of public life like some Muslim caliphate. That's ludicrous and it hurts both genders without fixing anything. I say that we should let women keep their rights as well as have men assert control over their environment by keeping men educated and empowering men to call women on their bullshit. Men need to relearn and regain the ability to be authoritative and advance themselves in the social sphere without fear of losing their credit to slander. Take this step and properly educate both of the sexes and we could rebalance the sexes.

That's all well and good, until you get slapped with a false rape accusation or get torn apart in a lopsided divorce court. Until change gets enacted so that women do not get incentivized to weaponize the legal system against men while suffering no consequences of their own, I'm afraid nothing will change.

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

You are known for creating a "man hate" thread.

With the amount of wanker retardation here, we might need an entire manhate subforum for the gurlz.

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

Maybe if women stopped voting blue no matter who then people on the right wouldn't see them as political enemies?

They didn't use to. Margaret Thatcher was a Conservative and a woman. Women used to vote to the right of men by a little bit, at least in Europe.

But with the current level of spastic rightoid fear of women, I can kind of see why many women feel politically homeless.

 

[Lurker]

all of this because null has a reasonable view about women and isn't an insufferable incel

 

[Lidl Drip]

You are known for creating a "man hate" thread.

 

[AgendaPoster]

Margaret Thatcher was a Conservative and a woman.

This was an even dumber sentence than your demand for a man hate subforum.
You people are lunatics and your opinions are worth nothing.
Imagine thinking Thatcher was "conservative" in any way.
Anyway bring on the whole subforum, but let it be open to males, and we'll manage just fine, rest assured.

 

[Shadfan666xxx000]

Remember, the United States went for well over 100 years without women voting, and everything still worked just fine. I agree that removing women's right to vote is probably not going to happen anytime soon and completely unrealistic for the foreseeable future. But observable history proves that it wouldn't somehow ruin the country or have any sort of big negative consequences.

I think it would. Just because we could do well without them voting doesn't mean we want to set the precedent that we can start rescinded voting rights. That could lead into the argument that you need an arbitrary amount of property or education to vote as well which would greatly hinder the public in terms of being able to participate.

That's all well and good, until you get slapped with a false rape accusation or get torn apart in a lopsided divorce court. Until change gets enacted so that women do not get incentivized to weaponize the legal system against men while suffering no consequences of their own, I'm afraid nothing will change.

That's literally what I just argued against. Abuse and cheating are fine grounds to end a marriage and an employee should have recourse if theyre accused of something in the workplace but neither should lead to an automatic death sentence. What youre bringing up at this point is alimony which should be reworked as well.

 

[Lurker]

This was an even dumber sentence than your demand for a man hate subforum.
You people are lunatics and your opinions are worth nothing.

um, obviously we're just joking in the manhate thread about hating men, just like men joke all the time about assaulting, raping, or killing women.

it's just a joke, y u haff to be mad?

 

[WelperHelper99]

all of this because null has a reasonable view about women and isn't an insufferable incel

Actually tho. The responses are unhinged. Guys, he just stated his opinion that has ZERO bearing on your life. I guess half the site has to riot now, billions must die

 

[Quindoll]

Just glad this topic is always bringing up the tensions. 25 pages and counting.

 

[Lurker]

Guys, he just stated his opinion that has ZERO bearing on your life.

excuse me, my parasocial relationship with daddy nool has been completely destroyed because he thinks women should be treated like people with feelings.

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

Imagine thinking Thatcher was "conservative" in any way.

Thats what most people believe. But even if she wasn't, she managed to get women to vote for the right leaning of two options. Maybe it helps that she wasn't a fornicating pig like Trump, a trafficking mohammedan pimp like Tate, or a spineless opportunist like Boris Johnson.

If conservatives wants to appeal to women, maybe they should seek to curb the spread of porno everywhere. That would also be a Conservative position. But I fear that most conservatards simply are too stupid.

 

[AgendaPoster]

Maybe it helps that she wasn't a fornicating pig like Trump, a trafficking mohammedan pimp like Tate, or a spineless opportunist like Boris Johnson.

That much is true.
Blumpf is a shitlib from the 90s, Tate is a criminal and Boris is useless.
That we can agree on.
Thatcher was an abominable neocon capitalist sperg though and she did NOTHING socially right wing in her career.

it's just a joke, y u haff to be mad?

I don't trust them the same way most women don't trust males.

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

I don't trust them the same way most women don't trust males.

You should. Women are amazing. My life would be a million times worse without the incredible women in it.

 

[Shadfan666xxx000]

Thats what most people believe. But even if she wasn't, she managed to get women to vote for the right leaning of two options. Maybe it helps that she wasn't a fornicating pig like Trump, a trafficking mohammedan pimp like Tate, or a spineless opportunist like Boris Johnson.

If conservatives wants to appeal to women, maybe they should seek to curb the spread of porno everywhere. That would also be a Conservative position. But I fear that most conservatards simply are too stupid.

You say that but the opposition isn't nearly as squeaky clean as you imply. Biden is corrupt and senile, Tate is under siege by wokescolds, and Johnson is only opposed by other spineless opportunists.

 

[SwanSwanson]

View attachment 5673816

You don't have the right to complain about a woman hate thread then.

 

[AgendaPoster]

You should. Women are amazing. My life would be a million times worse without the incredible women in it.

Trusting an entire sex group is pure idiocy.
Trust is built at an individual level. "Believe women" has the same value as "believe men", i.e. ZERO.
Distrust is the default for all relations with unknown people, men or women.