Null is out of touch with women

It’s truly impossible to please with this stance. If women were forcibly drafted as well, men would still complain that the military is being weakened and that it’s putting others in danger.
I told you before that this is the ultimatum that you out yourselves in, before men wouldn’t even have this discussion because to them it’s obvious what the answer is. You wanted to join the military at the behest of the crusty old white men you hated, it was opened up to you under the Obama admin that you voted for, lowered the bar of the military and made it weak to pander to you, and now you’re crying that you’re being sent off to die when men were fine fighting for women back home for all of history before then. The draft only shows the lack of principle in wanting to participate in men’s roles: you want the valor of serving in the military but want a back door for when shit gets tough that isn’t available to your male counterparts.
 
You wanted to join the military at the behest of the crusty old white men you hated, it was opened up to you under the Obama admin that you voted for
How old do you think I am lol. I was 12 when Obama was elected president.
lowered the bar of the military and made it weak to pander to you, and now you’re crying that you’re being sent off to die when men were fine fighting for women back home for all of history before then.
Also too young to have had any say in that.
The draft only shows the lack of principle in wanting to participate in men’s roles: you want the valor of serving in the military but want a back door for when shit gets tough that isn’t available to your male counterparts.
Even when only men could vote, they managed to get us presidents like James Buchanan, who had a big role in instigating the Civil War. Based on this, men should vote more responsibly.
 
How old do you think I am lol. I was 12 when Obama was elected president.

Also too young to have had any say in that.
What is the Royal “You”

Even when only men could vote, they managed to get us presidents like James Buchanan, who had a big role in instigating the Civil War. Based on this, men should vote more responsibly.
Complete non- sequitur, men voted for a war they wanted to participate in?
 
It’s truly impossible to please with this stance. If women were forcibly drafted as well, men would still complain that the military is being weakened and that it’s putting others in danger.
My solution is simple: women only units that will put no men in danger.

Even when only men could vote, they managed to get us presidents like James Buchanan, who had a big role in instigating the Civil War. Based on this, men should vote more responsibly.
And when men fucked up they payed the price. That's what you don't seem to understand: voting for men isn't a right but a responsibility that can get turned into a burden real quick
1674301162676967.png
IMG_9153.JPG
 
Also, demographically, it’s dumb to draft women because a shortage of women is way more likely to lead to a population crash than a shortage of men.
If men can decide that, then they can decide women are to be subservient too.
To further explain, the view of The Woman as a fragile, to be protected, precious entity, is fine by me, but at the same time, you WILL behave like a lady, will listen to your father, will marry who the family decides you will marry, and spend your life in literary pursuits of beauty and children rearing.
 
Feminism? The same one that asserted that men and women are interchangeable and shockingly led to men and women switching roles to unnatural extremes.
Not a feminist. Complimentarian where I believe men and women are both different, and offer different things. It doesn’t place men above women either, or vice versa, but it doesn’t ignore the biological limitations of men and women. Intellectually, men and women are roughly the same, so prohibiting women from voting based on that doesn’t work with me. Physically, men and women are different, and therefore will not have the same professions.
 
Not a feminist. Complimentarian where I believe men and women are both different, and offer different things. It doesn’t place men above women either, or vice versa, but it doesn’t ignore the biological limitations of men and women. Intellectually, men and women are roughly the same, so prohibiting women from voting based on that doesn’t work with me. Physically, men and women are different, and therefore will not have the same professions.
Then why do you think it’s unfair to assert if someone is eligible to fight they should be included in the draft? I don’t think women should be included in either, but if they assert that then it’s only fair.
 
Feminism? The same one that asserted that men and women are interchangeable and shockingly led to men and women switching roles to unnatural extremes.
Maybe you can ask one of the nice ladies from your University to explain what feminism is to you, because you clearly don't have a clue.
 
Then why do you think it’s unfair to assert if someone is eligible to fight they should be included in the draft? I don’t think women should be included in either, but if they assert that then it’s only fair.
Clearly, the decision for women to be able to vote in the 20th century wasn’t about ability to fight.
"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
This is the actual transcript of the 19th amendment. Nowhere is there a caveat that women are obligated to fight in order to vote.
 
Clearly, the decision for women to be able to vote in the 20th century wasn’t about ability to fight.

This is the actual transcript of the 19th amendment. Nowhere is there a caveat that women are obligated to fight in order to vote.
Okay? I’m talking about participating in the military. You seem to think women make for horrible soldiers, so why should they participate at all?
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: JambledUpWords
Back