Disaster NYPD to have only 29K cops by 2025 due to new NYC budget cuts

Article
Archive

The NYPD’s force will be reduced to just 29,000 cops by the end of fiscal year 2025 — the lowest level since the mid-90s — amid a slew of city-wide budget cuts revealed by Mayor Eric Adams Thursday as the Big Apple grapples with its multi-billion-dollar migrant crisis.

Under City Hall’s newly unveiled updated 2023 financial plan, the next five police academy classes will be axed — essentially decimating an already strained department as roughly 4,500 officers are expected to leave their ranks within the next 18 months.

Firefighters are also in the firing line with FDNY members who are on “long-term light duties” — meaning they’ve been injured on the job or are out sick — being forced into early retirement or fired under the plan.

“The defund the police crowd’s woke dream has come true. We were fed a line of BS that the wave of migrants would be a benefit to the city. Now we are defunding the police to pay for their beds,” Council Republican Minority Leader, Joe Borelli, raged.

President of the FDNY’s union Andrew Ansbro, too, slammed the sweeping budget reductions, arguing the Adams administration “should have taken a different approach with the life-saving agencies like the FDNY and NYPD, which could really affect safety in New York City.”

“Our job being dangerous, we have lot of members who getting physical injured … now they are being pushed out the door to early retirement when they have a lot to offer. They are cutting back on people who really help the safety of FDNY and residents of New York City,” he added.

In total, the NYPD’s budget of $5.6 billion will cut by $132 million next fiscal year with the axing of new academy classes over the next year and a half clawing back roughly $42 million.

Hizzoner’s push to shrink the department comes despite the centerpiece of his 2021 mayoral campaign being the need to bolster public safety. The NYPD’s staffing levels last fell below 29,000 back in 1993, according to city records.

“This is truly a disaster for every New Yorker who cares about safe streets. Cops are already stretched to our breaking point, and these cuts will return us to staffing levels we haven’t seen since the crime epidemic of the ’80s and ’90s. We cannot go back there,” Police Benevolent Association president, Patrick Hendry, told The Post.

The FDNY’s budget, meanwhile, will be slashed by $74 million, City Hall’s plan shows. It not clear exactly how many on light duty will be let go, but there are normally between 800 and 1,000 on such duty at a time.

In addition to the NYPD and FDNY’s staffing cuts, the Department of Education will eliminate $547 million from its 2024 fiscal budget — with most savings coming from getting rid of jobs that have yet to be filled, as well as reducing after school program seats by just over 3,500.

The Sanitation Department, whose budget cuts will total $32 million next fiscal year, will see its lot cleaning unit completely disbanded and a reduction in litter basket services near parks, greenways and bridges.

Adams is also reducing the number of street garbage cans in the outer boroughs so high-traffic areas in Manhattan don’t suffer a reduction in pick ups.

Meanwhile, a total of 34 popular cultural institutions, including the Metropolitan Museum of Art and Museum of Natural History, will have reduced funding with the city’s Cultural Institutions Group having its budget axed by $5.83 million.

And migrant costs are set to slashed by 20%, in part, by reducing staffing and services, though the exact details weren’t immediately clear.

Under the budget plan, savings will also come from hiring freezes being implemented at the Law Department, DOE, FDNY and Sanitation civilian employees, the Department of Aging, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, and the Parks Department.

Despite the glaring cuts, Hizzoner — whose office only took a $8,000 hit for travel allowance this year — still hailed his plan and claimed it would have “minimal disruption” to city-wide services.

“To balance the budget as the law requires, every city agency dug into their own budget to find savings, with minimal disruption to services,” Adams said in a statement.

“And while we pulled it off this time, make no mistake: Migrant costs are going up, tax revenue growth is slowing, and COVID stimulus funding is drying up.”

The City Council approved the 2023 budget back in June but it failed to account for the rising costs of the migrants crisis. The changes to this fiscal year’s budget, which ends June 30, 2024, will go to the council next week for approval.

The 2024 fiscal year budget will total $110.5 billion, Adams said — $3.4 billion more than the current budget.

Still, the Citizens Budget Commission watchdog group warned the Big Apple still faces billions of dollars in gaps in subsequent years — despite the spending reductions to balance this year’s budget. The group estimates the fiscal year 2025 gap will widen to $7.1 billion, up from the previously estimated $5.1 billion.

The fresh cuts are in response to Adams forcing all city departments to find an initial 5% to slash from their budgets in a bid to combat the ever-growing costs of the migrant crisis, which he has estimated to set the city back $12 billion over the next three fiscal years.

Hizzoner has already warned an additional two cuts, totaling 10%, might be on the cards too as the crisis escalates.

But the city’s Public Advocate, Jumanne Williams, was among those to rail against the Adams administration’s plan on Thursday, arguing the crisis isn’t solely to blame and that revenue raising options should be considered before widespread cuts to services.

“These cuts aren’t abstract, and do real harm to our systems of government and New Yorkers relying on those services. While there is a clear and urgent need for additional funding and resources from the state and federal government, the mayor should come to the table with a scalpel instead of cuts across the board,” he said.

“He should also reconsider the administration’s annual opposition to supporting common sense revenue raising options that ensure the city can continue to uphold its fiscal responsibility and moral responsibility at the same time.”
 
At the grassroots level, most Americans are too timid because we are far too over-policed.

Defunding the police means taking justice back into the hands of the majority. That means no more crap like trannies like Bill talking to kids in schools. You guys should be jumping for joy at the implications of less police-state.
 
At the grassroots level, most Americans are too timid because we are far too over-policed.

Defunding the police means taking justice back into the hands of the majority. That means no more crap like trannies like Bill talking to kids in schools. You guys should be jumping for joy at the implications of less police-state.
Unfortunately, when someone like Kyle Rittenhouse or Daniel Perry steps up to the plate, crooked prosecutors try to have their scalps.

"Defund the Police" is just a pretext for anarcho-tyrants to commandeer the police. Lolbergtarianism has never worked once. You need Right-Wing cops who will protect the rights of the Decent Many and beat the shit out of the Worthless Few.

You cannot coexist with people who want you dead. There is no liberty in the future. The best we can hope for is a powerful state under the control of the based.

I know that's mean, I know it's unfair, I know it's hypocritical. But there's no place for such niceties when you are up against an existential threat.

It's not enough to say "Don't Tread On Me"; you have to either Tread or Be Tread Upon. Conquer, or be conquered. Crush, or be crushed. Win, or go exinct. In politics, the meek shall inherit nothing.

Society needs tardwranglers. Sorry if that offends your lolberg sensibilities, but the side that wants to "just be left alone" will ALWAYS lose to the side that wants to win. You cannot use "muh rights" against a faction that has no qualms about sending death squads after fat, crippled old men who talk shit about them.

So don't come crying to me when you are hauled off to the gas chambers. I'll be sure to have "Imagine If Things Were Reversed!" engraved on your tombstone. Loser.
 
Last edited:
Its really funny how suddenly now immigrants are in fact a huge economic and financial situation for any community, but only if they don't happen on the southern border. Of all cities that should be eager for it, it really should be the one with the literal giant world wonder statue asking for more of them. By all accounts, you should be turning them into massive economic wins within 2-5 years right? Problem solved by then.

Over in the real world, every other city in the nation is probably ramping up their advertising on how nice and safe their cities are for rich people and wealthy businesses looking to relocate them, their businesses, and their more valuable employees. The only business that really needs to stay in NYC right now is high frequency stock trading, which is machine performed, hardware just needs to be on site. Wall Street will become a more literal name than ever as a Private Security firm makes a killing, and everyone else will fuck off and leave as conditions continue to degrade.

The real question is where the breaking point will be for the normal folks. Nobody is gonna go full right wing conservative swing NYC, but they do seem to love their riots and protests, and these are the sorts of situations that brew a lotta them, the kinds normal folks can't avoid or ignore. Will they leave? Fight back? Join in for lack of better options?

It'll be fun to watch from the sidelines, regardless.
 
Of all cities that should be eager for it, it really should be the one with the literal giant world wonder statue asking for more of them.
That only applied when all we needed were barely-warm bodies to plunk on factory lines to have their bodies physically ground down to dust.
every other city in the nation is probably ramping up their advertising on how nice and safe their cities are for rich people and wealthy businesses looking to relocate
The suburbs and ring towns around my current metro locale already do this. They advertise in straight-up dogwhistle terms how much "safety" they have.
The only business that really needs to stay in NYC right now is high frequency stock trading
Not anymore. Some of the largest hedge funds in the country are already operating out of the Newport Beach area in California. Ain't no pit jockeys working the counter anymore. You can be anywhere you want when "working on wall street" entails pinging a server located in a Chicago or northern Virginia datacenter.
The real question is where the breaking point will be for the normal folks.
They left already. They WFH-ed themselves down to their beach and mountain houses and never came back. Hence, all the MUH RTO! rah-rah. "Come back to the city please! Come spend your time in a one-third full office, that's almost exclusively filled with the people you work with who are currently divorcing their spouses, where the streets are even dirtier and filled with more vagrancy than you remember, and oh yeah lunches are $20 and parking is $50 now! Do it RIGHT NOW or we will put economic pressure on your employer to force you! The city patronage revolving door needs tax dollars!"
 
NYC is going bankrupt again and can’t pay for basic services yet morons like /r/fuckcars somehow believe that the cities subsidize the suburbs.
Nobody would dare not bail them out nowadays, sadly. Not even Trump.
But, oh, to see a headline like this...
1700248442641.jpeg
 
Unfortunately, when someone like Kyle Rittenhouse or Daniel Perry steps up to the plate, crooked prosecutors try to have their scalps.

"Defund the Police" is just a pretext for anarcho-tyrants to commandeer the police. Lolbergtarianism has never worked once. You need Right-Wing cops who will protect the rights of the Decent Many and beat the shit out of the Worthless Few.

You cannot coexist with people who want you dead. There is no liberty in the future. The best we can hope for is a powerful state under the control of the based.

I know that's mean, I know it's unfair, I know it's hypocritical. But there's no place for such niceties when you are up against an existential threat.

It's not enough to say "Don't Tread On Me"; you have to either Tread or Be Tread Upon. Conquer, or be conquered. Crush, or be crushed. Win, or go exinct. In politics, the meek shall inherit nothing.

Society needs tardwranglers. Sorry if that offends your lolberg sensibilities, but the side that wants to "just be left alone" will ALWAYS lose to the side that wants to win. You cannot use "muh rights" against a faction that has no qualms about sending death squads after fat, crippled old men who talk shit about them.

So don't come crying to me when you are hauled off to the gas chambers. I'll be sure to have "Imagine If Things Were Reversed!" engraved on your tombstone. Loser.
BuT wE'RE aLL in THis ToGETHER!

*Until we're not but I'll lie anyway. Also I'll help eat away at the edges when you're not looking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oh piss off!
Not anymore. Some of the largest hedge funds in the country are already operating out of the Newport Beach area in California. Ain't no pit jockeys working the counter anymore. You can be anywhere you want when "working on wall street" entails pinging a server located in a Chicago or northern Virginia datacenter.
I'm talking about the server farms when I say high frequency, I'm talking the bots running algo's where a millisecond latency is make or break in booking the trade. So aside from the IT staff and a few execs to make a good show, they can fuck off to greener pastures too.

They can move that infrastructure eventually, but its hundreds of billions of dollars worth of stuff to move, and everyone has to agree on the new site, basically. Practically, not gonna happen, easier to wait for some technological revolution to network tech that invalidates the old hubs and makes a new one by accident.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Manul Otocolobus
Nobody would dare not bail them out nowadays, sadly. Not even Trump.
But, oh, to see a headline like this...
View attachment 5501516
I dunno. I could see Trump offering to bail them out... 'with some conditions'.

It's one of the reasons the Beltway uniparty assholes wanted him gone. California is in similar straits, and I cannot imagine how bad Trump would've fucked them without lube if they had to come to him hat in hand.
 
Considering the judge just let go the two dudes who beat up a cop free without paying any bail why would the cops even arrest people any more? Seriously, just tell the people of New York no cop is gonna arrest any one defending themselves/store and just lets the pieces fall as they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oh piss off!
Bill Bratton assured me in his gay book that he fixed NY policing the last time he was commissioner (which was the 2nd time he was commish lol) so there shouldn't be any problem. It's a 2% budget cut. If your massive enterprise can't survive a 2% trim then it's probably fucked up to begin with. Are you sure the department couldn't get rid of some admin staff or something first???

Anyways Bratton said he trained the cops to love niggers now, also half of them ARE niggers now, so there is NOTHING TO SEE move along
 
I dunno. I could see Trump offering to bail them out... 'with some conditions'.

101% this, Trump would gladly bail them out... but he would force them to make New York Great Again. I would not put it past the "people" who run NYC to refuse to ask for a bailout even when going bankrupt if Trump is in charge.
 
101% this, Trump would gladly bail them out... but he would force them to make New York Great Again. I would not put it past the "people" who run NYC to refuse to ask for a bailout even when going bankrupt if Trump is in charge.

I'm pretty sure that Trump gave California bailout money after the 2020 wildfires -- and after publicly declaring that he wouldn't give them anything. And I'm almost positive that Trump gave California some sweet Covidbux. No strings attached in either situation.

I don't even know if he would bother to condition the aid; he's a great showman but a terrible statesman. Most likely, he'd go to his rallies and mock NYC / Cali but when the news cycles moves on, give them what they want.
 
Remember "defund the police". Reap what you sow bitches.
I'm just glad I got to see it before it went to shit. I believe I saw it in 2019, but FUCK living there either way. Bad enough I gotta pay four figures for a broom closet there.
 
I'm pretty sure that Trump gave California bailout money after the 2020 wildfires -- and after publicly declaring that he wouldn't give them anything. And I'm almost positive that Trump gave California some sweet Covidbux. No strings attached in either situation.

There is a big difference between wildfires and pandemic, and a straight up bankruptcy resulting in a request for bail out.
 
Back