Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Probably way off topic, but to be fully honest, there's a lot of autists that go and say they'd be better off without the technology surrounding them. Pretty much all of them regret what they said the moment it actually happens.
Oh it would be nice to become a space faring species. Im saying that isnt likely. The road is the most likely future we will get.

Its not what I like or not. Its more of which outcome is likely and tolerable. If tech keeps going on its current directory we might end up having total recall type BS for wrong think or cybernetic zombies.
 
In life there are many situations where all outcomes are bad. It becomes a question of which one is the least bad and most likely. A reversion to a pre industrial society is most likely and least bad considering all things.
Unless you're one of the 95%+ people who die because we can't feed the vast majority of humanity without industrial farming. Unless you're one of those voluntary human extinction tards, in which case that would be considered a good thing.
 
Drew some stupid crap to celebrate this madness...
View attachment 1727492

jeb.jpg
 
He would have won if he'd had any coherent, intelligible policy whatsoever, if it even made him look like a leader instead of a bumbling buffoon who had no idea what he was doing. Instead he was shitting on his own chief doc (why not fire him if the guy is actually an idiot), changing his opinion every day or two, recommending quack remedies, and completely failing to lead the country in any way. It's the job of the President at some point not to shitpost on Twitter like a fucking retard and actually lead. Even if his policy was dead wrong, if he had just clearly had one at all it would have looked a lot better.
I agree. If he acted faster, it would have been a lot harder to attack him on it. The media would, but people would have seen what he was doing instead of the cognitive dissonance. He kind of didn't really do all that much, had differing policies, left it up to the states

In life there are many situations where all outcomes are bad. It becomes a question of which one is the least bad and most likely. A reversion to a pre industrial society is most likely and least bad considering all things.
You know all this good shit, like the internet, computers and I don't know, medicine that doesn't involve leeches and sawing your limbs off when you get a small cut? Yeah, all these developments are thanks to industrialization. A majority of Africa is an agrarian society. They don't have time to do any of this.

In a pre-industrial civilization, most of your time is spent farming and getting food. Then its having your wife trek out into the forest to get firewood and having 45 kids because you need help on the farm and can't hire people. Also you're choking to death on carbon monoxide and are going to die at 40 from lung disease and secondary infections. Also half your kids are going to die from preventable diseases. Also, you underestimate just how much land a pre-industrial society needs to function. The answer is, a fucking lot.

Industrialization is why we have science, medicine, technology and all the good shit. Its because we don't have to spend 95% of our time preparing for the winter and freezing to fucking death. You know what is wealth in pre-industry? Having Horses and Cattle. Returning to pre-industrialization is Tyler Durden shit and anyone who is purposing it should be shot in the face. The sheer amount of human misery this would cause would be incalculable.

EDIT:
Oh, by the by, if America decided to turn off factory farming and go back into the woods, billions of people would die. Because our agriculture supplies a lot of the world. So you're consigning billions to a miserable death by starvation. The only thing that would kill more humans would be a nuclear war. It ranks worse only because the radiation will pollute everything. But truthfully, I'd rather get nuked than go to a fucking miserable farming existence.
 
I agree. If he acted faster, it would have been a lot harder to attack him on it. The media would, but people would have seen what he was doing instead of the cognitive dissonance. He kind of didn't really do all that much, had differing policies, left it up to the states


You know all this good shit, like the internet, computers and I don't know, medicine that doesn't involve leeches and sawing your limbs off when you get a small cut? Yeah, all these developments are thanks to industrialization. A majority of Africa is an agrarian society. They don't have time to do any of this.

In a pre-industrial civilization, most of your time is spent farming and getting food. Then its having your wife trek out into the forest to get firewood and having 45 kids because you need help on the farm and can't hire people. Also you're choking to death on carbon monoxide and are going to die at 40 from lung disease and secondary infections. Also half your kids are going to die from preventable diseases. Also, you underestimate just how much land a pre-industrial society needs to function. The answer is, a fucking lot.

Industrialization is why we have science, medicine, technology and all the good shit. Its because we don't have to spend 95% of our time preparing for the winter and freezing to fucking death. You know what is wealth in pre-industry? Having Horses and Cattle. Returning to pre-industrialization is Tyler Durden shit and anyone who is purposing it should be shot in the face. The sheer amount of human misery this would cause would be incalculable.

EDIT:
Oh, by the by, if America decided to turn off factory farming and go back into the woods, billions of people would die. Because our agriculture supplies a lot of the world. So you're consigning billions to a miserable death by starvation. The only thing that would kill more humans would be a nuclear war. It ranks worse only because the radiation will pollute everything. But truthfully, I'd rather get nuked than go to a fucking miserable farming existence.
There's also the fact that a lot of "old knowledge" is gone now thanks to the ease of technology.

We'd have to relearn how to do these things and it would not be a smooth or easy process.
 
View attachment 1727549
yes, we are going back to war in 2021. :gunt: :story: :punished:
Officials ADMIT LYING To Trump To SUBVERT His Orders, Keep Troops In Middle East
No surprise trump's a racist but we need to bomb more brown people because corporate interests.
Shit never changes.
 

Attachments

  • 20201106_002844.jpg
    20201106_002844.jpg
    64.4 KB · Views: 61
Is it just me or has /pol/s obsession with trannies reached absolutely pathological levels? Yeah I know pot kettle etc but it seems to be on the level of umad back in 2010.
Transfolk make up an incredibly negligible part of the population. Why people give them the time of day is beyond me. That Biden wants to put them as a defense advisor is beyond me. It is a mental illness, to not accept reality. It seems to me like a welcome mat for China to steamroll over us and it is disgusting.
 
Transfolk make up an incredibly negligible part of the population. Why people give them the time of day is beyond me. That Biden wants to put them as a defense advisor is beyond me. It is a mental illness, to not accept reality. It seems to me like a welcome mat for China to steamroll over us and it is disgusting.

“The existence of transgender people will lead to China taking over the US” is not something I expected to see said today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back