Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

(BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP!)

Mr. Trump, did you soil yourself again?

Smells like freedom!

 

[EyelessMC]

Then by the same token, one could argue "rape" is an "ingrained sexual orientation", so if a woman tries to resist her rapist's advances, he could sue her for discrimination.

Crazy, right? That wouldn't happen because "rape" will never be considered a sexual orientation, and yet the sexual attraction towards children--the very impetus for child rape--has been getting that kind of traction for years.
You can see how this madness thinly veiled as logic works. All you need are some "experts" approving it and tearful faces pleading its cause. Once the precedent is set, sky's the limit.
Or center of the earth, in this case.

 

[StraightShooter2]

Crazy, right? That wouldn't happen because "rape" will never be considered a sexual orientation, and yet the sexual attraction towards children--the very impetus for child rape--has been getting that kind of traction for years.
You can see how this madness thinly veiled as logic works. All you need are some "experts" approving it and tearful faces pleading its cause. Once the precedent is set, sky's the limit.
Or center of the earth, in this case.

To me, that makes no sense.

If wanting to rape a child boy/girl is "gaining traction", then there's no reason that wanting to rape an adult man/woman shouldn't (given that in comparsion, it's the "moderate" of the two views, while wanting to rape a child is the more "extreme").

Supposedly even in "prison hierarchies", child rapists are at the bottom of the "pecking order", even below ordinary rapists.

So no, there's no way anyone could justify wanting to rape a child and claim it's a "protected sexual orientation" unless they want to include wanting to rape adult men or women in that perverse vein of logic as well.

 

[Bland Crumbs]

LOL Things are looking great...

Totally above board.

 

[EyelessMC]

If wanting to rape a child boy/girl is "gaining traction", then there's no reason that wanting to rape an adult man/woman shouldn't

Because pedophilic desire is not portrayed as "rape". It's portrayed as "man-boy/girl love". Don't you know this already? I thought it was common knowledge.

And why did you put "gaining traction" in quotes like that, as if what I mentioned wasn't evidenced by years of articles and supposed experts advocating the same? Weren't you around for the "Noble Pedophile" and "I'm a Pedophile, but YOU'RE the Monsters!" articles?

So no, there's no way anyone could justify wanting to rape a child and claim it's a "protected sexual orientation" unless they want to include wanting to rape adult men or women in that perverse vein of logic as well.

Dude you saw the Independant article I just posted. Here's the link to prove I didn't fake it: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...al-psychologist-child-sex-abuse-a6965956.html

The idea was being floated in academia even back in 2012 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-011-9882-6

Pedophilia receiving a sensitive and accepting light has been simmering in the background of this whole cultural affair internationally for years.
It's not a partisan thing either, although a lot of party-player pretend it is. Seriously, look up "pedophilia, sexual orientation" etc. for yourself. You're in for a wild ride going further back the last six years.
Mind you, it arguably started from Alfred Kinsey, but that's a name for a whole other thread...

When you pathologize evil you make it something to either be treated/cured or something to be accepted. If pedophilia is something that cannot be treated/cured, then there arises a miserable worm of an idea, the idea that perhaps it is simply...part of who you are?

Also, just for the sake of total clarity, here's the direct link timecode...

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

60minutes on 11/29/2020 is gas lighting that that had fair & correct election & no one did nothing wroung minus the glitches because paper ballots are super reliable there a paper trail.

We're still waiting on evidence that it was not fair and correct. Even Trump's own lawyers admit there's no evidence of fraud. Recounts and audits, of paper ballots, mind you, showed the results were accurate. So unless you have evidence that there was fraud, there was no fraud

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

To me, that makes no sense.

If wanting to rape a child boy/girl is "gaining traction", then there's no reason that wanting to rape an adult man/woman shouldn't (given that in comparsion, it's the "moderate" of the two views, while wanting to rape a child is the more "extreme").

Supposedly even in "prison hierarchies", child rapists are at the bottom of the "pecking order", even below ordinary rapists.

So no, there's no way anyone could justify wanting to rape a child and claim it's a "protected sexual orientation" unless they want to include wanting to rape adult men or women in that perverse vein of logic as well.

Pedophiles now call themselves MAPs (minor attracted people) and NOMAPS (non-offending minor attracted people). They've been saying that they were born pedophiles and should be part of the LGBT for several years now.


They're not taken very seriously, but they are slowly gaining traction. Think about it: transgender kids are becoming more and more mainstream. Believing it's normal for a five year old to want to chop their cock off isn't far from believing it's normal for a five year old to have sex.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Theory that's going around: Joe Biden's foot fracture is fake and is nothing but an excuse to hide an ankle monitor.
View attachment 1756752
It's probably pure copium, but it is interesting to note that McCain's "fracture" changed foot.

Lude (who leaked many of Hunter Biden's dick pics) is also saying Biden has agreed to concede in exchange for a pardon. However, he is known for making things up. Take his claims with a very fat grain of salt.
View attachment 1756776

Some cameras swap the sides, so it could be that (with regards to McCain). The Biden ankle thing seems completely retarded though.

 

[EyelessMC]

Pedophiles now call themselves MAPs (minor attracted people). They've been saying that they were born pedophiles and should be part of the LGBT for several years now.
View attachment 1757173

They're not taken very seriously, but they are slowly gaining traction. Think about it: transgender kids are becoming more and more mainstream. Believing it's normal for a five year old to want to chop their cock off isn't far from believing it's normal for a five year old to have sex.

Unholy hell I forgot about MAPs entirely...

 

[Bland Crumbs]

Some cameras swap the sides, so it could be that (with regards to McCain). The Biden ankle thing seems completely retarded though.

The Biden ankle thing is completely retarded. He has secret service wranglers if he forgets where he is and starts wandering around the neighborhood in a robe.

 

[Tim Buckley]

Kek is now saying Biden will consneed, but for Kamala!

View attachment 1756912

ftfy

 

[Nom Carver]

At this point I just can't wait for the election to end. If Trump somehow pulls a win out of his ass... Oh man, an outcome like that would be a goddamn salt motherlode!

 

[FatalTater]

Next president will either be Kamala Harris or, if Trump wins, then Ivanka will run and win in the next election.

Duh.

 

[Terrifik]

Because pedophilic desire is not portrayed as "rape". It's portrayed as "man-boy/girl love". Don't you know this already? I thought it was common knowledge.
View attachment 1757100

And why did you put "gaining traction" in quotes like that, as if what I mentioned wasn't evidenced by years of articles and supposed experts advocating the same? Weren't you around for the "Noble Pedophile" and "I'm a Pedophile, but YOU'RE the Monsters!" articles?

Dude you saw the Independant article I just posted. Here's the link to prove I didn't fake it: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...al-psychologist-child-sex-abuse-a6965956.html

The idea was being floated in academia even back in 2012 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-011-9882-6

Pedophilia receiving a sensitive and accepting light has been simmering in the background of this whole cultural affair internationally for years.
It's not a partisan thing either, although a lot of party-player pretend it is. Seriously, look up "pedophilia, sexual orientation" etc. for yourself. You're in for a wild ride going further back the last six years.
Mind you, it arguably started from Alfred Kinsey, but that's a name for a whole other thread...

When you pathologize evil you make it something to either be treated/cured or something to be accepted. If pedophilia is something that cannot be treated/cured, then there arises a miserable worm of an idea, the idea that perhaps it is simply...part of who you are?
View attachment 1757137

Also, just for the sake of total clarity, here's the direct link timecode...

Pedophiles now call themselves MAPs (minor attracted people) and NOMAPS (non-offending minor attracted people). They've been saying that they were born pedophiles and should be part of the LGBT for several years now.
View attachment 1757173

They're not taken very seriously, but they are slowly gaining traction. Think about it: transgender kids are becoming more and more mainstream. Believing it's normal for a five year old to want to chop their cock off isn't far from believing it's normal for a five year old to have sex.

So why is this always coming back to slippery slope argument & Jims slip in slide(corruption or influence of MAP or NMAP in LGBTQ Community).
All we wanted to not care if you called yourself one of 64 genders & had partner meen gay or same sex for health & tax reasons as long let us grill.

 

[BlackDragoons]

Cross posting a bit but the logistical nightmare of a fraud this big would be well pretty big if they where trying to pull this off.

 

[treblehunter98]

Cross posting a bit but the logistical nightmare of a fraud this big would be well pretty big if they where trying to pull this off.

It would probably be the most elaborate crime in human history, fraud on an individual level is already hard enough, falsifying about 100k votes in every major battleground state sounds like fiction.

 

[potato in mah painus]

We're still waiting on evidence that it was not fair and correct. Even Trump's own lawyers admit there's no evidence of fraud. Recounts and audits, of paper ballots, mind you, showed the results were accurate. So unless you have evidence that there was fraud, there was no fraud

At this point, I'm hoping he does. Just so some of us can simply throw COPE back at you when you have your meltdown from it.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Cross posting a bit but the logistical nightmare of a fraud this big would be well pretty big if they where trying to pull this off.

Not really. You would just need algorithmic control of the automatic vote tallying from the machines. This can be done with a few key people in the target state and after that, a simple Stand Alone Complex among poll workers and governing officials with severe TDS would nudge things over the top.

It should also be noted that considering the slew of shrieks about weird shit going down it wasnt hidden at all. The only people saying something does not smell is the national press and they long ago gave up any pretense of being anything other then the mouthpiece of the institutional state.

 

[Zonga]

I didn't even know what a "transbian" was and thought it was just a joke from this
View attachment 1757038


Good point. It's one of the main problems with the bill, yes, but I'd also caution against overlooking the vague approach to the subject of therapy and overall narrative being painted of discrimination. Laws are made and developed in light of precedent.
Even with everything explicit and obviously dangerous about this insanity there is inevitable next step--what would be after transgender? What else could be considered a "sexual orientation" or "sexual identity"?
>inb4 someone says "there's no way incest or pedophilia would ever be considered sexual orientation or identity"
Really?
View attachment 1757051
If "pedophilia is a sexual orientation" ever caught the political gust under its wings transgenderism did it would be retroactively read into this bill specifically designed against discrimination. Whatever would be "officially" recognized as a sexual orientation in ten years from now could be protected under this bill, given a few amendments here or there.

Precedence is law.

Also, even as it is right now, if the Equality Act was amended so that someone can't just claim to be trans but they require the approval or assessment of someone with a PhD, we then get into the game of "which doctor will eventually say 'yes'", and once they find one they could go back the line of the previous doctors who said "no" and claim discrimination.

Arright, I'm gonna weigh in on this pedophilia shitshow, against my better judgement.

So, if you see the world through the spergiest lens possible, where only logical consistency matters, then the pedos *actually have a point*. There is fundamentally no *structural* or *denotative* difference between the argument against pedophilia-as-orientation, and the old arguments against homosexuality-as-orientation. People absolutely seem to be legitimately "born this way".

But the moment you start looking at pragmatics *literally at all*, that flies right out the fucking window.

All sexual orientations - even the most absurdly prudish vanilla-hetero-onlyfuckthroughaholeinasheetforprocreation bs, carry with them the opportunity for people to get massively damaged, both emotionally and physically. We put up with it because sex is a powerful biological drive, and because it's simply flat out true that every culture that decides to enforce total celibate abstinence *dies out* after seventy years or so, for some weird reason.

So, since there's always gonna be SOME fucking going on, the pragmatic question for any society is: "where do we draw the lines?"

It seems probable to me that homosexuality imparts a bit more chance of harm than heterosexuality, although modern medicine closes that gap somewhat.

It seems pretty evident to me, at least on the psychological front, that honoring transexual variance as culturally valid and respectable imparts more risk of harm than homosexuality does.

And note that these harms have to be weighed against the *very real harm* that we do when we deny someone their "natural" sexual outlets and identity recognition. I'm not going to join in on the "lol troons aren't people, they don't deserve to have their suffering acknowledged" bandwagon; there are people who legitimately suffer if forced to live in a body they don't recognize as 'theirs'. But there are *also* people who suffer if their clearly delusional psychoses are indulged, and if we as a culture can't tell the difference, then all we can do is work out the math of *which way causes less suffering*.

Which brings me to... Eww...

So, the pedos. Based on brain imagery stuff, it seems pretty irrefutable that there are people who are just... Attracted to kids. Literally born that way. Can't be helped. Some are even pretty freaked out by it.

And yeah, by *pure, cold, autistic logic*, that counts as an oppressed minority identity, who deserves our sympathy and respect.

But if we allow it to be an identity - if we allow the people who feel this way to feel *one shred of self-respect* about it, we risk unimaginable harm to vastly more young children, who will grow up damaged enough to propagate *more* harm onto others.

So, I think the hate-boners on pedos are probably misguided and counter productive. (The hate-boners on sociopaths who rape kids because they're helpless? That I *fully* endorse.) But the proper attitude is probably closer to putting down Ol Yeller - you love the dog, you care about the dog, but the dog is *suffering* and the dog is *very clearly* a huge danger to literally everyone else, and we don't have any reasonable way of fixing that situation. So, somebody gotta man up and put the dog down.

 

[Wyald]

How about we don't fuck children, like, at all?