- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
No looking good for ol' Trump boy.
Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Status
No looking good for ol' Trump boy.
EyelessMC
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
LOL Nice find. Man, if that doesn't raise a flag or three...
You had to be vaccinated to travel domestically? What country/time were you in? Not being a dick. I'm curious about the actual context here because that is not normal.
This is more fun than expected, but especially when you consider how pissed they are that they actually tweeted about "muh experts say this might be illegal!"
Why doesn't CNN just do to Veritas what it did to that one reddit guy who dared post a meme about them and threaten to dox him?
Emperor Pilaf
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2017
I already knew CNN and the rest of the mainstream media had it out for trump since day 1, we have just lifted the rock the roaches were hiding under and they are of course livid what they have said behind closed doors is now where everyone can see them. Reminds me of when a CNN reporter said outright Wikileaks was illegal to read leaked emails back in 2016.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
This was know as faaaar back as march-may when uk was starting it off & just rescently eddited out that they gave free pass to medical companies for vacine . (AKA you can't sue if you get sick or something from the vacine)
(Evaluating the scale, growth, and origins of right-wing echo chambers on YouTube)
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2020
AnAccount
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2018
I'm sorry to say, but this categorically false claim of widespread voter fraud is going to be used as a rallying call by democrats that the republican psyche operates on basically untrue ideas and 'dangerous lies'
You guys aren't the Democrats, you can't rave about something like russian collusion because you're against a party that's ostensibly pro censorship, and you're essentially falling into a major political trap right now which is going to be used as evidence under the biden for widespread censorship.
I'm not at all saying that's a good thing, but it's bizarre how unaware of the scrutiny that is going to be on the republican party's ideas and ideals, and naive a lot of them are being. trump isn't going to be the president soon, so the republican party is going to lose its get out of jail free card once the media shifts focus from trump, to the republican party and citizens proper.
You guys aren't the Democrats, you can't rave about something like russian collusion because you're against a party that's ostensibly pro censorship, and you're essentially falling into a major political trap right now which is going to be used as evidence under the biden for widespread censorship.
I'm not at all saying that's a good thing, but it's bizarre how unaware of the scrutiny that is going to be on the republican party's ideas and ideals, and naive a lot of them are being. trump isn't going to be the president soon, so the republican party is going to lose its get out of jail free card once the media shifts focus from trump, to the republican party and citizens proper.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
I am from and live in the USA. It is mandatory to work as a crew member on cruise ships.
EyelessMC
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
Okay but I asked if you had to be vaccinated to travel domestically like that article suggested and you said yes. Cruise ships aren't domestic travel.
I mean when did you have to get vaccinated to travel interstate or something like that.
I didn't know about that. That is genuinely disturbing.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
You mean Democrats wouldn't say that the Republican psyche operates on untrue ideas and dangerous lies regardless? lol
They've been calling all Trump voters Nazi demons for years.
King's Gambit Accepted
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2018
90% of Trump voters are dumb boomers who think calling Dems "democrats" is the height of satire. They're dumb and old and pathetic.
EyelessMC
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
Wait a second, that article which was edited to remove the information of the Irish state indemnifying (protecting) vaccine developers from liabilities as a result of "complications" from the vaccine... It mentions Pfizer!
Pfizer is one of the experimental mRNA vaccines that other article listed:
So wait a second, wait-- One of these new, yet not peer-reviewed/scrutinized and still very early in testing vaccines of all new technology was developed by a drug company which, seemingly, was given complete freedom from liability (at least by the Irish state, anyway) in case things turned tits up?
Also--
Oh good.
So who else wants to just tell everyone to"TRUST THE PLAN" "TAKE THE JAB"?
Edit: Just to be clear, the article https://archive.md/ShYh1 is from Nov. 17
The video (and fast shipping of the vaccine in the article) is from Nov. 30
They plan on distributing the vaccine by Dec. 10
How the hell did we go from "experimental new tech vaccine that is still in preliminary stages, not peer-reviewed or tested for age groups, ethnicities, etc." to "We're gonna start giving needles in two weeks if there's emergency"?
Edit 2: They are shipping it before getting emergency authorization, before getting peer-reviewed, before getting further testing done, etc.
Just to make it absolutely clear for the functionally retarded
Pfizer is one of the experimental mRNA vaccines that other article listed:
So wait a second, wait-- One of these new, yet not peer-reviewed/scrutinized and still very early in testing vaccines of all new technology was developed by a drug company which, seemingly, was given complete freedom from liability (at least by the Irish state, anyway) in case things turned tits up?
Also--
Oh good.
So who else wants to just tell everyone to
Edit: Just to be clear, the article https://archive.md/ShYh1 is from Nov. 17
The video (and fast shipping of the vaccine in the article) is from Nov. 30
They plan on distributing the vaccine by Dec. 10
How the hell did we go from "experimental new tech vaccine that is still in preliminary stages, not peer-reviewed or tested for age groups, ethnicities, etc." to "We're gonna start giving needles in two weeks if there's emergency"?
Edit 2: They are shipping it before getting emergency authorization, before getting peer-reviewed, before getting further testing done, etc.
Just to make it absolutely clear for the functionally retarded
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
Maybe in your area. Over here, the Dems are dumb pathetic hippies while Republicans seem to be more grounded in reality. Both sides have their share of retards, the type of retard you get just varies by location.
King's Gambit Accepted
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2018
AnAccount
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2018
yeah I know, difference is, it was much more ambiguous, generally the 'moderates' so called saw through this, recent stuff like Q anon, Election fraud, even the coronavirus to a degree is going to be used to paint a very broad, very negative picture of republicans, and It's honestly handing the democrats the moderate, swing state, censorship buffet from now until the republicans redirect their attention towards moderates and general right wing individuals.
Trump was great at not disavowing a lot of right wing stuff in the 2016 election, and not disavowing a lot of left wing stuff too which really helped him form a strong contingent of not far right '4chan gaymergate #Far right right nazis' As the left liked to put, but a strong group of moderates, center right and right wing voters that saw the democrats as the insane, weird left wing party it was.
Since then, the trump/republican agenda morphed away from moderate and center right politics, to at this point, genuine lunacy that's going to cost you the next election if you give you the democratic media four more years of Qanon, Election fraud, Proud boys, Chinese Venezuelan collusion???? Coronavirus is fake, and whatever future weird controversies might pop up.
I'm not saying you need to drop being right wing or anything, or that you need to be big brained centrists, there's a decent republican agenda, and the republicans really need to redirect towards it, or you're gonna have trouble in the future. whether it has to do with censorship or swing states.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
Nuclear button has been pressed @Null 
A ribbon hangs on the White House for World AIDS Day 2020, Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is threatening to veto a defense policy bill unless it ends protections for internet companies that shield them from being held liable for material posted by their users.
On Twitter Tuesday night, Trump took aim at Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects companies that can host trillions of messages from being sued into oblivion by anyone who feels wronged by something someone else has posted — whether their complaint is legitimate or not.
Trump called Section 230 “a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity,” adding, “Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Bill.”
Trump has been waging war against social media companies for months, claiming they are biased against conservative voices.
In October he signed an executive order directing executive branch agencies to ask independent rule-making agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, to study whether they can place new regulations on the companies.
Since losing the presidential election, Trump has flooded social media with unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud. Twitter has tagged many such Trump tweets with the advisory, “This claim about election fraud is disputed.”
Tuesday’s veto threat is another potential roadblock for the passage of the annual defense policy measure, which is already being held up in Congress by a spat over military bases named for Confederate officers. The measure, which has passed for 59 years in a row on a bipartisan basis, guides Pentagon policy and cements decisions about troop levels, new weapons systems and military readiness, military personnel policy and other military goals.
A ribbon hangs on the White House for World AIDS Day 2020, Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is threatening to veto a defense policy bill unless it ends protections for internet companies that shield them from being held liable for material posted by their users.
On Twitter Tuesday night, Trump took aim at Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects companies that can host trillions of messages from being sued into oblivion by anyone who feels wronged by something someone else has posted — whether their complaint is legitimate or not.
Trump called Section 230 “a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity,” adding, “Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Bill.”
Trump has been waging war against social media companies for months, claiming they are biased against conservative voices.
In October he signed an executive order directing executive branch agencies to ask independent rule-making agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, to study whether they can place new regulations on the companies.
Since losing the presidential election, Trump has flooded social media with unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud. Twitter has tagged many such Trump tweets with the advisory, “This claim about election fraud is disputed.”
Tuesday’s veto threat is another potential roadblock for the passage of the annual defense policy measure, which is already being held up in Congress by a spat over military bases named for Confederate officers. The measure, which has passed for 59 years in a row on a bipartisan basis, guides Pentagon policy and cements decisions about troop levels, new weapons systems and military readiness, military personnel policy and other military goals.
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2017
Well, it was nice posting with you guys.Nuclear button has been pressed @Null
View attachment 1761376
A ribbon hangs on the White House for World AIDS Day 2020, Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is threatening to veto a defense policy bill unless it ends protections for internet companies that shield them from being held liable for material posted by their users.
On Twitter Tuesday night, Trump took aim at Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects companies that can host trillions of messages from being sued into oblivion by anyone who feels wronged by something someone else has posted — whether their complaint is legitimate or not.
Trump called Section 230 “a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity,” adding, “Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Bill.”
Trump has been waging war against social media companies for months, claiming they are biased against conservative voices.
In October he signed an executive order directing executive branch agencies to ask independent rule-making agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, to study whether they can place new regulations on the companies.
Since losing the presidential election, Trump has flooded social media with unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud. Twitter has tagged many such Trump tweets with the advisory, “This claim about election fraud is disputed.”
Tuesday’s veto threat is another potential roadblock for the passage of the annual defense policy measure, which is already being held up in Congress by a spat over military bases named for Confederate officers. The measure, which has passed for 59 years in a row on a bipartisan basis, guides Pentagon policy and cements decisions about troop levels, new weapons systems and military readiness, military personnel policy and other military goals.
derpherp2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2020
True, but NOW we can spread more #awareness, because that'll somehow do something to the already broken trust in journalistic sources.
I do love how CNN still thinks people take them seriously though, like we magically forgot they tried to sue a teenager for posting mocking gifs at them.
Or how their newsanchors don't know how to put on masks, while touting masks as being a good thing.
Also, actual proof of their bias is always neat, instead of speculation that can just be slapped off as "conspiracies," I mean after all look at this thread and how often synonyms of that word is thrown around.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
The moderates have to choose between one kind of loony and another, sadly. The right has Q anon and Nazis, the left has transgender child groomers and antifa.
The Democratic media doesn't mind making up stuff out of whole cloth. The Proud Boys never caused much trouble, for instance. They rarely start the violence, antifa just shows up to every event they organize. There's no saving the image of the Republicans because the media has no interest in the truth.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2019
Putting national defense funding up on a shelf until he gets his way is a step and a half away from a genuine act of terrorism. Who the fuck actually voted in the retarded fat kid? That swamp get drained yet?? lmfao
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2018
"We have decided to wait til January 20th 2021 to revisit thisNuclear button has been pressed @Null
View attachment 1761376
A ribbon hangs on the White House for World AIDS Day 2020, Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is threatening to veto a defense policy bill unless it ends protections for internet companies that shield them from being held liable for material posted by their users.
On Twitter Tuesday night, Trump took aim at Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which protects companies that can host trillions of messages from being sued into oblivion by anyone who feels wronged by something someone else has posted — whether their complaint is legitimate or not.
Trump called Section 230 “a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity,” adding, “Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Bill.”
Trump has been waging war against social media companies for months, claiming they are biased against conservative voices.
In October he signed an executive order directing executive branch agencies to ask independent rule-making agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, to study whether they can place new regulations on the companies.
Since losing the presidential election, Trump has flooded social media with unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud. Twitter has tagged many such Trump tweets with the advisory, “This claim about election fraud is disputed.”
Tuesday’s veto threat is another potential roadblock for the passage of the annual defense policy measure, which is already being held up in Congress by a spat over military bases named for Confederate officers. The measure, which has passed for 59 years in a row on a bipartisan basis, guides Pentagon policy and cements decisions about troop levels, new weapons systems and military readiness, military personnel policy and other military goals.
"And it's a done deal. Not sure how far this will go, but I'm sure it won't go far
- Status