Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%
  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%
  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%

  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
WHO estimated ~750,000,000 global chinese virus cases so far several weeks ago

Currently about 1.2 million deaths globally

The 'science' was believed in Europe and they're in worse shape than the United States medically and economically :story:

Another awesome job by the cult of 'science'

Dont worry people will always want to talk pasta, you dont have to sperg because because you feel insecure that they wont
Again, I am gonna need a citation on the 750 million cases claim, because that's not even close to accurate lol. Not that you'd believe anything not coming from Trump's mouth anyway, but that number isn't even close to accurate. The 750 million is a very rough estimate, with really no basis in fact. Besides, I thought you Trump cultists didn't trust the Chinese WHO? You can't use "estimated cases" to predict a death percentage...

No wonder you hate science so much. I'd hate something if I was that bad at it, too.

Just do me a favor and admit that Trump fucked the pooch on the covid response. That's all I ask. You know it's true. I know it's true. Just admit it.
 
Trump’s presidency was mostly fine, but his handling of covid and 2020 in general was completely unacceptable. I really don’t want to deal with another four years of Trump. I doubt Biden can win though, he has no appeal, and I see much more vocal trump support than Biden support. There’s no way we get a winner until all the mail in ballots get counted, and you abolsolutely know that the losing party will throw a shitshow. Conspiracy fags are going to be completely insufferable.

Joe Biden was strangely the weakest candidate they could come up with. You have to wonder if this was deliberately done. Picking someone that's easily beatable, really old (kind of frail too) and who enacted racist crime bill policies in the 1990's. This seems all to portray Trump in a better light despite the Covid incompetency and all the other faults. I have my strong doubts that Joe will win because of this as well as the cult-ish aspect of Trump's supporters.
 
WHO estimated ~750,000,000 global chinese virus cases so far several weeks ago

Currently about 1.2 million deaths globally

The 'science' was believed in Europe and they're in worse shape than the United States medically and economically :story:

Another awesome job by the cult of 'science'

Dont worry people will always want to talk pasta, you dont have to feel insecure that they wont
Remember.
Science loves me this I know
Because black science man tells me so.
Just an aside but one of my parents worked in the medical field and every single doctor or researcher I met as a result was a total fucking psychopath. Same vibes as CEOs and Politicians. Shouldn't really be surprising since both scientists and doctors would back up Hitler or fucking Stalin if they thought it would give them the opportunity to vivisect your mother and jerk off over her still pulsing organs.
 
Last edited:
So, unfortunately, we can't look in a mirror universe to compare different outcomes of this election, but I almost expect that even if Biden wins, some BLM protester will find a reason to go loot a few stores.

How are the odds that some Trumpists will go haywire if he loses? I mean, I don't expect anything as substantial as what BLM has done, but I wouldn't be surprised if some QAnon-Fuckos went full retard and tried to do something stupid.

The 'science' was believed in Europe and they're in worse shape than the United States medically and economically
[citation needed]
 
Again, I am gonna need a citation on the 750 million cases claim, because that's not even close to accurate lol. Not that you'd believe anything not coming from Trump's mouth anyway, but that number isn't even close to accurate.

No wonder you hate science so much. I'd hate something if I was that bad at it, too.

US News and World Report October 5 2020

WHO estimates coronavirus has infected 10% of world's population

On my phone so cant link, it's the top result if you google "who estimates 750 million coronavirus cases" along with multiple other mainstream sources

You seem really upset brother, go drink some juvee juice, say your prayers, and train
 
You gotta be an incredible narcissist to think you know more about a subject than people who devoted their lives to studying it, but here we are.

You don't have to think you're better than someone at X in order to not trust them. A smart guy with incredible credentials can still just, you know, lie. Not saying it's the case here, but your take on this is just tribal nonsense.

People seem to have goldfish memory when it comes to the news, so i'll just point out again that at the beginning of the pandemic, WHO was against masks. Not because they thought they don't work, but as it came out later, it was because they were afraid medical staff won't have enough masks if civilians buy them out. People who are experts in the field can still lie and try to play the uninitiated.
 
Trump’s presidency was mostly fine, but his handling of covid and 2020 in general was completely unacceptable. I really don’t want to deal with another four years of Trump. I doubt Biden can win though, he has no appeal, and I see much more vocal trump support than Biden support. There’s no way we get a winner until all the mail in ballots get counted, and you abolsolutely know that the losing party will throw a shitshow. Conspiracy fags are going to be completely insufferable.
Trumpers still refuse to admit that Trump did anything but pure perfection in handling covid. See tards like @draggs

US News and World Report October 5 2020

WHO estimates coronavirus has infected 10% of world's population

On my phone so cant link, it's the top result if you google "who estimates 750 million coronavirus cases" along with multiple other mainstream sources

You seem really upset brother, go drink some juvee juice, say your prayers, and train
Yeah and you can't use "estimated cases", when there's really no baseline for it, for the death toll. Do you know why that is, or do I have to explain it to you? I know you claim to be good at science, so you should know the answer to this. If not, I can answer it for you.
 
I'd be careful making that bet if I were you.

Fair point, but last time someone made that bet, it was AGAINST Donald Trump, not FOR.

eatmyhat.png
 
Trumpers still refuse to admit that Trump did anything but pure perfection in handling covid. See tards like @draggs


Yeah and you can't use "estimated cases", when there's really no baseline for it, for the death toll. Do you know why that is, or do I have to explain it to you? I know you claim to be good at science, so you should know the answer to this. If not, I can answer it for you.
So let's just get this straight, do we or do we not trust WHO? Do we only trust WHO when it agrees that COVID should shut down the world and throw out their opinion when it no longer fits?
 
Okay so the takeaway here is some scientists are good and make experimental things that work, and there's no such thing as a scientist who gets it wrong or lies?
No, the takeaway is that any scientist (especially from high ranking places like the CDC, NIAID, NIH, etc etc etc with high barriers of entry and qualification requirements) is more trustworthy than a mentally challenged tangerine with no scientific knowledge or experience.
 
So let's just get this straight, do we or do we not trust WHO? Do we only trust WHO when it agrees that COVID should shut down the world and throw out their opinion when it no longer fits?
You tell me. You Trumpers are the ones who say not to trust the WHO.

I say we can trust them, but any "estimate" by any agency needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt. You can't use it to calculate death percentage because you don't know if the estimate is correct (inaccurate denominator) and you also wouldn't have an accurate numerator since the case total is just an estimate and you are using "confirmed" covid deaths. So you are basically making the denominator bigger without accounting for the same application that you applied to the numerator to the denominator. Stats don't work that way.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Jackisnotaname
Tell that to the 230k+ dead Americans because your daddy decided to ignore scientists because he thought it'd hurt his re-election chances to do something about covid.

I don't understand why Trump is to blame for these deaths though, we had months of BLM and Antifa riots where none of them were following quarantine rules or suggestions. Is Trump to blame for BLM existing? Like I said before you cited Australia's lack of cases but they never had a total lockdown, like America they had different rules for different areas all over the place, their mortality rate was something like 0.91%. Canada is the same but around 4.5%. If you want to correlate it directly to lockdown then you need to agree they should have been arresting literally every single person at every single protest and putting them into some temporary internment camp.
 
You tell me. You Trumpers are the ones who say not to trust the WHO.

I say we can trust them, but any "estimate" by any agency needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt. You can't use it to calculate death percentage because you don't know if the estimate is correct (inaccurate denominator) and you also wouldn't have an accurate numerator since the case total is just an estimate and you are using "confirmed" covid deaths. So you are basically making the denominator bigger without accounting for the same application that you applied to the numerator to the denominator. Stats don't work that way.
So we trust them, but we also say that they're probably wrong if it doesn't fit the lock down everything narrative. So we both believe them, and disbelieve them at the same time. Interesting that you so freely admit to doublethink.
 
So let's just get this straight, do we or do we not trust WHO? Do we only trust WHO when it agrees that COVID should shut down the world and throw out their opinion when it no longer fits?
The same question can be turned around, you know. Both sides are somewhat insincere, one treated anything from WHO as pure unmitigated lies and now swears by its word when it's convenient.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back